What is the
difference before and after mattan Torah? Why did it matter that mattan Torah
hadn’t occurred; Torah was being learnt since the times of Noach? Before mattan Torah even though Torah
was learnt it had no ability to permeate through the world. The Torah couldn’t bring kedusha into
the world. Only after mattan Torah
was a connection formed between the Torah and the world. At mattan Torah physical mitzvot were given
to bring kedusha to the physical world.
Therefore, before mattan Torah the Torah had no rule over the
world. Only after the giving of the
Torah does the world have to bend before the Torah. Since Klal Yisroel didn’t have the power of
the Torah to split the sea, there had to be a condition integrated into the
very fabric of the world’s makeup. (See Macshovos Hachasiddus pg.201 for
the explanation of the difference of the Torah before and after mattan Torah.)
At the end of the parsha, there is the battle against
Amalek. It is specifically Yehoshua who
is chosen to lead the war. The Ramban
says that Moshe couldn’t lead the war because he had to pray for the success of
army. However, why is Yehoshua the one
chosen to lead the war? Normally the booty
of a conquered nation is permitted, however in regard to Amalek the navi (Shmuel
Ch. 15) is clear that this was not the case.
Why is Amalek different than other nations? The difference between the
fight against the seven nations in Eretz Yisroel and the fight against Amalek
is that the seven nations were fighting to save their land. Amalek on the other hand fought for no
reason. Their fight against Hashem was
just for the sake of going against Hashem.
The Beis Halevi explains that’s why there is a need to destroy
all the booty of Amalek. Just like
Amalek fought against us for no reason so to we destroy all their property even
though there is no gain from such actions.
Rav Elchonan Wasserman writes in Kovetz Maamarim that the only
way to fight against Amalek is via learning Torah. That’s why specifically Yehoshua, who was the
one who would give over Torah to Klal Yisroel after Moshe, had to lead the
war.
Why is the antidote to Amalek the learning of Torah? It made no sense to attack Klal Yisroel, they clearly were protected by G-d, yet Amalek attacked anyway. Their evil is above sechal, it is an evil that is so great, it can even defy sense. The only way to combat that is via a kedusha above sechal. That is only found
in the Torah, which is a wisdom way above human intellect. That’s why after the defeat of Haman, Amalek there was a new kabbalas hatorah, kiemu vekeblu, for it’s
that power of Torah which destroys Amalek.
If it’s the power of Torah which defeats Amalek, why was
there a need for Moshe to stand and pray for the victory of Klal Yisroel in
this war? Why was it necessary to evoke
the power of prayer? Possibly this
wasn’t a prayer in the ordinary sense of prayer, rather a prayer as part of
learning. The Gemorah in Niddah (70b) says
that success in Torah only comes in tandem with prayer. The prayer of Moshe was part of the power of
Torah which is necessary to defeat Amalek.
Learning without davening is an incomplete learning.
Maybe a more simplistic answer for the distinction between pre and post מתן תורה. The גמ' סוטה daf 21b? says that the zechus torah may be toleh for a סוטה but since a women is אינה מצווה ועושה then it must be the zechus סיוע לתלמוד תורה she had received by helping husband and sons. The idea is that it has to be מצווה ועושה to acheive the same תוקף.
ReplyDeleteI heard this remez once about amalek and torah עמלק=עמל ק' שעמל במשנתו ק' פעמים שאינו דומה מי ששנה פרקו מאה פעמים לשנה 101. Do you know the source?
ReplyDelete