Thursday, December 29, 2022

Masking Purity

The Pri Tzadikk (#13) says ויש לומר בזה מש"נ ביוסף וירא יוסף את אחיו ויכירם ויתנכר אליהם ופירש"י שנעשה להם כנכרי לדבר קשות והרמב"ן מיאן בפירש"י וכ' ואיננו נכון והיינו משום דבאמת מה שדיבר קשות היה רק ע"י שהם אחיו ואלו היה נכרי לא היה מדבר עמם קשות כלל. ופי' הרמב"ן שהתנכר עצמו ממש בשינוי בגדים שלא יכירוהו ועפ"י דרכנו י"ל מפני שעלה על דעתו פן יכירוהו אחיו שהיו קדושי עליון ע"י הזיו מאור פניו שלו ועל זה התנכר שהטמין והסתיר את המאור פנים שלו בקרבו שלא יכירוהו. וכמו שידוע בקדושי עליון שביכלתם לעשות כן להטמין א"ע עם בחי' קדושתם שלא יכירום. ובזה יובן הלשון שנא' אח"ז בפר' זו כשאמר להם אני יוסף דכ' ולא יכלו אחיו לענות אותו כי נבהלו מפניו דלכאורה הול"ל ממנו ומה הלשון מפניו שמיותר אות. אמנם מפני שכשבא העת להתודע להם אז שוב לא הסתיר את מאור פניו מהם ואז הכירוהו באמת ונבהלו ממאור פניו שראו בו שהוא יוסף. ובענין הזה י"ל ג"כ במש"נ אח"ז כשבא יוסף אל אביו שנא' ויעל לקראת ישראל אביו גשנה וירא אליו וגו' שתיבות וירא אליו נראה כמיותר וכמ"ש הרמב"ן ע"ש אמנם הוא על רמז הנ"ל שבעת שבא אל אביו נתגלה אליו להראות לו את מאור פניו שלו שנתקיים בקדושתו.  

Ysef's tzikdus shown through on his face.  In order to avoid being recognized by the brothers he had to hide his kedusha.  When he drops the secret to them, נבהלו מפניו, they saw Yosef's tzidkus shining through and they wondered how they did not see it. 

The Sfas Emes (5631) במדרש אוי לנו מיום הדין כו'. מה שנבהלו השבטים נראה ע"י שנתגלה הארת יוסף הי' הבושה מה שטעו בקדושת יוסף ע"י ההסתר. וזה עצמו הבושה לעתיד לבוא שיתגלה שעניני עוה"ז עצמם הם מלא קדושה בפנימיות. וזהו עיקר הבושה שצריך להיות לאדם כשמברר לעצמו שבכל דבר יש חיות השי"ת ואיך נוכל לעשות בכח השי"ת היפוך רצונו.  This is the embarrassment.  They realized that they could not pick out Yosef from under his disguise.  It is our job to find Hashem under the disguise of the world. 

Monday, December 26, 2022

Training For The Future

In the הנרות הללו we say ואין לנו רשות להשתמש בהן אלא לראותן בלבד.  Why is this halacha something we need to stress right after lighting the candles?  Why does the Rambam stress that the Chanukah story happened during the Bait Sheni?  

The Kad Hakemach says  ועוד יש בזה טעם אחר והוא כי חשבון ח' רמז לשמן המשיח שהוא על מעלת שמנה, וידוע כי חשבון שמנה הוא אחר הז' במעלת האחד ובזמן המשיח יחזרו כל האומות לאמונתנו הוא שכתוב (צפניה ג׳:ט׳) כי אז אהפוך אל עמים שפה ברורה לקרוא כלם בשם ה' ולעבדו שכם אחד. וכתיב (זכריה י״ד:ט׳) ביום ההוא יהיה ה' אחד ושמו אחד. ולפי שהעולם הזה הוא על מעלת שבעה ומזה היתה מנורת המשכן והמקדש בז' נרות, חייבה החכמה להיות זמן המשיח על מעלת ח' כי בו תהיה מעלה יתירה ותוספת השגה בידיעת הש"י על כל הזמנים שעברו הוא שכתוב (ירמיהו ל״א:ל״ד) כי כלם ידעו אותי למקטנם ועד גדולם. והנה רז"ל הרחיבו הביאור בענין הזה הוא שאמר במס' ערכין (פ"ב דף יג ב) רבי יהודה אומר כנור של מקדש של ז' נימין היה שנא' (תהילים ט״ז:י״א) שובע שמחות את פניך. אל תקרי שובע אלא שבע. ושל ימות המשיח שמנה שנא' למנצח על השמינית על נימא שמינית ושל העוה"ב עשר שנא' (שם לג) בנבל עשור זמרו לו. הענין הזה יש להתבונן בשמנת הימים האלה הנקראים חנוכה שהוא נגזר מלשון חנוך בלשון חנוכת הבית לפי שהוא רומז לשמן המשיח שאנו עתידין לחנך בית המקדש.  He says that Chanukah trains us for the times of Mashiach.  These words are echoed by the Sfas Emes (5646) וחנוכה הוא חינוך ורמז לאלה היו"ט שלעתיד.  What in Chanukah is a preparation for the future? 

ויעש כן אהרן פרש"י להגיד שבחו שלא שינה.  Many asks what is the הו"א that Aharon wouldn't follow instructions?  The Chanukat Hatorah says based upon the Midrash that it doesn't say ןיהי כן about the creation of light because the good light is hidden away for the tzaddikim.  Says the C.H. that the Kabbalists teach that the Aharon drew down that light in the Mikdash through his lighting.  That is what it means, ויעש כן אהרן שלא שינה, Aharon put back the ויהי כן into the lights so that it would not be different from every other creation.  The lighting of the menorah was a small restoration of the original light of creation.  The Ramban says the hadlakat nerot in Behaloscha are continued in the nerot of Chanukah.  The lighting of the menorah illuminates the dark golut with the bright light of creation. 

The Beit Sheni, writes the Yeshuot Yaakov (siman 549) in the name of early sources, was a pitstop in the golut to have a short period of tranquility to be able to establish the Mishna and Gemarah to guide us through the golut.  the Chanukah miracle establishes that the light of the menoah, of the תורה שבעל פה will stay with us and guide until Mashiach as the Shla (Titzavah) notes the menorah is עדות שהשכינה שורה בתוך כלל ישראל and that continues with the Chanukah menorah to demonstrate that the Shechina is guiding us through the golut.   

This is the emphasis that the miracle occurred during the Beit Sheni era.  The miracle is part of a process toward the future.  We say that we can't benefit from the candles because we acknowledge that we have not yet experienced the full fruition of the Chanukah miracle.  In our current state we can only gaze into the light and get a glimpse into the future.  

Tuesday, December 20, 2022

Language Of The Soul

Tehillim (81:6) עֵ֤דוּת ׀ בִּיה֘וֹסֵ֤ף שָׂמ֗וֹ בְּ֭צֵאתוֹ עַל־אֶ֣רֶץ מִצְרָ֑יִם שְׂפַ֖ת לֹא־יָדַ֣עְתִּי אֶשְׁמָֽע.  The Targum says that the עדות is that Yosef did not have relations with אשת פוטיפר.  What is the עדות?  That he was taught all the languages when he left jail.  The Gemarah (Sotah 36b) elaborates on this story that in order to be appointed by Pharaoh he had to know the 70 languages so Gavriel came to teach him the languages but he was not able to understand it so a ה was added to his name and then he was able to know the languages.  Why was Yosef unable to learn the languages?  How was that fixed by adding a ה to his name?  And how is that a proof that he did not have relations with אשת פוטיפר?  The Gemarah also says Pharaoh did not no lashon hakodesh.  Why did he not know lashon hakodesh? 

The Shem MiShmuel cites the Chiduhay HaRim that the language of a nation reflects the middah of the nation.  All of the languages contain the impure middah of the nations but they cover over a spark of spirituality which is brought out when used for a holy purpose.  The Sfas Emes says Yosef was able to know the words of the languages but he did not find the secret to connect to their holiness.  The point of the golut is to be able to purify the languages; to bring out the holiness of the language. 

Therefore, Yosef had a ה added to his name.  The world was created with a ה.  In other words, the ה represents the holiness that is covered up by the creation.  The ה added to his name allows for Yosef to access the kedusha that is hidden in the language by connecting to the point of creation, the kedusha, in the language. 

That may be alluded to when Yosef tells the nation הא לכם זרע וזרעתם את האדמהץ.  With the letter ה I have acquired you, I am able to bring out the kedusha within you. 

Pharaoh, since he had no connection to kedusha was not able to speak lashon hakodesh.  His soul was stuck in a state where it could not connect with lashon hakodesh. 

The fact that Yosef needed a ה added to his name to have a connection to the language of the gentiles proves he had no connection to them.  Had he sinned with אשת פוטיפר, had he indeed had an intimate connection with her, then his soul would have been able to tolerate other languages.  The עדות that this was not the case was the fact that he needed a ה to learn the languages. 

(Sources can be found here.)

Monday, December 19, 2022

Chanukah & Chalek

This post is notes meant to accompany this source sheet. 

 וְחשֶׁךְ, זֶה גָּלוּת יָוָן, שֶׁהֶחֱשִׁיכָה עֵינֵיהֶם שֶׁל יִשְׂרָאֵל בִּגְזֵרוֹתֵיהֶן, שֶׁהָיְתָה אוֹמֶרֶת לָהֶם, כִּתְבוּ עַל קֶרֶן הַשּׁוֹר שֶׁאֵין לָכֶם חֵלֶק בֵּאלֹקֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל.  Why did they say you have no חלק?  Why did they say write it on an ox horn?  And what does this have to do with darkness?  

כי חלק ה עמו יעקב חבל נחלתו means that Klal Yisrael is under a special Hashgacha of Hashem.  The Greeks wanted to deny that special connection.  They said you are not 'חלק ה, you don't have a special connection.  Any possibility of that was lost during the sin of agel where Klal Yisrael demonstrated the desire for an intermediatory.  However, that is not the case.  Klal Yisrael is in essence always connected to Hashem.  

Just as the moon reflects the sun's rays, light is a metaphor for the connection of Klal Yisrael to Hashem.  When it is strong there is light.  When it is diminished through sin it becomes dark.  That is the darkness of יון, to attempt to put a wedge between the innate connection Klal Yisrael has with Hashem.   

Thursday, December 15, 2022

Of Admitting And Thanking

Harav Hagaon Binyamin Cohen Shlita

In this week’s parashah, Yehudah publicly admits that Tamar was innocent, and as a result, the beis din did not have Tamar executed. This courageous admission of Yehudah’s is what prompted Reuven to make a public admission as well, Chazal say (Makkos 11b). The Midrash teaches that Yehudah’s gevurah in making this admission came from his mother, Leah, who declared when he was born, הַפַּעַם אוֹדֶה אֶת ה'. Yehudah was her fourth child, which was more than she expected to have, and Rashi explains that she gave thanks to Hashem because she felt she had received more than her share. Because she gave thanks, says the Midrash, she merited to have children who were also baalei hoda’ah: Yehudah, who said צָדְקָה מִמֶּנִּי, and Dovid Hamelech, who said הוֹדוּ לַה' כִּי טוֹב.

The connection between Leah’s hoda’ah and that of her descendant, Dovid Hamelech, is obvious. But what connection is there between Leah’s giving thanks to Hashem and Yehudah’s admission of what he had done? How can both Dovid and Yehudah be termed baalei hoda’ah?

Rav Hutner explains that the word hoda’ah has two meanings. It means giving thanks, as in the phrase modeh ani, and it also means admitting, as in the phrases hoda’as baal din, modeh b’miktzas, modeh b’knas. Rav Hutner explains that there’s a connection between giving thanks and admitting. In order to thank someone, you have to admit that you received or benefited from them. Since Leah “admitted” the good Hashem had given her, by giving thanks, she merited to have a son who possessed this middah of hoda’ah and was able to make a difficult admission.

Rav Nosson Wachtfogel expresses a similar idea, using slightly different wording. He explains that when someone gives hoda’ah, he becomes “shuldig” — obligated or indebted to another person. When you thank someone, you are indebted to them, and when you admit that you wronged someone else, you become obligated to them as well.

