Showing posts with label Chanukah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chanukah. Show all posts

Thursday, December 26, 2024

Malchus Yosef vs. Yehuda

The Tosefta Berachot (4:16) asks אמרו לו [למדנו] רבינו אמר להם מפני מה זכה יהודה למלכות?  

The Midrash (90:3) says א"ר שמעון בן גמליאל יוסף משלו נתנו פִּיו שֶׁלֹא נָשַׁק בַּעֲבֵרָה, וְעַל פִּיךָ יִשַּׁק כָּל עַמִּי, גּוּפוֹ שֶׁלֹא נָגַע בַּעֲבֵרָה וַיַּלְבֵּשׁ אֹתוֹ בִּגְדֵי שֵׁשׁ, וכו

The Shiurei Daas (shmuz on Malchus) notes the difference in the terminology of the Midrashim that for Yosef it says he malchus was given משלו, it was something internal of Yosef that made him deserving but for Yehuda it says he merited malchus indicating it was thrust upon him do to his actions.  Why do Yehuda's actions allow malchus to be thrust upon him but Yosef is deserving and what is the nature of this difference if the malchus is innate or thrust upon the recipient?  

ויכלכל יוסף.  Yosef is associated with כל which is the middah of yesod, כי כל בשמים וארץ.  The middah of yesod is that one plays an active role to the degree of giving to others.  Yosef provided for the entire country.  His malchus emanates from his own self perfection.  From his own active self perfection.  That is משלו, his malchus is merely a reflection of his internal malchus, of his self control to abstain from averah.  His rulership over his own emotions, his own limbs, is what demands that he be given malchus over others.    

Yehuda is associated with the sefirah of malchus דלית ליה מגרמיה כלום, his essence is not about receiving from above.  He does stumble in sin, he is not perfect.  He doesn't receive malchut due to self perfection.  Instead, it is his acceptance of his mistake, in his acknowledgement that there is something outside of him, that allows malchut to be bestowed upon him.  

The Sfas Emes cites from the Rim that הלל corresponds to Yosef and הודאה to Yehuda.  What does this mean?  הלל is related to בהלו נרו, the tzidkus of Yosef shines forth (Sfas Emes Chanukah 5631, 5647.)  He has the middah of גואה דקדושה, to be confident in his avodah because he is successful.  Yehuda is the middah of הודאה, of acknowledging his errors.  He realizes everything he receives is a זכות to receive it from Hashem.  He on his own is underserving and is thankful for all that he obtains.      

Wednesday, December 25, 2024

The Darkness Of Monotony

The Midrash says חֹשֶׁךְ זה גלות יון שהחשיכה עיניהם של ישראל בגזירותיהן שהיתה אומרת להם כתבו על קרן השור שאין לכם חלק באלהי ישראל.  Why is the golus of יון called חושך and how does that connect with writing on the horn of the ox?  

The Bach (siman 670) says שעיקר גזירת היוונים היה ביטול העבודה, ומשום שכלל ישראל נתרשלו בעבודה,ועי"ז היה הגזירה על ביטול העבודה.  What is the nature of this attitude of התרשלות?  This happens when one's activities become a routine.  When one merely goes through the actions as rote without fire and passion.  Since the avodah was done on a daily basis for such a long period of time, the passion necessary for proper avodah was lost.  This led to יון.  Why does this lead to יון?  Because Yavan is the personification of monotony.  Aristo believed that the world was always around.  The laws of nature always existed and are unchangeable.  They are of the opinion that אין כל חדש תחת השמש, everything has a set system of laws preprogrammed that it must fit into and can not be changed.  This is noted by the Bnei Yissaschar in the very name of יון itself which shares the numerable value of the word גלגל for they believe everything fits under the rules of the galgalim,  יון, זה שמם לדראון ולחרפות, יו"ן בגימטריא גלג"ל, זה היה כל מגמתם להשכיח מישראל התורה רק להאמין שאין שום הנהגה למעלה מן הגלגלים והכל הוא בטבע הגלגלים ושפיטת הכוכבים.  (This gematria is already noted in Megalah Amukot Vaeschanan 66.) Or in other words, a גלגל is a circle that goes around, there is no way out, there is nothing beyond it.  When things are preprogramed to rules there is no excitement.  Excitement comes through chiddush.  Yavan is the anti-chiddush, anti- excitement.

