It seems that the Baal Shem Tov had a different
approach. There is a story quoted in
Baal Shem Tov on the Torah that there was once a person gong around claiming
based upon his knowledge of science it made sense for the sea to split just as Klal
Yisroel were walking through. The
Baal Shem Tov heard he was coming to town and he gathered all the townspeople into
the shul. He then proclaimed that
it is Hashem who sets up the conditions of nature. If it was natural for the sea to split
specifically at that time, its because Hashem built into creation that the sea
should be ready to split for Klal Yisroel. The miracle of קריעת ים סוף is that Hashem set up
nature for Klal Yisroel. The Baal
Shem Tov doesn’t view קריעת ים
סוף being a natural occurrence as taking
away from the miracle; it itself is (the greatest) miracle.
The Baal Shem Tov is reminiscent of the Ramban at the end of
Bo. The Ramban asks why is yitzias
mitzraim stresses so much in our religion, shabbos and yom tov are connected
etc.? He explains that the open miracles
that occurred during that time serve as an indicator of the constant hashgacha
that there is on the world. “From the
open miracles we can derive the hidden miracles.” The point isn’t open miracles, but to recognize
Hashem’s constant control of our life. [This
Ramban is a favorite of Rav Sacks, Rosh Yeshiva of Landers, he holds it is fundamental
to our faith, hence he quotes it often and told his children to memorize it.]
I don’t what to make about this מחלוקת. Any ideas?
Update: The Rebbe has a letter printed in the back of Likutay Sichos volume 31 where he believes this teaching of the Baal Shem Tov wasn't written correctly. As we know, the Baal Shem Tov spoke in yiddish and sometimes the translators didn't translate properly. As my father pointed out to me, this debate about how to view miracles already exists in the Rishonim and the view of Chassidim is normally to assume that miracles are indeed miracles.
Update: The Rebbe has a letter printed in the back of Likutay Sichos volume 31 where he believes this teaching of the Baal Shem Tov wasn't written correctly. As we know, the Baal Shem Tov spoke in yiddish and sometimes the translators didn't translate properly. As my father pointed out to me, this debate about how to view miracles already exists in the Rishonim and the view of Chassidim is normally to assume that miracles are indeed miracles.
I'm not sure that the story with the גר"א really tells us anything about his shittah on nissim. The pshat he rejected has קריעת ים סוף not being a nes at all just a scientific trick. The baal shem accepted a pre-programmed quirk in nature designed specifically for כלל ישראל. It could be that the גר"א would agree to such a nes.
ReplyDelete