Now, we find that after Leah gave hoda’ah, she stopped having children, as the passuk says, וַתַּעֲמֹד מִלֶּדֶת. ThTur al haTorah says that because she thanked Hakadosh Baruch Hu for the past but she didn’t daven for the future, to have more children, she stopped having children for a while. It sounds like she was punished — but why? It seems polite not to ask for more! Why would that make her deserving of punishment?

Rav Avraham Erlanger zt”l explains that when we give hoda’ah to Hakadosh Baruch Hu, we are admitting that everything comes from Him, that we need Him, and that on our own we would have nothing. We are utterly dependent on His goodness. Once a person achieves that recognition fully, he automatically turns to Hashem and davens: “I need more, I’m dependent, I can’t go further without You, Hashem.” If a person does not take this next step of davening, then the hoda’ah is incomplete.

This idea can explain why, in Hallel — which is composed of pirkei Tehillim that give thanks to Hakadosh Baruch Hu — we make requests like אָנָּא ה' הוֹשִׁיעָה נָּא אָנָּא ה' הַצְלִיחָה נָּא. How do these requests fit into Hallel? The answer is that in Hallel, we thank Hakadosh Baruch Hu and admit that everything comes from Him. Once we recognize that He is the kol yachol and we are utter dependent on Him, then automatically, we are spurred to ask Him to save us and give us hatzlachah.

Every Yom Tov, we know, has its own purpose and goal. Pesach is Zman Cheiruseinu, Shavuos is Zman Mattan Toraseinu, Succos is Zman Simchaseinu, and Chanukah is a time l’hodos u’lehallel. True, we say “Modim” three times a day all year long, but on Chanukah the mitzvas hayom is specifically to give praise and thanks. It’s a time for us to contemplate, acknowledge, and admit to all the good that Hakadosh Baruch Hu does for us personally and for all of Klal Yisrael.

In Al Hanissim, we begin with “Bimei Mattisyahu Kohen Gadol,” but, as Rav Nosson Wachtfogel points out, we don’t follow with any mention of how Mattisyahu and his sons led the battle and won the war. All we say is that when the evil Greek Empire sought to obliterate Torah, Hashem fought on our behalf: רבת את ריבם, דנת את דינם, נקמת את נקמתם. We don’t talk about any people leading or winning the war, because we realize it was all from Hakadosh Baruch Hu. That’s the hallel v’hoda’ah that we give: the realization that everything comes from Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

Perhaps this also explains why, in Al Hanissim, we discuss only the war, and we don’t even mention the nes of the pach shemen. The nes of the pach shemen was obviously Hakadosh Baruch Hu’s doing. But we need to stress that the military victory, which could be mistakenly attributed to kochi v’otzem yadi, was also entirely from Hashem. That’s the hoda’ah, the admission and thanks that we’re giving.

A Yid, we know, is called a “Yehudi,” which comes from the root hoda’ah — thanking Hakadosh Baruch Hu. Interpreting the passuk יְהוּדָה אַתָּה יוֹדוּךָ אַחֶיךָ, in Parashas Vayechi, the Targum Yonasan ben Uziel writes: יְהוּדָה אַנְתְּ אוֹדֵיתָא עַל עוּבְדָא דְתָמָר בְּגִין כֵּן לָךְ יְהוֹדוּן אֲחָךְ וְיִתְקְרוּן יְהוּדָאִין עַל שְׁמָךְ — because you, Yehudah, admitted to your actions in the incident with Tamar, your brothers will acknowledge you as a melech, and Jews will be named after you.

The title “Yehudi,” then, is a reflection of Yehudah’s admission of wrongdoing. We learn from this that the underlying root of giving hoda’ah, thanks, to Hashem is admitting to the good He has done for us.

A Yid recognizes the massive gift that Hakadosh Baruch Hu has given us by separating us from all other nations and choosing us as the am hanivchar. The more we acknowledge our uniqueness, and Hashem’s great kindness in choosing us as His people, the more we’ll be filled with hallel v’hoda’ah to Him. And the more we acknowledge the goodness we receive from Him, the more complete our hoda’ah to Him will be, and that will cause us to experience true inner joy.

The Battle Of The Ego

Why does the story of Yehuda and Tamar interrupt the narrative of Yosef?  The Gemarah Sotah (13a) says כָּל הָעוֹשֶׂה דָּבָר וְלֹא גְּמָרוֹ רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר אַף מוֹרִידִין אוֹתוֹ מִגְּדוּלָּתוֹ דִּכְתִיב וַיְהִי בָּעֵת הַהִיא וַיֵּרֶד יְהוּדָה רַבִּי שְׁמוּאֵל בַּר נַחְמָנִי אָמַר אַף קוֹבֵר אִשְׁתּוֹ וּבָנָיו דִּכְתִיב וַתָּמׇת בַּת שׁוּעַ אֵשֶׁת יְהוּדָה וְגוֹ׳ וּכְתִיב וַיָּמׇת עֵר וְאוֹנָן.  Why is Yehuda worthy of such punishment, at least he advised not to kill Yosef?  And what is the middah kineged middah?  

The Midrash says that since Yehuda said to Yaakov הכר נא הכתונת בנך היא therefore he was embarrassed by Tamar saying הכר נא למי החתמת והפתילים והמטה.  What is the connection between these two episodes besides the shared words? 

Many books say that the parshiot of Yosef and Yehuda are the two battling over the malchut of Klal Yisrael. 

The yesod of malchut is לית ליה מגרמיה כלום.  Malchut is a reflection of the people.  A melech does not have his own essence, he is a vessel to channel and funnel the light, ideas and opinions of others.

The brothers heard saw Yosef as an egoist who was trying to seize power for himself.  Therefore, they viewed him as unfit and in fact a threat to the malchut and determined to get rid of him.  Yehuda, the melech, should have put a stop to that idea and realizes that their cheshbon was not 100% honest but was tinged by their own jealousy.  However, Yehuda's judgement was clouded by his own ego and therefore he did not entirely halt the effort to do away with Yosef and only stopped him from being killed.  Since Yehuda was not a mere reflection of the truth but he thrust his own self into the equation he lost them malchut (Rashi on Chumash says the brothers demoted him, on the Gemarah he says שמים demoted him, see Maharsha.)  The same type of averah is what his children did.  They did not want to produce children for it was not beneficial for them.  They were continuing in the mistake Yehuda made by selling Yosef (see Maharsha Sotah says they were אוחז מעשה אבותיהם בידיהם, maybe that is the explanation.)  Therefore, Yehuda's children were taken away from him for they were also not acting worthy of their status (based upon Bishveley Haparsha by Rabbi Shmuel Divar.) 

The tikkun of Yehuda was to admit that he impregnated Tamar and face his own personal embarrassment.  He put aside his own chesbon and did what was right.  The הכר נא was giving him the opportunity to correct the הכר נא he said to Yaakov.  In the first instance, he let his own well-being get the better of himself but the second time he put himself aside before others.  Furthermore, the very items that הכר נא was about allude to this tikkun. The garment which Yaakov was told הכר נא was the כתונת פסים which was a symbol of the malchut of Yosef.  The brothers tried to rip away any claim of Yosef to the malchut and they removed his כתונת פסים.  The siman of Yehuda's malchus was in his חותם, פתיל ומטה (see Ramban,) and he had to literally take back his malchut by nullifying himself for someone else (based upon Birchat Yitzchak.) 

The malchus comes from Yehuda for the Yehuda recognized his mission to be nullyified before others.  That is why his name is made of the name of Hashem plus a ד which stands for דל for he recognizes that he has nothing and everything is from Hashem.  That is part of the celebration of Chanukah.  Even as we feel uplifted with הלל, at the same time it comes with הודאה, the acknowledgement that the celebration is not due to our own accomplishments but due to Hashem allowing us to be victorious (based upon Or Gedalyahu Chanukah oas 13.)

Monday, December 12, 2022

Celebrate The Struggle

After Yaakov fights with the angle, he names him Yisrael כי שרית אם אלקים ואנשים ותוכל.  If the point is that Yaakov was able to even be victorious over angles, he should have been named תוכל for he was victorious? Rav Leibel Eger explains that the point isn't the victory, the point is the battle.  Klal Yisrael is named for the fact that they are willing to put up a fight no matter what stands in the way. 

The Tanya Ch. 27 says וְלָכֵן, אַל יִפּוֹל לֵב אָדָם עָלָיו, וְלֹא יֵרַע לְבָבוֹ מְאֹד, גַּם אִם יִהְיֶה כֵּן כָּל יָמָיו בְּמִלְחָמָה זוֹ, כִּי אוּלַי לְכָךְ נִבְרָא, וְזֹאת עֲבוֹדָתוֹ לְאַכֽפָּיָא לְסִטְרָא אָחֳרָא תָּמִיד.  One who spends their entire life having to fight against the impulses, desires and urges of the yetzer harah should not feel bad for that is one's avodah.  One is put in the world in order to fight against the yetzer harah.  

The Tanya (which is finished today by those that follow the yearly cycle,) champions the battle of the banyoni.  It is not only the victory that one must celebrate but the fact that one puts up a fight and struggles against the yetzer harah is itself worthy of celebration. 

Thursday, December 8, 2022

The Place Of Connection

ויבא יעקב שלם עיר שכם אשר בארץ כנען בבאו מפדן ארם ויחן את פני העיר.  The Gemarah Shabbat (33b) says אמר רב מטבע תיקן להם ושמואל אמר שווקים תיקן להם ור' יוחנן אמר מרחצאות תיקן להם.  Why was this the first thing Yaakov did after his fight?  

Rashi Vayetze (28:17) says the ladder that Yaakov saw hit in the middle opposite Yerushalayim.  Why is that the point that is the middle of the ladder?  The Maharal explains that the Mikdash is the meeting place between the gashmi and the ruchani.  The Mikdash is a physical place for the most intense spirituality in the world to rest.  It is the meeting place of gashmi and ruchani in this world.  Yaakov is given a message that the gashmiut and ruchniut of Yaakov go hand in hand.  His pursuit of marriage is not separate from that of his years in Yeshiva but they go together.  

The angel of Esav thought he had an opening to attack Yaakov because of the wealth and possessions he accumulated.  He thought that the gashmi of Yaakov was a contradiction to the ruchani of Yaakov and hence he could attack (see Kli Yakar.)  However, for Yaakov the gashmi was יש לי כל, it was what Hashem gave him to complete his mission.  Therefore, after the battle, Yaakov demonstrates that the gashmi needs of the city can go together with his spiritual state and תיקן להם, he made a תיקון for their gashmi needs as well.  Rav Kook says this was בדיוק in שכם for Shechem is the place of the split form malchut Beit David.  Rav Kook views that as a split from the Beit David way, the Torah law, to create a social law and Yaakov was setting up the tikkun for this by combining the two.     

The first Shem Mishmuel in Vayetze says it is Yaakov that established arvit for the kaparah of the korban is in the blood which is an avodah which must be done in the day.  The blood atones for the  nefesh כי הדם הוא הנפש.  The other parts of the animal correspond to the guf so there was no tefillah of arvit where they may be burnt.  Only Yaakov raised himself that even his guf, his geshem, is ruchani and established the prayer of arvit. 

Friday, December 2, 2022

A Long Journey Home

Why is Vayetzeh a parsha סתומה?  The break between parshiot means there is a break; one episode has concluded and another one starts.  Yaakov didn't view his separation from his parents as a new episode.  He didn't view his personal golut as a new chapter in his life but rather it was a long journey to get back to Eretz Yisrael.  According to the Seforno, the episode at the end of the parsha of the different names of the stones of the peace treaty between Yaakov and Lavan are to tell us that Yaakov did not become assimilated to speak the language of Lavan as his official language.  He remained tied to his roots in Eretz Yisrael, to lashon hakodesh.  

In the beginning of the parsha it says about Yaakov ויפגע במקום and at the end of the parsha it says ויפגעו בו מלאכי אלקים.  This is a stark contrast.  In the beginning, Yaakov is unsure about maintaining his level of kedusha outside his zone.  For him to experience a meeting with the Shechina on the way to establish a family was a chiddush.  It was ויפגע, a deep impression was made upon in this meeting.  By the end of the parsha, after he has an established family with the level of kedusha that he started with, then it is a chiddush for the malachim to see that.  For the malachim it is a pelah, the impression was made upon them (based upon Rav Hirsch.)  