Why did Yavan have a philosophy of קדמות העולם?  Why could they not accept something to be greater than the laws of nature?  Yavan's core belief is that for wisdom must be quantifiable.  Something can only be true if it can be proven and demonstrated to be the truth.  They were limited by the extent of their own ability to absorb and relate to information.  Only that which can be assessed and assessed by a human's senses and understanding was the accepted truth.  Since the world currently functions within the laws and boundaries of nature, they could not accept anything beyond that.  They were stuck in the own box that they had created.   

Daniel (Ch. 7) compares Yavan to a נמר.  As the Maharal notes, the נמר is associated with עזות as the Mishna Avos says הוי עז כנמר.  The Maharal says this is connected to chachma for לא הביישן למד, it requires an element of chutzpah to be able to question and come to the truth.  However, when one's wisom is totally derived from עזות and not tempered with the middah of ונפשי כעפר לכל תהיה, when there is a lack of מודים, a lack of acknowledgement that there may be wisdom beyond one's reach, then it can lead to one's downfall. 

Rav Nissim Gaon in his hakdamah to Shas says that nevuah stopped at the beginning of the reign of Alexander.  The navi had the capability to "see" that which is beyond the boundaries of the world.  The rise of Yavan comes about to stifle this power.  The malchus of Yavan is the antitheses to nevuah.  The ability to see the truth beyond the world's limitations was removed by Yavan.  This is the darkness that Yavan brings into the world.  When one is shrouded in utter darkness one can only feel themselves, they are not aware of anything beyond themselves.  This is the darkness which Yavan brings into the world, a lack of awareness of anything beyond the self. 

The ox represents the strength of this world.  רב תבואות בכח שור, the ox is used to plow and plant, the basis for human life in this world.  Yavan says true strength is by cultivating the powers that exist within this world.  There is nothing beyond that.   

להשכיחם תורתך.  The words חושך and שכוח share the same letters.  One forgets things that are not important to a person.  Things done as a routine are not what one remembers.  People remember that which is important, cherished and unique.  The influence of the the natural systems and order adhered to by Yavan leads to שכחה (see Shem MiShmuel Mekatz (5676).)   

The Sfas Emes interprets הרגיל בנר as one who brings light into the רגילות.  One who injects fire, passion into the actions of rote.  That is what Chanukah teaches us.  That is a lesson of the burning Chanukah candles.  The Shem MiShmuel adds that these days are auspicious to be able to inject  feelings of freshness, excitement and passion already from days yonder,  זמן כ"ה בכסלו הוא מסוגל להתחדשות והתחלת עבודה עוד מימות עולם כי במדרש שלמ"ד בתשרי נברא העולם הי' קרבן קין והבל בחנוכה, ובכ"ה בכסלו נגמר המשכן אלא שהמתין עם הקמתו עד חודש שנולד בו יצחק אבינו, ונראה כי עד נס חנוכה אף שהי' הזמן מסוגל להתחלת עבודה מטעמא דבעינן למימר קמן, מ"מ הי' כאלו אבן הי' מונח על פי הבאר, ובנס חנוכה מחמת גודל מסירת הנפש שהי' שם זכו שנגלל האבן מעל פי הבאר, והפתח פתוח וכל מי שנדבו לבו לכנוס יכנוס.

Monday, December 23, 2024

The Feminine Future

This post is an idea I suggested for my wife to say at her Neshai Chanukah event. 

In many seforim (see hakdamah to Chazon Ovadyah Chanukah) it is cited in the name of the Midrash that all the holidays will be בטל in the future except for Chanukah and Purim (in texts of Midrash we have, only Purim is mentioned, but this is a girsa many cite.)  What does it mean the holidays will be בטל if the laws of the Torah are not subject to change?  It means that the moadim will exist but their significance will fade in the great light of the Messianic era (see Teshuvot Rasha #13.)  Why is it that the holidays of Chanukah and Purim won't dim in the future as well?  

The holidays of Chanukah and Purim are unique in that they are the only holidays in which we find that woman are obligated in the mitzvot of the holiday due to the principle of אף הן היו באותו הנס and according to some opinions that means not only were they including in the same miracle but they were the catalyst for the miracle, Ester in the Purim story, and Yehudit in the Chanukah story.  