How does Yaakov maintain his commitment to his starting place?  By perfecting himself before leaving. ויצא יעקב מבאר שבע.  The Midrash (68:7) says מבארה של שבועה.  As discussed a few weeks ago, there is a relationship between seven and an oath.  When one takes a שבועה, they are committing to put all their 7 כוחות into the matter.  That is what Chazal are telling us.  Yaakov perfected himself in all 7 middot before leaving.  (That may be why he offered to serve Lavan for 7 years, (see Seforno and Chuzkuni,) for he wished to bring the completion of his middot into his marriage.)  Because of his perosnla work Yaakov was able to not be deterred through his golut.  (See first Sfas Emes and Or Gedalyahu.)

Thursday, December 1, 2022

Why Yaakov Connected With Rachel

From Mishnas Reb Aharon volume 3 on Chinuch where he goes through a view difficult parshiot and explains them. 









Interestingly, according to the Kabbalah, Rachel is identified with עולם הדיבור, עלמא דאיתגליא and Leah is identified as עולם המחשבה, עלמא דאיתכסיא.  Though if I understand correctly that means that Rachel wears her tzidkut openly.  The Torah's description of her physical beauty is a reflection of her spiritual shine.  She is the "tzaddik" mode who serves Hashem without having to constantly battle.  Leah is described as עיני לאה רכות, she was crying.  Her beaty is not obvious.  She has to work on herself, to cry, to pray, to become like the tzaddik.  She aligns more with the "baal teshuva" model (see Torah Or ד"ה וללבן שתי בנות, Likutay Sichos Vayishlach volume 35 sicha 3.)  According to Bresov, they represent the avodah of Torah and tefillah.  It is the one who learns Torah who even outwardly is clearly connecting to Hashem.  It is when engaged in tefillah where one has to bring out from within themselves the connection.  That is why Yaakov wanted Rachel for that was מין במינו as opposed to Leah who had a shot at dealing with Esav.  (Which may be why Chazal are critical of Yaakov not giving Dinah a chance with Esav.)  However, Leah elevated herself to be with Yaakov as well.  Klal Yisrael had to be founded with both of the אמהות.  Sometimes we are in Rachel mode and sometimes we are in Leah mode.  Both are part of our avodat Hashem.  

The Place

 From the sefer of R' Genack - Birchat Yitzchak 



Caring For Others

Why did Yaakov call the shepherds, who he had just encountered, אחי if he had no connection to them?  What did Yaakov see in Rachel that immediately made him know this was to be his wife?  Why was Yaakov asking about the well? 

The Or Hachayim (in first peshat,) says that Yaakov asked about the shepherds not opening the well because he was considered about the צער בעלי חיים of the sheep.  Rav Yaakov Kamenetsky explains that since Yaakov was about to give the shepherds rebuke, he started out with nice words so that they would listen to his rebuke.

I saw in the name of Rav Shlomo Carlebach says Yaakov saw Rachel was באה אם הצאן, she wasn't רועה את הצאןת, she led them gently without force.  That is what told Yakaov this was the right wife for him.  It was about caring even for the animals, for strangers, that told Yaakov this was the right one. 

Friday, November 25, 2022

20 Years Of Adjustment

The Yerushalmi Bikkurim (3:3, 11b in the Vilna edition for those that didn't decide to change the pagination to fit their needs,) derives from Esav's marriage to מחלת from the word מחול that a chatan's sins are forgiven (see Torah Temima's explanation of the derash.)  The Midrash says Esav was מגייר and therefore obtained forgiveness.  The Mahari Basan (Lalchmay Todah siman 5) cited by Gilyonai Hashas Shabbat (89b) says that just as there is no punishment from shamayim until a person is 20 years old, so too a chatan who is likened to a ger who is likened to a newborn child, is given a 20-year pass from the time one gets married.  This is quite incredulous to say one can get married and have a 20-year pass.  Nonetheless, it could be that is what he holds.

In light of the opinion of the Gra about punishments from shamayim under 20 it is maybe more understandable.  The Gra (Even Shlema 10:26) says punishment isn't meted out until 20 years but from 20, one is held accountable for what they did in the past.  In other words, it takes 20 years for a person to develop enough to realize the errors of their past and they are expected to do teshuva during that time.  if one doesn't repent, then they're held culpable retroactively.  So too, says the Mari Basan, it takes 20 years for a person to fully adjust to one's new married life and therefore one is given 20 years to fix the problems that he causes in that timeframe.  We see that it takes 20 years to adjust to being married, ודו"ק.

Wednesday, November 23, 2022

Pray Like A Rich Man

 In last week's parsha, Yitzchak prayer is expressed as sicha, ויצא יצחק לשוח בשדה.  In this week's parsha, the prayer of Yitzchak is expressed as ויעתר.  Why are the two situations associated with different terminologies of prayer?  Furthermore, the prayer of sicha is associated with a poor person, תפילה לעני כי יעטוף ולפני ה ישפוך  שיחו  but עטר the Midrash (63:5) associates with praying with wealth, וַיֶּעְתַּר יִצְחָק לַה' לְנֹכַח אִשְׁתּוֹ (בראשית כה, כא) ,רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר שֶׁשָּׁפַךְ תְּפִלּוֹת בְּעשֶׁר?

What is tefillah בעושר?  The Alter from Kelm (Chachma U'mussar volume 2 #1):













According to the Alter, tefillah is an avodah on one's Emunah.  It is an avodah of strengthening one's faith in Hashem's running of the world.  That is what it means to pray from עושר.  One is not praying due to a lacking of something, one feels that they have all like a עשיר, one is praying to remind themselves of their faith.   

I was thinking that there must be a difference between the prayer of Yitzchak when he is set to find his shidduch which is something that occurs in the natural world where a sicha is more appropriate to beseech for that event to occur vs. praying for his wife's closed womb to be opened which would not be a natural occurrence where a עטר, a constant prayer, reminder that it is Hashem's will for whatever is best to happen is better suited.  However, I'm not sure if that chiluk really explains the issue. 

Rav Asher Arieli Haskama

 Printed in the Sefer עלי הגיון:




Tuesday, November 22, 2022

Sicha As A (Non)Prayer

 Risiysa Laylah Ch. 31 ונראה דלשון שיחה הוא דבור שמן השפה ולחוץ ולא ממעמקי הלב שזה נקרא דבור. ולכך תפלת יצחק אבינו ע"ה נקרא לשוח (ברכות כו:) כי אברהם אבינו ע"ה שהוא המתחיל בתפלה היינו דוקא בכוונה שלימה נקרא עמידה כטעם מאמר רז"ל (סוטה יג סוף ע"ב) מה להלן עומד ומשמש כו' כי עמידה הוא רק לעבודה. ויצחק בא והוסיף דגם תפלה שלא בכוונה הוא תפלה וזהו דרגא דידיה דמחוי להו הקב"ה בעיניהו (שבת פט:) איך מלא כל הארץ כבודו ממש לנוכח העין. ובהכרה ברורה כזו אין שוב נפקא מינה בכונת לבו כמ"ש (ירושלמי ברכות פרק ב הלכה ד) אנא מן יומי לא כוונית כו' כי כאשר יש לו הכרה ברורה כזו זו כונה כוללת על כל מחשבותיו ודבוריו ומעשיו אף שיחת חולין שלו הכל מהשם יתברך לבד ואין עוד מלבדו ואין שום נפקא מינה בכונה כך או כך להשתדל על זה רק להניח הכל על השם יתברך ולהשתדל רק בעיקר הכונה דשויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד ממש לנגדי. ואז ממילא כאשר מקיים גול וגו' ויכונו וגו'. וזה נקרא דבר שאין מתכוין ולא מתעסק בעלמא דהרי מכל מקום צריך כונה כוללת כנ"ל וצריך לידע שהולך להתפלל וכמ"ש ויצא יצחק לשוח. שבאברהם היה עמידה דהיינו כל התפלה וביצחק רק יציאה

Rabbi Shimsohn Pinkus (this week's parsha, maamarim)























Sfas Emes (Chayeh Saraeh 5645) במדרש יפה שיחתן של עבדי אבות כו' כי יש בחי' עבד ובן. תורה ותפלה. ובני ישראל נקראו בנים שניתן להם התורה לחפש בגנזי דמלכא כבן. ותפלה היא עבודה ונקרא שיחה כמ"ש רז"ל לשוח בשדה. שהוא מעסקי האדם הצריך לו בעוה"ז ונקרא בגמ' חיי שעה והתורה חיי עולם. אכן ב' אלו המדריגות יש בהם כמה בחי'. ויש עבד ובן. אח"כ זוכין למעלת עבד בעולם העליון יותר. ואח"כ בן. וכן הוא תמיד. ובאופן זה אמרו כי יפה שיחתן של עבדי אבות שבחי' העבדות שלהם הי' גבוה מבחי' בן של דורות האחרונים שהרי משיחתן ותפלתן נעשה פרשיות בתורה.  

Sfas Emes (Chayeh Saraeh 5651) במדרש יפה שיחתן של עבדי אבות כו'. הוא בחי' תפלה אין שיחה אלא תפלה דאיתא בגמ' תורה חיי עולם ותפלה חיי שעה. וזה הדרך שתקנו אבות והוא עצה להיות נושע בכל עת ומקום. ובמדרש מי בכם ירא ה' שומע בקול עבדו כו'. שמזה הדרך של אליעזר יכולין ללמוד להיות נושע אף במקום החושך. הלך חשכים. ומעין זה בכל איש ישראל שנשתלח' הנשמה בעוה"ז עלמא דחשוכא. וע"י תפלה ותורה שבע"פ יכולין להיות נושע. והוא דרך ימי המעשה שנק' חשכים. והכל ניתקן בבחי' עבדות והנהגה מלמעלה על ידי מלאך. ובשבת קודש הוא בחי' בנים. ודרך התורה. וההנהגה על ידי הקב"ה בעצמו. לכן שבת יעשה כולו תורה. ובימי המעשה הוא בחי' שומע בקול עבדו. וע"י אמונה ובטחון כמ"ש יבטח בשם ה' כו'

There seems to be a dichotomy is sicha viewed as a lowly form of tefillah, a mere utterance of the words so it is not registered on the tefillah meter or it is such a great form of tefillah that it isn't measured because it exceeds the bar of tefillah.  I think that it isn't a contradiction but שיחה goes מריש כל דרגין עד סוף כל דרגין.  Sicha is a mere utterance of words without much intent.  It is more of talking to one's self than talking to Hashem.  That may be because the person feels so distant from Hashem that one doesn't feel that they can talk to Him or because one is so close to Hashem that they are always talking to Him even when not expressed in a formal manner.  The sicha of Yitzchak was due to his great closeness to Hashem he did not need to utter a formal prayer but the צורת התפילה is the same for one who feels quite distant. 

תְּ֭פִלָּה לְעָנִ֣י כִֽי־יַעֲטֹ֑ף וְלִפְנֵ֥י י֝״י֗ יִשְׁפֹּ֥ךְ שִׂיחֽוֹ (Tehillim 102:2.)  Sicha is the tefillah of the עני, the עני is אין עני אלא בדעת (Nedarim 41a.)  When is lacking daat, lacking a connection to Hashem, and can only muster up sicha, some words of desperation, that tefillah Yitzchak teaches us, enables for us perhaps, that it will be accepted.  Those words of calling out from whatever the trouble is, as the Sfas Emes says, become better than תורתן של בנים for it allows one to become connected to Hashme even in a state of great darkness. 

Thursday, November 17, 2022

Get Up

ויקם אברהם מעל פני מתו וידבר אל בני חת לאמר.  Why does it have to say Avraham got up, obviously he wasn't sitting in the same spot?  It doesn't mean merely that Avraham stood up. It means he aroused himself, he was able to move on from his grief and figure out the next step.  Rav Yeruchem in a mussar vein takes this as a lesson in interpersonal relationships.  It would not be not be becoming of Avraham to speak with the people in a state of misery and teary eyed.  Avraham got up, he wiped of his face and put on a descent face to talk to the people properly.  

The Gemarah Bava Bathra (91a-b) says ואמר רב חנן בר רבא אמר רב אותו היום שנפטר אברהם אבינו מן העולם עמדו כל גדולי אומות העולם בשורה ואמרו אוי לו לעולם שאבד מנהיגו ואוי לה לספינה שאבד קברינטא (דברי הימים א כט, יא).  Why did the world cry over Avraham, they disagreed with him, he was העברי, apart from everyone else?  Because despite his philosophical differences, he still cared for everyone and dealt with them as such.  The world recognized that and bemoaned the loss of their protector, friend and leader (on the two descriptions of the Gemarah see here.) 

Rabbi Lord Sacks (who's yartzeit was Monday,) applies this a general lesson as how to move beyond personal tragedy.  One must not wallow and sit in a state of misery but be able to get up and do something to be able to move forward in life.  He contrasts the actions of Avraham with that of Noach who after the flood got drunk, he let the misery he felt get the better of him and that literally stagnated his growth.  Of course dealing with loss and tragedy is difficult but after the proper time is allotted to deal with it one must take a step forward to continue growing.

Good Eye

וְהָיָ֣ה הַֽנַּעֲרָ֗ אֲשֶׁ֨ר אֹמַ֤ר אֵלֶ֙יהָ֙ הַטִּי־נָ֤א כַדֵּךְ֙ וְאֶשְׁתֶּ֔ה וְאָמְרָ֣ה שְׁתֵ֔ה וְגַם־גְּמַלֶּ֖יךָ אַשְׁקֶ֑ה אֹתָ֤הּ הֹכַ֙חְתָּ֙ לְעַבְדְּךָ֣ לְיִצְחָ֔ק וּבָ֣הּ אֵדַ֔ע כִּי־עָשִׂ֥יתָ חֶ֖סֶד עִם־אֲדֹנִֽי.  The siman for the right one is not only does she give Eliezer to drink as was requested of her but she adds that she will give the camels water.  The Kli Yakar cleverly notes that the word גמל is close to the words גמילות חסד as a hint that this proves she is a real chesed oriented individual.  Why does she have to add beyond the request of Eliezer to prove she is a baalat chesed?  The Kli Yakar says because doing chesed even with a being that's not her species, out of her orbit, proves she is a real baalat chesed and not just looking out for her own.  Some say that when one helps out someone who is in a state of need that may just be because one feels sorry for the other person.  It is a real chesed, a giving just to give, when one does chesed even if the other person doesn't need help.  Eliezer was a weary traveler and asked for water so Rivka may just feel bad for him and give him to drink.  It is only when she goes beyond that which the other person needs that proves she is helping just in order to do chesed.  I would just add that although she was not bound by a request of Eliezer, a young girl may feel intimated to grant the request of an elderly man such as Eliezer.  However, to add to his request proves she is a baalat chesed. 

The Kli Yakar adds רז״ל אמרו (תענית כד.) כל כלה שעיניה יפות כל גופה אין צריך בדיקה. וזה דבר שהחוש מכחיש כי כמה מכוערות בעולם שעיניהן יפות. ועוד קשה מה ראו חז״ל על ככה ליתן עצה לבדוק אחר יופי חיצוני זה והלא שקר החן והבל היופי, אלא ודאי שנתנו עצה לבדוק אחר מעשיה וזאת העצה היעוצה שיבדוק אם היא בעלת עין יפה וגומלת חסדים, כי אם עיניה יפות בבריות, אז היא בלי ספק שלימה בכל המדות, ולמדו רז״ל מן אליעזר שלא בדק את רבקה כי אם במדה זו כי מדה זו בנין אב על כל המדות.

I saw in the sefer Bishviley Haparsha that this may also be hinted to by the terminology the Torah uses.  Eliezer meets Rivka at a spring of water, normally called a באר which is the word used in pessukim 11,20.  However, many more times during the episode it is called עין המים.  Why is this terminology used?  He suggests it is hinting to this idea, to look at the eye.  To see is she has a good eye (not in baseball,) to be a giving person (see more about the relationship here.) 

[It is still צ"ע why it switches from באר to עין and back and as pointed out in the linked article, Hagar is approached by the malach at the עין המים and she calls it באר לחי רואי, why the switch?  (See the Malbim by the episode of Hagar here, but that doesn't seem to help us in our parsha.)   See also here a connection between Yitzchak and באר לחי רואי.]

We see from the hanhaga in this episode that was most important to check into the prospective shidduch was if the girl is a baalat chesed. 

The Pillar of Stability

Harav Hagaon Yosef Elefant Shlita

The passuk says: וְאַבְרָהָם זָקֵן בָּא בַּיָּמִים. The simple meaning of this phrase is that Avraham Avinu was growing old, getting on in years. But the Zohar Hakadosh interprets this phrase to mean that Avraham Avinu “came with all his days” — when he reached the end of his life, he brought all his days with him, not losing any of them. This means that he utilized his opportunities, but it means, primarily, that he created a consistency: All his days were a continuum.

In other words, the ability to come with all one’s days is not merely a sign that the person maximized his potential; it also means that he kept on growing constantly.  What is the secret that enables a person to “come with all his days”?

In last week’s parashah, after Sedom is overturned, the Torah says: וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם אֶת פְּנֵי ה'. Chazal derive a few insights from this passuk. From the words אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם, the Gemara (Berachos 6b) derives that Avraham Avinu established a makom kavua for his prayer, and teaches that whoever establishes a makom kavua for davening receives Hashem’s assistance: כל הקובע מקום לתפלתו אלקי אברהם בעזרו.

Now, the simple meaning is that Avraham Avinu had a geographical makom kavua where he davened. But there’s a deeper message here as well, and that is reflected in another teaching of Chazal in connection with this passuk. Chazal link this passuk with the passuk in Tehillim that states: מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה' וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ. The words מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה' allude to Avraham at the Akeidah, say Chazal, while the words וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ allude to Avraham’s holding onto his position and staying there, as the passuk says: וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם.

A person can reach incredible heights, as Avraham did at the Akeidah — that’s מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה'. In contrast, ּוּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ refers to a person who’s stable and steady, holding onto his position and staying there. At times, it can be relatively easy to climb the mountain, but it’s a lot harder to stay in that place and hold onto that level. In expounding the words וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם, Chazal praise Avraham for returning to the place where he was the day before. On that day, Avraham davened, but Hashem didn’t accept his tefillos. Yet he got up the next morning and continued from the same place where he had been the previous day.

This would seem to be a pretty simple act on Avraham’s part: He davened in the same place where he davened the day before. Yet this is the act that Chazal point to as the paradigm of holding on steadily to one’s spiritual level: וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ.

Sometimes we think that in order to hold onto one’s level, a person has to make major, dramatic changes. Yet Chazal are telling us that just davening in the same place that you davened the day before creates stability. Long-term growth and consistency in avodas Hashem is not built on dramatic changes; it’s based on a person’s daily routine, doing the same thing day after day, davening in the same place and the same situation.

Avraham returned to the same place even though he had failed the day before. That’s the secret of consistency — not starting each time anew, but taking a position and going with it. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t. Sometimes the tefillah is heard, and sometimes it’s not. The secret of אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם sheds light on Chazal’s other statement that whoever establishes a makom kavua for davening receives Hashem’s assistance. Chazal don’t just mean an actual geographic location where a person sits each time he davens; they are referring to a person who has successfully created a consistency, and isn’t jumpy, doing things one day like this and one day like that.

A third teaching that Chazal derive from these words is that Avraham instituted the tefillah of Shacharis. Amidah is a lashon of prayer, so the words אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם indicate that Avraham davened. Yitzchak, we know, instituted Minchah, as the passuk in this week’s parashah says, וַיֵּצֵא יִצְחָק לָשׂוּחַ בַּשָּׂדֶה, while Yaakov instituted Maariv: וַיִּפְגַּע בַּמָּקוֹם.

The Sfas Emes notes that these tefillos parallel the attributes of each of the Avos. Avraham’s middah was ahavah; Hashem referred to him אַבְרָהָם אֹהֲבִי, as we read in last week’s haftarah. Yitzchak’s middah was yirah — Pachad Yitzchak, and Yaakov’s middah was emes. The Sfas Emes explains that the reason Yaakov instituted Maariv, specifically, is that emes — which is ויצית ונכון וקיים — implies the creation of something lasting. Yaakov Avinu’s tefillah is at the end of the day, when a person wraps up his avodah, so that he can perpetuate and hold onto whatever he achieved during the day.

Yitzchak’s tefillah, Minchah, is said during the day. The words וַיֵּצֵא יִצְחָק לָשׂוּחַ בַּשָּׂדֶה implies that he’s out in the field, doing his everyday tasks. For that you need yirah; ahavah doesn’t work when you’re out on the street.

But Avraham Avinu is ahavah. The Sfas Emes explains that וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר means that before he did anything else, he davened to Hakadosh Baruch Hu. That’s ahavah: putting the loved one before all other activities. When Avraham Avinu got up early in the morning and davened, he showed his ahavah for Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

The power of Shacharis, in all generations, is putting Hakadosh Baruch Hu before all other interests. That’s run by the engine of ahavah.

Regarding the words (Yeshayah 41:8): אַבְרָהָם אֹהֲבִי, Rashi comments that Avraham Avinu is called ohavi because he had no one to teach him; he came to know Hashem through his love for Him. No one gave him tochachah; he had no rebbi or father to teach him. What powered him was the engine of ahavah, and that ahavas Hashem brought him to recognize Hashem.

We generally think it was the other way around — Avraham recognized Hashem, and that brought him to ahavah. But Rashi is telling us the opposite: Avraham’s love for Hakadosh Baruch Hu, after seeing Him in the briah, propelled him to an immense love for Him, and that led him to all his intellectual attainments. This idea is reflected in the words וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר.

So, we have three derashos on this passuk: establishing a makom kavua for davening, Avraham returning to his place of the previous day — וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ, and his instituting Shacharis with an act of ahavah, וַיַּשְׁכֵּם, prioritizing Hakadosh Baruch Hu before anything else. And that ahavah explains the consistency of Avraham Avinu.

The more we develop our ahavas Hashem, and the more we look at the briah and see the chessed that Hakadosh Baruch Hu has done for us, the more we can create the וַיַּשְׁכֵּם, the to place the Eibishter before anything else. And that’s the engine that creates the וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ and the קובע מקום לתפלתו . The consistency of the relationship is a derivative of the ahavah that a person awakens in himself for Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

This is what it means that Avraham Avinu was בָּא בַּיָּמִים, he came with all his days. He was a pillar of consistency, stability, and continuity: אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם. And he was a pillar of Ahavah.

Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Think About It

 Shulchan Aruch Alter Rebbe Ch. 2 law 12:  

 וכל אדם צריך ליזהר להוציא בשפתיו ולהשמיע לאזניו כל מה שלומד בין במקרא משנה ותלמוד אלא אם כן בשעת עיון להבין דבר מתוך דבר וכל מה שלומד בהרהור לבד ואפשר לו להוציא בשפתיו ואינו מוציא אינו יוצא בלימוד זה ידי חובת מצות ולמדתם אותם וכמ"ש לא ימוש ספר התורה הזה מפיך והגית בו וגו' וכמו בכל המצות התלויות בדבור שאינו יוצא בהן ידי חובתו בהרהור אלא אם כן שומע מפי המדבר שהשומע כעונה בפיו. אך אם מוציא בשפתיו אף על פי שאינו מבין אפילו פירוש המלות מפני שהוא עם הארץ הרי זה מקיים מצות ולמדתם ולפיכך כל עם הארץ מברך ברכת התורה בשחר לפני הפסוקים וכן כשעולה לספר תורה.

The simple read is that one fulfills Talmud Torah only when speaking the words.  The Rebbe says that what it is saying is one doesn't fulfill ולמדתם אותם but there is a kium of והגית.  