The possuk says about the days of the future (Yermiyahu 31:21) נקבה תסובב גבר, "a woman shall go after a man."  The Alter Rebbe explains that in the current state of affairs the man is the one to chase after the woman (Kiddushin 2b,) which reflects the heavenly flow from the זעיר אנפין (the masculine presence) into מלכות (the feminine presence.)  However, in the days of the future the state of מלכות will be elevated higher into the משפיע.  Hence, the woman will not play a passive role but an active role.  נקבה תסובב גבר, the woman will run after the man, she will seek to be משפיע to him, תסובב also as in סיבה ומסובב, she be be the cause for her husband's success.  There two modes are reflected in the last two of the sheva berachot.  The sixth beracha ends בָּרוּךְ אַתָּה ה', מְשַׂמֵּחַ חָתָן וְכַלָּה, the chatan is first, he is the giver and the כלה is the recipient.  The final beracha which describes the Messianic era, מְהֵרָה ה' אֱלֹהֵינוּ יִשָּׁמַע בְּעָרֵי יְהוּדָה וּבְחוּצוֹת יְרוּשָׁלָיִם וכו, ends בָּרוּךְ אַתָּה ה', מְשַׂמֵּחַ חָתָן עִם הַכַּלָּה, the word עם meaning through as in the chatan's strength will come through the woman.  

Hence, it is specifically the holidays that come about through the actions of woman that are a harbinger of the days of the future when the feminine presence will be dominant and therefore their light will only grow stronger in the days of the future. 

36

The Eliya Rabbah (672:2) says  כתב הרוקח מדליקין בחנוכה ל"ו נרות, לפי שבחנוכת עולם ויתן אותם אלהים ברקיע השמים להאיר על הארץ ואותה האור נשתמש בה אדם הראשון ל"ו שעות יום ו' י"ב שעות ולילה י"ב שעות ויום ז' י"ב שעות:  The 36 neros of Chanukah correspond to the original light which shined for 36 hours and then was hidden.  This hidden light is evoked through the lighting of the neros Chanukah.  See more about this on "שטייגן."

The Bnei Yissachar מאמרי חודש כסלו טבת מאמר א (#6) says:

 לדעתי על כן שם החודש (שהאיר בו הארה מן האור הגנוז ומכוסה בתורה) נקרא כסל"ו, כ"ס ל"ו, כיסוי ל"ו אור ונר ומאורות נתגלה ההארה בחדש הזה.  

The 36 candles and 36 hours of the original hidden light correspond as well to the 36 hours of the expansion of Shabbos (see more about it in otzar forum,) as the Bnei Yissachar delineates in Shabbas maamer 2

עוד אבוא לבאר לך עניין אחר בטעם תוספת שבת. הנה כתבתי לך אשר מרן האריז"ל כתב, אשר תוספת שבת יכולין להוסיף עד ל"א שעות, היינו מן חצות יום הששי עד שעה אחת בליל א', והיינו ל"א שעות. ועוד אמר, שלא יאמרו תחינה עד חצות ליל א', כי עד חצות לילה עדיין הוא הארת שבת. ואם כן, לפי זה הוה הארת שבת ל"ו שעות. יש לומר שהתוספת הזה כעניין כל המצוות בהידורם, כעניין שאמרו (בבא קמא ט ב), הידור מצוה עד שליש במצוה.  On Shabbas one is also able to get a slight experience of the hidden light of creation, as the Bnei Yissachar notes in Shabbas maamer 3 #7.

This may correspond to the 36 tzaddikim that are דמקבלי אפי שכינה בכל יום as the Gemarah Sukkah (45b) says. The tzaddikim are able to have a glimpse of the hidden light in their lives and hence they are מקבלי אפי שכינה בכל יום.  

The Rebbe's father, Rav Levi Yizchak also notes that כסלו can be split into כס לו and he relates לו to the gematria of the word אלה as in שאו מרום עיניכם וראו מי ברא אלה.  The word אלה represents the mask of the world, the façade that there is no G-d behind the scenes.  The name אלקים as noted by the Zohar is made up of the words אלה ים.  The name אלקים has the gematria of טבע.  It is up to a person to see the מי behind the mask of טבע, of the אלה.  The hidden light is what illuminates our vision to see that even in the טבע, in the dark days of כסלו, Hashem is really behind it all hidden from our view. 

Thursday, December 19, 2024

Internal Beauty

Zechariah (9:13)  כִּֽי־דָרַ֨כְתִּי לִ֜י יְהוּדָ֗ה קֶשֶׁת מִלֵּ֣אתִי אֶפְרַ֔יִם וְעֽוֹרַרְתִּ֚י בָנַ֙יִךְ֙ צִיּ֔וֹן עַל־בָּנַ֖יִךְ יָוָ֑ן וְשַׂמְתִּ֖יךְ כְּחֶ֥רֶב גִּבּֽוֹר.  Why are the conquerors of יון referred to as the people of ציון specifically?  The Alshich says since the battle of Chanukah was waged by the Chasmoniam who were the bearers of the Torah which is associated with ציון as in כי מציון תצא תורה.  And it is the Torah which the possuk concludes is the great sword which will be used to smite Javan.  