The Rebbe (Chiddushhim Ubiurin Beshas VeRambam siman 18) footnote 21:


I don't understand where do we see that והגית is a separate mitzvah of learning Torah?  This is reminiscent of a past post here

Looking Toward The Future

From Rav Kook

 לז. קדושת הזווג והמשפחה

מצד קדושת המעשה וקדושת המחשבה, הפועלת לקבע קדושת הטבע והרצון ביסוד יסודו, עד לקדושת הזיווג בעצמות הטבע הטהור והקדוש, כדוגמת האדם לפני החטא, ולמעלה למעלה גם על ידי השאיפה לקדושת עולמים זו, מתעדן כל הקישור הנפשי, ויחס המשפחה מתקשר בחוטי קודש קדשים, שהם חזקים ואמיצים מאד, וגורם שפע חיים ארוכים לתולדותיו. ומיסוד צדיק כזה מושפע שפע החיים והעדינות, העז והאומץ, וגם ישות החיים בגדולה, וגוברת עז על כל החיים, על כל הנלווים אליו, על כל הדור, על כל העולם. אומץ מוסיף אומץ, חיים ממשיכים חיים, כבוד ותפארת מזהיר תפארת והדרת קודש על כל.

לח. הנטיה המינית לעתיד

הנטיה המינית הולכת היא וזורמת אל העתיד, אל שכלול החיים, שיביא הזמן, את חיי העולם הבא בעולם הזה, ומתוך שהחיים העתידים הנם מלאים הוד ונועם מלא, על כן גדולה היא שאיפת החפץ ועז הרצון של נטית עולמים זאת, והקדושה המגמתית רק עליה היא משרה את אורה, והנפש הטהורה מנהגת את נטיה זו למגמתה, בגידור התורה, החכמה, היושר והצניעות, מקורי הצדק. כל מאן דנטיר ברית איקרי צדיק. ויסוד קדושתן של ישראל הוא קשור בעולם העתיד, ורוח קדושה הולך וחופף על כלל האומה ופרטיה. ועמך כלם צדיקים.

Not sure what this means but he attempts to explain why some of the craziness in the world is what it is now.

Friday, November 11, 2022

Innermost Desire

וישא אברהם את עיניו וירא והנה איל אחר נאחז בסבך בקרניו וילך אברהם ויקח את האיל ויעלהו לעלה תחת בנו

Why did the איל Avraham offered as a korban have to be designated on Friday בין השמשות?  Chazal (Pirkey D' Rebbe Eliezer Ch. 30) identifies the horns of the ram as the horn blown at Mattan Torah and the horn of Mashiach.  Why is this ram so important that it is designated to be used for the most important points in history?  

The words אחר seems meaningless, what it does it mean another ram?  Chazal translate the word אחר as in אחרי, afterward; either later in history on Rosh Hashana we should blow the shofar to arose mercy or in the days of the future the horn will be blown to redeem us even though we are stuck in averot.  What does that have to do with the story of Avraham?   .

The nisayon of the Akedah was to prove it Avraham's ultimate passion was for the commandment of Hashem.  The passing of the nisayon established that the pnemious of Avraham was to be attached to Hashem.  His essence, his DNA was connection to Hashem.  He passed that down into the generations that followed.  Therefore, even when our merits can be called not question, when the pitfalls of life may have led us astray, the horn of the ram awakens the pnimious to come out and be worthy of redemption of vindication in judgement.  

This deep inner connection to Hashem was transferred into the ram and that is why it is used for events which are an outgrowth of the connection that Klal Ysirael has.  That is why the ram was created Friday bein hashmashot.  It is the bridge between teva and beyond teva.  The teva is the סיבוך surrounding the ram, the hardships of life.  The מעל לטבע is the pnemious connection that can't be severed. 

Rashi (22:2) cites Chazal say Hashem said to Avraham please pass this test so that people don't say the first one's were nothing.  Why if he failed the akedah are the previous tests meaningless?  Because this test was to see if the pnemious of avraham, if his ultimate desire, when everything else was on the line was with Hashem or not. 

Bowing For Redemption

 The Midrash (56:2) אָמַר רַבִּי יִצְחָק הַכֹּל בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, וְאַבְרָהָם לֹא חָזַר מֵהַר הַמּוֹרִיָּה בְּשָׁלוֹם אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, וְנִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה וְנָשׁוּבָה אֲלֵיכֶם. יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא נִגְאֲלוּ אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות ד, לא): וַיַּאֲמֵן הָעָם וגו' וַיִקְדּוּ וַיִּשְׁתַּחֲווּ. הַתּוֹרָה לֹא נִתְּנָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות כד, א): וְהִשְׁתַּחֲוִיתֶם מֵרָחֹק. חַנָּה לֹא נִפְקְדָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמואל א א, כח): וַיִּשְׁתַּחוּ שָׁם לַה': הַגָּלֻיּוֹת אֵינָן מִתְכַּנְסוֹת אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (ישעיה כז, יג): וְהָיָה בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא יִתָּקַע בְּשׁוֹפָר גָּדוֹל וגו' וְהִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לַה' בְּהַר הַקֹּדֶשׁ בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם. בֵּית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ לֹא נִבְנָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (תהלים צט, ט): רוֹמְמוּ ה' אֱלֹהֵינוּ וְהִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לְהַר קָדְשׁוֹ. הַמֵּתִים אֵינָן חַיִּין אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (תהלים צה, ו): בֹּאוּ נִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה וְנִכְרָעָה נִבְרְכָה לִפְנֵי ה' עֹשֵׂנוּ.

What is the significance of bowing?  It is not the mere physical act of bowing but an inner bowing.  Bowing is an expression of complete subordination before someone else.  By acknowledging that one is totally dependent on Hashem one merits redemption.  See here and Nesivot Shalom. 

Sunday, November 6, 2022

Milah Points

The Bartenura on the Torah (17:24) says וקשה לפי זה למה המתין כל כך למול את עצמו. י"ל משום דהא דאמרינן שקיים כל המצות היינו לאחר שנמול אבל קודם לכן לא היה לו דעת לקיים מצות ולא נפתחו עיני שכלו וכדפרש"י לעיל שלא היה בו כח לסבול גלוי השכינה ולעמוד.  According to the Bartenura, Avraham fulfilled all the mitzvot only after his Milah.  The Maharsha in Yevamot (100b) suggests the same idea to explain how Avraham could marry Hagar, who was a first generation Egyptian, whom one is prohibited from marrying?  He says, it must be Avraham only kept the Torah after his Milah.  (According to the Maharsha it still is difficult how did Avraha marry  קטורה who Chazal identify as Hagar, at that point it was after Avraham's bris?)  See here where he cites Rishonim deal with the question about Hagar.   

According to the Bartenura, the bris milah of Avraham was not a mere mitzvah like any other but it was a transformation of his entire being.  This is supported from the Midrash beginning of Vaerah which comments on the greater level of Avraham after the milah.  

The Gemarah Avodah Zarah (27a) has a machlokes tanaim if Milah has to be done lishma.  The opinion of R' Yose is that it does not.  The Yaavetz asks a contradiction because in Yevamot (46b) R' Yose says if one comes before Beit Din with a milah having been done we can't just do the tevilah part because it is possible the milah was not done lishma.  But R' Yose doesn't hold a milah has to be done lishma?  The Chasam Sofer (Yoreh Deah teshuva #1,300) answers by differentiating between the milah of a yisrael and that of one who wants to be converted.  The regular mitzvah of milah for a Yisrael does not have to be one lishma but to enter into the Jewish nation one requires their milah being done lishma.  The Meshech Chachma (end of Lech Lecha and Bo) also suggests this idea as does Rav Yosef Engel. 

The possuk (17:23) says that Avraham gave all the people in his household a milah and then the last possuk in the parsha (17:27) repeats that Avraham gave them a milah.  Why does it repeat this?  The Ramban says that Avraham first gave everyone else a milah and then he gave himself a milah.  How could he give them a milah if he himself didn't have a milah (according to the opinion in Avodah Zarah that only one who has a milah can give a milah?)  The Chasam Sofer says that since Avraham was intending to get a milah he is considered to have a milah.  But that is only if he ended up getting a milah.  That's what the last possuk means, only after Avraham gave himself a milah was their milah complete (that is how it is נמלו אתו, with his bris their bris was complete as well.) 

The Tosfat Yeshanim in Yevamot asks the question of the Yaavetz and answers that R' Yose said in Avodah Zarah a milah doesn't have to be done lsihma only when a Jew is standing over the gentile telling him to do the milah lishma.  In other words, R' Yose also holds a milah has to be done lishma but it suffices it a gentile does it when a Jew tells him what to do.  This is very difficult to read into the Gemarah Avodah Zarah.  See also Achiezer volume 3 siman 27. 

The Avnei Nazer Yoreh Deah (345 end of the teshuva) takes issue with the Chasam Sofer for (if I understand his question correctly,) for if a milah not done lishma is considered a milah then the ger should be no different from someone who doesn't have an ערלה that wants to become a ger where he just does tevilah?  His question is propitiated on the assumption that there is no הטפת דם ברית in those situations which is a machlokes Rishonim.  But even if those cases don't require הטפת דם ברית here it is worse for in those scenarios the ger doesn't have an ערלה, so he just does tevilah but here the ger was an ערל and a milah no done lishma doesn't remove the ערלה status vis-a-vis gerus.  

R' Yose learns his law of milah lishma from the parsha here (17:13) הִמּ֧וֹל ׀ יִמּ֛וֹל יְלִ֥יד בֵּֽיתְךָ֖ וּמִקְנַ֣ת כַּסְפֶּ֑ךָ וְהָיְתָ֧ה בְרִיתִ֛י בִּבְשַׂרְכֶ֖ם לִבְרִ֥ית עוֹלָֽם, he learns the double verb teaches that circumcision may be performed by anyone.  However, if we put the idea of the Bartenura and the Chasam Sofer together it is difficult for this is the milah of gerus and there everyone requires it to be lishma?

Gilgul Of Women

 From דברי יעקב on ברכות 






From נפשי בשאלתי by Rav Yaakov Lugassy 










Anybody know anything about gilgul of women? 

Thursday, November 3, 2022

A Journey, 7 And An Oath

I said this at a sheva berachot of my cousin this week.  

The Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 11:2) says אָמַר רַבִּי פִּינְחָס בֶּן יָאִיר שֶׁבַע בְּרָכוֹת בֵּרַךְ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אֶת אַבְרָהָם, וְאֵלּוּ הֵן: וְאֶעֶשְׂךָ לְגוֹי גָּדוֹל (בראשית יב, ב): וַאֲבָרֶכְךָ (בראשית יב, ב): וַאֲגַדְלָה שְׁמֶךָ (בראשית יב, ב): וֶהְיֵה בְּרָכָה (בראשית יב, ג): וַאֲבָרְכָה מְבָרְכֶיךָ (בראשית יב, ג): וּמְקַלֶּלְךָ אָאֹר (בראשית יב, ג): וְנִבְרְכוּ בְךָ. כְּנֶגֶד שִׁבְעָה פְּסוּקִים שֶׁבְּמַעֲשֵׂה בְרֵאשִׁית שֶׁכָּתוּב בָּהֶן כִּי טוֹב.  What does the כי טוב of Berashit have to do with Avraham?  

 וַיֹּ֤אמֶר י״י֙ אֶל־אַבְרָ֔ם לֶךְ־לְךָ֛ מֵאַרְצְךָ֥ וּמִמּֽוֹלַדְתְּךָ֖ וּמִבֵּ֣ית אָבִ֑יךָ אֶל־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֥ר אַרְאֶֽךָּ.  The question is, the possuk is out of order, it should have first said בית אביך and end with ארצך because one first leave's their father's house and ends up with leaving the entire country?  The Chassideshe seforim explain that Avraham wasn't just instructed to physically leave his father's country, Avraham is being instructed to leave the ideology of where he came from behind.  The ideology, the spiritual trappings and mindset of a idolator has to be left behind and Avram was to become Avraham, the founder of the Jewish nation.  This transformation doesn't happen merely by taking steps but is a mental process that one goes through.  That process started by Avraham leaving behind the ideology of the general country and continued until he diverged himself of the  false believes of his father.  

Avraham's leaving of Charan going to Eretz Yisrael was his berashit.  It was not just a journey of space but a mental odyssey to transform himself.  There was a לֶךְ to לְךָ֛, for Avraham to discover his inner being.  This was Avraham's berashit, his beginning of creating Klal Yisrael.  That is why the 7 berachot parallel the seven times of כי טוב in Berashit. 

But why 7 berachot, why does he need 7 berachot specifically?  

The Gemarah Niddah (30b) says before the soul comes into the world משביעין אותו תהי צדיק ואל תהי רשע.  What is the point of this oath if no one remembers it and one is given free reign to ignore it?  The Tzemach Tzedek explains that the word שבועה has the root of שבע, satiated, for taking an oath fills one up with power to overcome difficulties.  It helps bring to the forefront dormant abilities within a person as one is deeply committed to the cause so much so they have made an oath to fulfill it.  The challenges of the world are so great that the soul needs the push of the שבועה to help one overcome the challenges thrown at a person.  Similarly, the word for the number 7, שבע is the same root.  As is well known form the Maharal, 7 is the completion of טבע.  It is the full power, the complete satiation of טבע.  The 7 berachot given to Avraham were to give him the push, to give him the ability to bring to the forefront all in his capabilities to stand up to the challenge of being העברי, on the other side of the pressing issues of the day.  It was a slight aid to push Avraham over the edge to be successful in his mission.

Origins Of Shabtai Tzvi

From the Meor Vashemesh Emor

ונראה בזה ע"פ מה דאיתא בגמרא מנין לבעל קרי שאסור בדברי תורה ודרש הגמ' שאף לר' יהודא שאינו דורש סמוכים בכל התורה במשנה תורה דרש ולמדו בגמרא מן והודעת לבניך ולבני בניך וסמיך לי' יום אשר עמדת לפני ה' אלהיך בחורב מה להלן ברתת ובזיע ובאימה וביראה אף כאן באימה וביראה ברתת ובזיע נמצא למידין מכאן שאי אפשר לו לאדם שישיג תכלית יראת ה' אלא אם נזהר בטבילת עזרא וכן פרש"י למעלה בד"ה שאני בהמ"ז הביא רש"י לשנא אחרינא שאני תפלה דלית בי' קבלת מלכות שמים אבל ק"ש דאית בי' קבלת מ"ש שמקבל את הש"י לאדון ולמלך מיוחד אסור להרהר בו עד שיטבול הרי שבלתי אפשר לידע מההיא יראה שילמוד ויתפלל ברתת ובזיע כי אם שיהי' נזהר בטבילת עזרא ואם הוא לומד או מתפלל ואינו נזהר בטבילה זו אי אפשר בשום אופן להגיע לגופי תורה ומצות ואם הוא לומד ספרי קבלה והוא בלתי טהור יוכל לבוא חלילה עי"ז לידי אפיקורסות ובזמנים הקודמים שהי' דבר ה' יקר בימים ההם ולא היו יודעים מיראת הרוממת כלל זאת הי' מחמת שהיו לומדים תורה ולא נזהרו בטבילה זו והכת ש"ץ ימ"ש שהיו אז בימים ההם ומזה נעשו אפיקורסים שלמדו ספרי קבלה בטומאת הגוף והיה העולם שמם עד שבאו שני המאורות הגדולים לעולם הבעש"ט הקדוש ואדמ"ור הרב רבינו אלימלך נבג"מ והם פתחו שער לה' צדיקים יבואו בו שלא יהרהר אדם שום הרהור תורה עד שיטבול עצמו לקריו שחכמי הגמרא לא בטלהו אלא מפני שאין רוב הציבור יכולין לעמוד בה אבל אותן האנשים הרוצים להשיג גופי התורה ומצות צריכין להיות נזהר מאד בטבילה זו

Tuesday, November 1, 2022

Worker And Partner

It was posted in the past that there is a major difference between Avraham and Noach. Avraham made it his practice to teach the ways of Hashem to the world while Noach was not engrossed in teaching people the path to teshuva.  Noach thought it was best to avoid having the actions of those around him rub off on himself while Avraham thought it better to teach others to be like himself.  Why did they have these different attitudes?  And why did Avraham's concern for others extend to praying for them, even wicked people like Sedomites while Noach is criticized in Chazal for not praying for his generation, why did he not Noach not pray for them? 

Rav Pinkus gives a mashal to explain the difference from two different types of people in a business, a partner and a worker.  The partners' bottom line is governed by how successful the business is.  He cares if the business is going in the right direction or not.  The worker doesn't care about the success of the business, he just wants to walk home with a paycheck at the end of the week.  This difference comes to the forefront when there is an emergency such as the building is on fire.  The partner will rush to save the building for that is his investment.  The worker doesn't care about the fire as long as he has a job to return to. 

This was the difference between Noach and Avraham.  Noach was G-d's worker.  He punched in and punched out.  If the world collapses it doesn't matter as long as he gets his check, as long as he is safe.  Avraham was a partner with Hashem.  It mattered to him if Sedom is overturned, if people are worshipping avodah zarah.  He cared about the success of the world, not just his personal success.  He was interested in G-d's business, if the world recognizes Hashem.  Avraham left a yerusha to become a שותף with Hashem, not a mere פועל.  

Thursday, October 27, 2022

Slow Decent

Rav Hirsch: 

חמס הוא גזל שאינו יוצא בדיינים. החומס אינו נידון בבית דין, אך מי שחומס וחוזר וחומס, סופו שהורס את חברו (ראה בראשית רבה לא, ה). כך, ״יַחְמֹס כַּגֶּפֶן בִּסְרוֹ״ (איוב טו, לג): גפן המשיר את פרי הבוסר שלו, עושה חמס לפרי. החמס אינו נעשה בבת אחת, אלא מעט מעט נפסקת יניקת הפרי מהגפן עד שהפרי נושר. בדומה לכך: ״וַיַּחְמֹס כַּגַּן שֻׂכּוֹ״ (איכה ב, ו), המתאר את היחס שבין הגן ובין מחיצת השיחים המקיפה אותו [צמחי הגן מתפשטים ו״חומסים״ את היניקה של שיחי הגדר, עד שגורמים לשיחים לנבול]. ״חמס״ קרוב ל״חֹמץ״, שכן היין אינו מחמיץ בבת אחת, אלא מעט מעט הוא נהפך לחומץ.

והנה אומר כאן הכתוב: ״ותשחת הארץ לפני האלקים ותמלא הארץ חמס״. תחילה באה השחתה רוחנית – חטאים שהחברה האזרחית אינה חוששת להם. אנשים סבורים, שאף בעת שהנוער מופקר וחיי הנשואין רקובים, יפרחו עדיין התעשיה והמסחר, והעסקים יוסיפו להתנהל ביושר. אך משנשחתה הארץ ״לפני האלקים״ עצמו, לא יועילו כל חוקי החברה ומוסדותיה להציל את החברה מאבדון.

Pangs Of Conscience

If the generation of Noach were wicked and did not repent because they laughed off his warnings, why would they wish to stop him from entering the ark if the whole thing was just a hoax in their minds?  The Midrash and Gemarah says that the people in the generation of the flood did not steal outright but rather every individual stole less than a perutah so that they could not be held culpable in court.  If they did not care about having morals, why not just steal outright?  We see that even though the generation was not righteous, they had a guilty conscience.  They didn't just openly steal for they would have felt bad doing so.  Therefore, they only stole an amount that can't be prosecuted which they could justify to themselves.  That is why they felt the need to stop Noach from entering the ark for they knew in their hearts that his prediction was true.  Their conscience knew the truth even if they wouldn't admit it outwardly (Pneneyeh Daat.)  

On the one hand this demonstrates man's inability to do the right thing despite the pains of conscience but on the other hand it means there is a place to start from which the person can get better. 

Why was the rainbow chosen as the sign of the peace treaty of Hashem?  Rav Solevetchik explains that Hashem was teaching Noach.  You couldn't convince the people to do teshuva because you did not believe in them.  You believed they were rotten through and through and could not improve.  (To get someone to repent, you must believe they can.)  You only saw the dark clouds of their behavior.  You did not see how the pains of conscience are a small drop of water that when exposed to the proper light can turn into a bright rainbow (see here and here.)  

Rashi says the mabul was delayed for seven days to allow for time for the eulogy of Meshushelach.  Why is that a reason to delay the flood?  I think the point may be that the hope was the inspiration from hearing the eulogy of such a great man would inspire them to do teshuva.  It was a last hurrah to give the ability to turn things around.  Rav Elyashiv credited some of his greatness to being inspired in his youth from hespidim given for the Ostrovska gaon. 

Rav Leeb Gorvitz says along the lines of the previous idea.  If they are giving hespedim for the loss of Meshushelach, it means the people feel a connection, albeit remote, to Meshushelach's way of life and that connection is reason to delay the flood.

Thursday, October 20, 2022

Make The Man

Why does it say נעשה אדם by the creation of man?  Why were all the animals created with a partner but man was given a wife only later on? 

וייצר ה אלקים אֶת־הָֽאָדָ֗ם עָפָר֙ מִן־הָ֣אֲדָמָ֔ה וַיִּפַּ֥ח בְּאַפָּ֖יו נִשְׁמַ֣ת חַיִּ֑ים וַֽיְהִ֥י הָֽאָדָ֖ם לְנֶ֥פֶשׁ חַיָּֽה.  This possuk describes that there are two aspects to man.  On the one hand man is merely a glob of earth fashioned into a specific shape.  On the other hand, man has a G-dly soul placed in him and he can rise to great heights.  These two opposite forces pull at a person all the time.  Therefore, it is the creation of man about whom it is said נעשה אדם for man is not complete on his own, but has to be made into something better depending on his actions.  That is the difference between man's and the animal's partners.  Animals need partners to merely keep the species alive.  The partner of man is part of the נעשה אדם, is part of making man a better person.  As such, he had to desire and ask for a being to perfect himself. 

Sunday, October 16, 2022

Bound Together

The Gemarah Sukkah (11b) says תניא לולב מצוה לאוגדו ואם לא אגדו כשר אי ר' יהודה כי לא אגדו אמאי כשר אי רבנן אמאי מצוה לעולם רבנן היא ומשום שנאמר (שמות טו, ב) זה אלי ואנוהו התנאה לפניו במצות.  Usually, הדור מצוה is something added to the mitzvah, why then does the beratah indicate there is something lacking in the mitzvah if the lulav is not tied to the other species?  Rashi Sukkah (33b) is of the opinion that the Rabbanan also hold that one needs a real tie of the four species.  Why does one need a real tie if the point is just hiddur mitzvah?  The Gemarah explains the machlokes is that R' Yehuda learns a גז"ש from אגודת אזוב that one needs a tie and the Rabbanan don't accept the gezerah shava.  Even the Rabbanan that don't accept the gezerah shava hold the yesod of the hiddur is in the maaseh לקיחה for the species one is taking to be tied in a bundle.  It is not a hiddur in the cheftah of the lulav but rather in the לקיחה of the lulav.  That is why Rashi holds it needs to be a real tie in order to define it as a אגודה.  This may be why the Rambam never cites the general law of hiddur mitzvah but he does cite the law of tying the lulav (Lulav 7:6) because this is not the regular law of adorning the cheftzah of a mitzvah but adorning the לקיחה.  

What is the idea of binding everything together?  The Midrash says (Emor 30:9) the 4 species all represent Hashem.  We demonstrate through the binding of the species that we are totally bound to Hashem. 

Why is it only after the holiday of Sukkot does Hashem say קשה עלי פרידתכם and we add a day to the holiday?  And how does it help to add a day, that will just make the departure even harder?  Why do we have 7 hakafot on Simchat Torah? 

The Gemarah Taanit (7a) says אמר רב יהודה: גדול יום הגשמים כיום שניתנה בו תורה, שנאמר: "יערוף כמטר לקחי", ואין לקח אלא תורה, שנאמר: "כי לקח טוב נתתי לכם תורתי אל תעזובו". רבא אמר: יותר מיום שניתנה בו תורה, שנאמר: "יערוף כמטר לקחי", מי נתלה במי? – הוי אומר: קטן נתלה בגדול.  What is the comparison between rain and Torah?  The Kozhnitzer Maggid says the Gemarah is referring to Shemini Atzeret, the day we are judged for rain, which is as great or greater than Mattan Torah.  Again, what is the comparison? 

The holiday of Sukkot is the one holiday where we include the gentiles.  We offer sacrifices for them as well.  [The reason being that as opposed to the other festivals which commemorate our leaving Egypt and receiving the Torah which is unique to us, Sukkot also is an agricultural holiday celebrating the harvest and the celebration of nature is something the gentiles can appreciate as well - Meshech Chachma Pinchas.]  Therefore, it needs to be emphasized at the end of the holiday that only we innately matter to Hashem.  How does it help to add a day?  The Shem MiShmuel explains that there are two types of kinyanim.  There is a normal transaction between buyer and seller where the transaction happens and the two parties then walk away.  That is the meeting of the gentiles with Hashem on Sukkot.  They meet and move on.  However, there is another type of kinyan.  That is the kinyan of marriage.  In such a type of kinyan, the parties do not turn around and walk away from each other, on the contrary they are now bound together wherever they go.  That is our relationship with Hashem.  Yes, eventually the music stops, but we take the energy of the Yom Tov with wherever we go.  We designate one day to be alone with Hashme after the guests leave and we take that closeness with us.  That may be the idea of the hakafor on Simchat Torah.  Just as a bride encircles her husband seven times, so too we become united with the Torah and Hashem in the circle 7 times.  

The Gemarah Taanit (10a) says א"י משקה אותה הקב"ה בעצמו וכל העולם כולו ע"י שליח שנאמר (איוב ה, י) הנותן מטר על פני ארץ ושולח מים על פני חוצות.  The rain of E.Y. is called מטר, for other lands it's called מים.  The word מטר is like the word מטרה, there is a target, a purpose.  The rain that comes to E.Y. is a chesed from Hashem.  The rain comes for its own purpose.  The other lands get מים, they get water because they need to exist, it is not a chesed from Hashem.  That is why the coming of rain or Shemini Atzeret is compared to Mattan Torah.  Just as by Mattan Torah, Klal Yisrael was singled out to receive the Torah, the rain is targeted specifically for the needs of people.  S.A. is the time when we are singled out above everyone else in the world to have a special closeness with Hashem and therefore it is likened to Mattan Torah (see Zeav Yitrof Sukkot simanim 70-71.) 

Friday, October 14, 2022

Don't Smell The Hadas

 The Gemarah Sukkah (9a) says that we learn from the possuk 'חג הסוכות שבעת ימים לה that כשם שחל שם שמים על החגיגה כך חל על הסוכה to tell us one is prohibited to benefit from the sukkah.  Tosfos asks that the Gemarah Betzah (30) indicates that the issur is a rabbinic issur because the sukkah is designated for the mitzvah.  Tosfos explains why we need both sevarat of being an issur Torah learned from the possuk and the rabbinic issur of muktzah.  

The Gemarah (37b) says one is allowed to smell an etrog on sukkot since it is designated for eating but not smell a hadas for that is what it is designated for.  Rashi explains that the issue with smelling the hadas is that we learn from sukkah that there is a prohibition to benefit from something designated for a mitzvah.  We see from the Rashi that the yesod of the issur of שחל שם שמים is the issur of הוקצה למצותו not like Tosfos that learns they are two different dinim.  According to Tosfos the issur of שחל שם שמים is a unique issur of hekdesh on a sukkah, according to Rashi it is an issur of being designated for the mitzvah.  This machlokes and נ"מ are further elaborated on in Moadanay Moshe siman 70. 

There is a third approach to the Gemarah (37b) as well.  The Shach (Yoreh Deah 108:22) cites a Mordechai in Pesachim that says we see from the Gemarah that issuray hanah are only prohibited to smell from if they are generally used for smelling.  The Shach asks what is his proof, the Gemarah is an issur of huktzah limitzvato, that is why it is only muktzah for the normal usage but issuray Hanah are always prohibited?  It must be the Mordechai learned the Gemarah is an issur Torah like Rashi but he held the geder of the issur of שחל שם שמים is not like Rashi, a geder of huktzah limitzato, rather like Tosfos that it is an issur of kedusha and yet the Gemarah says it is only assur if it is the normal usage so we see that prohibited things are only assur to smell if it's the normal usage.  The issue is the Rashba Teshuva 849 suggests like the Mordechai.  However, in Teshuva 189 (cited in Aruch Lenair,) he understands that we do not learn out from sukkah to hadas.  So, how did he entertain bringing a prof to issuray hanah from this Gemarah, וצ"ע. 

Lulav And Hallel

In the past, my father discussed the opinion of the Gr"a that one can say a beracha on the lulav without turning the esrog over.  In fact, the Gr"a holds it doesn't help to turn the esrog over since the beracha is on the lulav and the law is one does not need to hold all the species together (651:12,) one has already fulfilled the taking of the lulav before the beracha.  

The Gra (646:1) says the reason the Shulchan Aruch says to take the lulav right before hallel is because the Gemarah Pesachim (117a) says אפשר ישראל נוטלין לולביהן ואין אומרים הלל.  Therefore, one should fulfill their obligation of lulav at the time of hallel.  In the Maaseh Rav with miuim in the back they want to suggest a chiddush based upon this Gra that if one did not have a lulav when saying hallel, when one obtains a lulav they should have to say hallel because lulav is its own מחייב of hallel irrespective of the hallel of the yom tov.  

Saturday, October 8, 2022

Holiday Of The Future

למען ידעו דרתיכם כי בסכות הושבתי את בני ישראל בהוציאי אותם מארץ מצרים.  The fact that it says תדעו means that they will know in the future, why do we sit in the sukkah so the future generations should know, we should sit so we should know?  Why is Sukkot a holiday of such joy?    בסכת תשבו שבעת ימים כל האזרח בישראל ישבו בסכת, why use the term אזרח?  Why is sukkah the mitzvah that the gentiles will be tested with? 

Sukkot is the holiday where we appreciate the journey to the end.  The sukkah is a temporary hut reminding us that our time is this world is just a temporary gateway to the ultimate world.  We are on a journey and it is a process to reach the end.  My great-grandfather wanted to say that is what Kohelet means הבל הבלים , not that the world is meaningless which seems to contradict what the Torah says elsewhere, but that everything must be realized a just a means to the end, not an end in it of itself.  

Sukkot is the holiday which embodies the times of Mashiach.  That is why we offer korbanot even for the gentiles for they will become included in our service in those times. That is why the Torah uses the term אזרח which refers to the shine of the soul because it is those times the soul will radiate.  That is why the Torah stresses the knowledge of the future generations for that is when Sukkot can fully be appreciated.  The great joy of sukkot is that we recognize even now that we have not reached that stage, in our hut outdoors we are able to contemplate that we are on the journey toward reaching that goal.  The gentiles will be tested with sukkah because the message is you want a quick fix, there is a process that must be gone through to appreciate the times of the Mashiach.  Can you appreciate the temporary stages to get there, can you go out in a sukkah?  The gentiles don't want to build up toward the end and they fail the test.  We do understand that we are gazing at the stars looking toward a bright future.  

Friday, October 7, 2022

Raise Yourself Up

The Sifri (306) says ד"א יערף - ר' אליעזר בנו של ר' יוסי הגלילי אומר: אין יערף אלא לשון הריגה, שנא' (דברים כא) וערפו שם את העגלה בנחל. מה עגלה מכפרת על שפיכות דמים - כך דברי תורה מכפרת על שפיכות דמים:

There is another derash later in the Sifri ד"א יערוף כמטר לקחי - היה ר' בנאה אומר: אם עשית דברי תורה לשמם - דברי תורה חיים הם לך, שנאמר (משלי ד) כי חיים הם למוצאיהם ולכל בשרו מרפא; ואם לא עשית דברי תורה לשמן - דברי תורה ממיתים אותך, שנא' יערף כמטר לקחי. ואין עריפה אלא הריגה, שנא' וערפו את העגלה בנחל,  The second derash is understandable that that מטר, referring to the Torah, will יערף, kill someone who doesn't learn lishma.  But how does the first derash make sense in the possuk, how does it fit in the words that the Torah atones for killing? 

The Shem MiShmuel (5678) cites his father that the Torah is called לקח because how much you get out of it depends on how much you put in, how much you take.  His father also said it is called לקח because it raises a person up like ולקכתם לכם by lulav where the Gemarah says one fulfills the mitzvah by merely picking it up. The S.M. says the two interpretations go hand in hand.  According to how much one puts in, one is raised up.  

With he explains how learning Torah is מכפר.  When one raises themselves, the evil forces sustaining life form the averot one has done get left behind and cut off from their life force.  With this idea he explains the Gemarah Rosh Hashana (18a) בחטא בני עלי בהא דכתיב אם יתכפר עון בית עלי בזבח ומנחה, ואמרו ז"ל בזבח ומנחה אינו מתכפר אבל מתכפר בתורה.  Why does Torah work but nothing else?  Because the decree can't be removed through means of atonement.  However, Torah works from a different angle.  One doesn't try to clean up the evil within themselves but moves above them.  This form of nullifying the decree does work.  

That is what the Sifri means.  By killing the evil forces within one's self, one obtains a כפרה. (The S.M. interprets the שפיכות דמים of the Sifri as to the sin which the Gemarah Niddah (13a) equates to שפיכות דמים.)  

יערוף כמטר לקחי תזל כטל אמרתי.  The S.M. says according to his peshat it is read as when one kills the evil forces within themselves, then one awakens the חיות within a person just as dew brings out the water inside the plant. 

These two types of atonement may be the transfer between the first half of Tishre and the second.  The first half we focus on repentance, on cleansing our sins.  Sukkot is the time we start to move on to the kapparah of Torah.  The ניסוך המים is the celebration of Torah as the mefarshim say on the possuk ושאתם מים בששון and obviously the culmination of the entire holiday is Simchat Torah.  It is a time where we focus on ולקחתם לכם, raising ourselves up above any sins. 

Tuesday, October 4, 2022

Two Types Of Yom Kippur

The Alter Rebbe notes a few distinctions in the pessukim of Emor discussing Yom Kippur vs. those of Acharei Mot.  In Emor (23:32) it says שַׁבַּ֨ת שַׁבָּת֥וֹן הוּא֙ לָכֶ֔ם וְעִנִּיתֶ֖ם אֶת־נַפְשֹֽׁתֵיכֶ֑ם בְּתִשְׁעָ֤ה לַחֹ֨דֶשׁ֙ בָּעֶ֔רֶב מֵעֶ֣רֶב עַד־עֶ֔רֶב.  Compare to Acharei (16:31) שַׁבַּ֨ת שַׁבָּת֥וֹן הִיא֙ לָכֶ֔ם וְעִנִּיתֶ֖ם אֶת־נַפְשֹֽׁתֵיכֶ֑ם חֻקַּ֖ת עוֹלָֽם.  Why the switch from היא to הוא?  Why does it say בתשעה לחדש it one and not the other?  And why does it say חקת עולם is Acharei but not in Emor?  Why does it say בתשעה לחדש, it should have said בתשיעי לחדש?  This alludes to the idea that it means one has complety vanquished the 9 traits of the נפש הבהמית.  Just as a fast weakens the body, one has used the 9 days of repentance before Yom Kippur to weaken the animal traits of the soul.  The focus of the parsha in Emor is the avodah one has done to prepare him/her self for Yom Kippur.  That is why it is says הוא, masculine, because one is an active participant in the avodah.  The parsha in Acherei is the Yom Kippur taharah that Hashem provides.  Even though there was no avodah on the traits of the soul, it is חקת עולם, even when we are not deserving, that Hashem provides taharah.  That is why it uses the feminine terminoligy, היא, for we are accepting the taharah from Hashem. 

The last Mishna in Yoma says אָמַר רַבִּי עֲקִיבָא, אַשְׁרֵיכֶם יִשְׂרָאֵל, לִפְנֵי מִי אַתֶּם מִטַּהֲרִין, וּמִי מְטַהֵר אֶתְכֶם, אֲבִיכֶם שֶׁבַּשָּׁמַיִם, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (יחזקאל לו), וְזָרַקְתִּי עֲלֵיכֶם מַיִם טְהוֹרִים וּטְהַרְתֶּם. וְאוֹמֵר (ירמיה יז), מִקְוֵה יִשְׂרָאֵל יְיָ, מַה מִּקְוֶה מְטַהֵר אֶת הַטְּמֵאִים, אַף הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא מְטַהֵר אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל.  Many seforim point out that there are two different questions addressed in the Mishna.  One is לפני מי and the other is ומי מטהר.  The question of לפני מי presupposes a person in trying to purify themselves and the question is before whom.  The question of מי מטהר אתכם is who purifies you even when you don't purify yourself.  The Mishna answers with the possuk of וזרקי עליכם, which is a sprinkling of water on a person.  That is an act of Hashem to purify the person.  Even if a person doesn't properly prepare themselves for purification, Hashem purifies the person.  The other question is answered with the possuk of מקוה ישראל ה, just as one needs to enter a mikvah, one who enters into the purification process is purified before Hashem.  (The only thing that bothers me is why the Mishna answers out of order, the second question before the first.)  Even beyond what we can do ourselves, Hashem purifies us, וזרקתי עליכם.

Monday, October 3, 2022

Close It In

The Midrash on Shir Hashirim (7:2) says בנעלים. שתי נעלים, נעילה בפסח ונעילה בסכות, אמר הקב"ה לישראל, אתם – נועלים לפני בסכות ואני נועל לפניכם בפסח  

The Sfas Emes Pesach (5637) says  כתיב מה יפו פעמיך בנעלים דרשו חז"ל על הרגלים נעילת החג ונעילת הפסח כו'. כי נעל הוא שמירת הרגל. כמו כן הקב"ה פורס סוכת שלום ברגלים הללו על בנ"י להצילם מהתערובות שנמצא בעולם השפל הזה. כמו ששומרין הרגל מטיט ושאר דברים ע"י שהוא תחתון שבאדם. [ואיתא ברמב"ם (פי"ג מה' אישות) שצריך כל איש ישראל לעשות לב"ב מנעלים חדשים בכל רגל והיא רמז לסוד הזה].  That is what we are doing in נעילה on Yom Kippur.  During Yom Kippur we are on the level of angels.  That has to be able to be locked into ourselves.  Therefore, we have an added prayer of נעילה to lock in the prayers into ourselves.  The prayer serves as a נעל to illuminate even the lowest part of our body, the feet and imbue it with kedusha that will let us rise above the tumah of the world.  After thar we are able to bring that kedusha into the world which is celebrated during Sukkot where we go out into the sukkah.  

A halachik thought on נעילה I saw in the name of Rav Soloveitchik.  He said that just as in Shemone Esrai there is a beracha of שמע קולנו that our prayers should be accepted, so to נעילה is a prayer that our prayers that our prayers should be accepted and therefore he ruled that if one had not prayed the earlier prayers in the day, one cannot pray נעילה.  This goes in line with the above thought.  נעילה functions as a prayer to fuse the loftiness of the day into the person, without that experience, נעילה would not have any energy to lock in. 

Friday, September 30, 2022

Return to Yourself; Return to Hashem

Harav Hagaon Shmuel Wolman Shlita

White seems to be a very strong theme of the Yamim Nora’im. The minhag of Klal Yisrael is to wear white during the Yamim Nora’im. Almost everyone wears a kittel on Yom Kippur; some wear one on Rosh Hashanah as well. In shul, we deck the sifrei Torah, the bimah, and the aron kodesh in white.  We know that minhag Yisrael Torah, and every minhag has deep significance. The poskim explain that we wear a kittel because we resemble the malachim, and to remind us of the day of death, but perhaps we can add another dimension to the significance of wearing white.  The Rema emphasizes that we should wear a בגד פשתן לבן ונקי.  Not only should it be white, but it should be clean.

We find the color white associated with kapparas avonos, as the passuk states: אִם יִהְיוּ חֲטָאֵיכֶם כַּשָּׁנִים כַּשֶּׁלֶג יַלְבִּינוּ. The Radak explains that “snow white” is a metaphor for the whitening of the neshamah. Similarly, on Yom Kippur, the lashon shel zehoris tied onto the entrance to the Beis HaMikdash turned white, symbolizing that Klal Yisrael had merited kapparah.  Why is the color white so closely linked with kapparas avonos?

To understand this, I think we need to go back to the basics, and appreciate what teshuvah is, and what the avodah of Aseres Yemei Teshuvah — which climaxes with Yom Kippur and Neilah — is all about.

Teshuvah, as we know, involves various elements and steps, as delineated by the Rambam and Rabbeinu Yonah. Rectifying all our chata’im and achieving kapparah is a long, arduous process, and that’s the avodah of teshuvah in the sense of the actual details of the mitzvah. But what is the essence of teshuvah?

Furthermore, what does the word teshuvah mean?We understand what the word תטהרו means: It’s a purification process, one that the Rishonim compare to the purification conferred by a mikvah. But what is the meaning of the word teshuvah, which implies “returning”? What are we returning to? Where are we returning from? The Mabit, at the beginning of Shaar Hateshuvah, asks this question.

Some understand that we’re returning to the derech hayashar, since when we do an aveirah, we veer off that path. Perhaps that is true, but the passuk, cited by the Mabit, says something else: וְשַׁבְתָּ עַד ה' אֱלֹקֶיךָ, which means we are returning to Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

How were we away from the Eibishter? The meforshim explain that when a person does aveiros, he distances himself and erects barriers between him and the Eibishter. Teshuvah involves breaking down those barriers and returning to Hakadosh Baruch Hu, going back to kirvas Elokim and to the level of dveikus that is possible only in the absence of aveiros.

In a couple of places, however, R' Yerucham writes clearly that the concept of teshuvah is lashuv el atzmo — to return to one’s inner self. What does that mean, and how does teshuvah accomplish that? Moreover, how does that idea fit with the Mabit’s explanation that teshuvah means returning to the Eibishter? Am I returning to Hashem, or to myself?

In describing the state of a baby in its mother’s womb, the Gemara in Niddah says: ונר דלוק לו על ראשו וצופה ומביט מסוף העולם ועד סופו. What is that “lit candle” above the head of the fetus, which gives it that supernatural power of gazing from one end of the world to the other? The Maharal explains that this candle is the נֵר ה' נִשְׁמַת אָדָם. Every one of us has a ner — the נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא. That neshamah is incredibly holy and illuminating, because it is taken from beneath the Kisei Hakavod. There’s a piece of the Eibishter, kivyachol, that exists in every single Yid — וַיִּפַּח בְּאַפָּיו נִשְׁמַת חַיִּים — and that is represented by the lit candle above the head of an unborn child. That ner is unbridled and limitless, enabling the baby to gaze from one end of the world to the other, because it hasn’t yet experienced the struggles and limitations of being part of this physical world. As long as the baby is inside its mother, it is a neshamah that is untarnished by the guf, which tries to drag it to places it never wanted to go. That ner dolek is our innermost self, and that chelek Eloka mimaal exists in every human being.

This, apparently, is what R’ Yerucham is referring to when he says that teshuvah means returning to ourselves. We are not attaining a new level that we never had and never experienced, but going back to our inner self. We were born with a neshamah tehorah, and we wake up every single morning with that neshamah tehorah. But then our life starts, and our day starts, and we begin dealing with all the distractions and difficulties and temptations and influences of this world. And that ner dolek, with all of its clarity, gets dimmed by this world.

When the baby is inside its mother, it learns the entire Torah, because that limitless neshamah is able to absorb kol haTorah kulah without any distractions or restrictions. When we come into this world, says the Maharal, we automatically forget all of our Torah, because this world is in direct opposition to everything about Torah and dveikus to Hashem. Our job is to get that Torah back — to constantly look to return to that inner self, to our neshamah. Teshuvah, then, is a return to both oneself and Hashem.

When we’re trying to return to the Eibishter, we’re going back to the chelek Eloka mimaal that exists within ourselves, and thereby rebuilding our relationship with the Eibishter and our ability to cleave to Him. The Gemara teaches (Yoma 86a): גדולה תשובה שמגעת עד כסא הכבוד, שנאמר (הושע יד ב) שובה ישראל עד ה' אלקיך. But it’s not the teshuvah that reaches the Kisei Hakavod; teshuvah is the vehicle that allows the person to get back to the Kisei Hakavod. How? By returning to himself, to his own neshamah, and thereby getting back his relationship with the Eibishter. This is the kirvas Elokim that teshuvah provides.

There is another recurring theme when we talk about teshuvah: לפני ה' תטהרו — we are coming “before” Hashem. Similarly, when the Rambam discusses teshuvah, he writes: והוא שישוב החוטא מחטאו לפני ה' ויתודה. How does teshuvah place a person before Hashem?

This physical world tries to distance the neshamah from its Source. The neshamah desperately wants to connect to the Eibishter, but when we are lured into believing that the world of aveiros is more enticing, and offers a better or easier way to live, we create mechitzos between us and the Eibishter, and deprive the neshamah of the connection it craves. Instead of accessing our true, intrinsic self, we are giving in to everything around us.

Teshuvah reverses that. It brings us back lifnei Hashem, back to that state where we feel the שויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד, which is harder to feel when we’re under the influence of aveiros.

When Rabbeinu Yonah discusses the avodah of Aseres Yemei Teshuvah, he talks about both teshuvah and tefillah. We know that tefillah is very important, but why is it an inextricable part of the avodah of Aseres Yemei Teshuvah, to the extent that teshuvah and tefillah seem to be synonymous?

R' Yisroel Salanter famously notes that when the Gemara in Bava Kama teaches that “maveh” means “adam,” the passuk it cites relates to davening and beseeching the Eibishter. That is the very definition of an adam: a being that is connected to the Eibishter through tefillah. Tefillah is not just something we do — it’s an expression of what we’re all about. Our neshamah craves that connection, and wants to relate to the Eibishter through tefillah.

Rashi, in Sefer Bereishis, explains that the word tefillah is related to the word psil, connoting a bond with the Eibishter. Rav Chaim says that the most basic concept of tefillah is that the person is standing before the King — that idea of lifnei Hashem.

Teshuvah and tefillah go together; they’re one and the same. Teshuvah and tefillah repair that connection, bring us back into ourselves and finding the self of ואני תפילה, the pure neshamah within ourselves that will, by definition, reach the Kisei Hakavod — וְשַׁבְתָּ עַד ה' אֱלֹקֶיךָ. This is the goal of teshuvah, and this is what we’re looking to accomplish.

Of course, we have to open up a Rambam and a Rabbeinu Yonah and discover all the various difficult steps that it takes to accomplish teshuvah. But before starting those steps, let’s understand what teshuvah is all about. It’s not about getting to new places that we never imagined. Rather, it’s simply about returning to ourselves, which means going back to our neshamah, to square one. It’s a reset of sorts. It’s not easy, but it’s not something that we never experienced.

We can now better understand the concept of “whitening” aveiros, and why white is used as a metaphor for the kapparah of teshuvah. Obviously, white conjures up the symbolism of something pure and pristine. But I think that when we talk about the color white, we mean going back to the source, back to our original state in this world, a state of pure neshamah. White implies having no additives, nothing that is trying to change or add to the neshamah. The neshamah at its baseline is represented by the color white. It’s the shoresh that lies inside every one of us.

During Aseres Yemei Teshuvah, when we’re trying to pick ourselves up and live on a higher level, let’s remember what teshuvah is all about. It’s not just tikkun hamaasim — it’s what we’re looking to eventually accomplish through all the tikkun hamaasim: to get back to the Eibishter. But the way that we get back to the Eibishter is by pressing reset, going back to white, and returning to our original state when we came into this world: נשמה שנתת בי טהורה היא.

The Eibishter should give us the siyatta d’Shmaya to utilize the Aseres Yemei Teshuvah for this dual avodah of teshuvah and tefillah, to feel the ואני תפילה, to get back to ourselves, and through that, to be zocheh to true teshuvah that reaches the Kisei Hakavod.