However, even though the Alshich notes the beginning of the possuk notes Yehuda and Efraim and then continues to the בני ציון indicating a third group, there are seforim that point out a connection between ציון and יוסף.  The word ציון itself can be broken into צ יון in which the צ stands for צדיק, Yosef is called tzaddik.  Closer to the point, the gematria of יוסף and ציון is exactly the same, 156, see much ado about this in Kol Hator.  Why is the power of Yosef used to defeat יון and what is its connection to ציון?  

Yosef is the only man in Chumash described as יפה תואר ויפה מראה.  Rashi tells us in Vayetzeh when the same expression appears in the Torah's description of Rachel, that תאר is צורת הפרצוף and מראה is זיו קלסתר.  In other words, תאר refers to the actually form of the face, how everything comes together to create a beautiful image and מראה refers to the internal shine that radiates of the face.  חכמת אדם תאיר פניו, the face expresses the internal wisdom that exists within the individual.  The תאר is an external beauty but it is even deeper when accompanied by מראה, a reflection of an internal purity. Why is it significant to know that Yosef was handsome and why is he the only man in Chumash given this description?  צִיּוֹן כְּלִילַת יֳפִי or as the possuk (Tehillim 50:2) says מציון מכלל יפי.  Zion is also called יופי, why? 

In its purest form יופי is an expression of the heavenly dimension meeting earth.  Zion is the meeting place of heaven and earth.  Yosef is the midah of yesod, כל כל בשמים ובארץ, the midah which combines heaven and earth.  The beauty is a reflection of the gashmi being used for the proper designated, ruchni purpose.  When the gashmi is inline with the ruchni purpose it was created for the internal purity shines though.  The יופי is not a maaleh on its own accord but is a mirror of the internal beauty of something being used for its designated purpose.     

The Greeks were known for their appreciation of aesthetics.  The beauty of Yefes is meant to adorn the אהלי שם.  It is a means to accentuate the spiritual usage of Shem.  However, they appreciated beauty but not as a means to an end but rather as an end in of itself.  The root of such a mistake shares the same roots as the origins of the sin of idolatry.  They also started with noble intensions to serve Hashem through His messengers but in the end they worshipped the means, they viewed that as an end in its own right an missed the bridge to the connect back to Hashem.  They got stuck in יפה תואר but it was not יפה מראה, there was no reflection of an inner, genuine truth shining through.  (This part is based upon shiurim from Rav Moshe Shhapira.)     

Rav Kook writes (see as an example his letters volume 4) that Zion refers to Yerushalayim as the capital of the nation of Klal Yisrael.  It is the term used to describe the seat of the malchus of Yisrael, of the mundane power of government.  Yerushalayim refers to the place of kedusha, the place of the Mikdash, the place that parallels the spiritual realm above.  That is why, as Rav Kook explains in the letter, he wished to move away from Mizrachi, and Zionism to form דגל ירושלים, a movement devoted to bring kedusha to the settling of Zion.  

This is why Zion is called יופי.  Its יופי is a mirror of the usage of the mundane force of the government body to facilitate the kedusha of Yerushalayim to to shine.  This midah is embodied by Yosef.  It is precisely because Yosef had the capability to live in the depths of Egypt, the טומאת הארץ, that he did not get lost in the externalities of beauty, that he is described as being handsome. 

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

3,4 and 19 Kislev

The Gra (Aderes Eliyahu) in the beginning of Ha'azinu has many dikdukim in the possuk, האזינו השמים ואדברה ותשמע הארץ אמרי פי.  One of the points he raises it why the heavens is only afforded three words, האזינו השמים ואדברה while the earth gets four, ותשמע הארץ אמרי פי?  He explains that שמים refers to the Torah שבכתב and the ארץ refers to Torah שבעל פה.  He says the 4 and the 3 parallel the two types of שין on the tefillin of the head, the right side has a four pronged שין and the left side has a three pronged.  These also correspond to the three ברכת השחר in the morning and 4 in the evening.  How do these ideas all come together, what does the written Torah have to do with the number 4 and the oral Torah with the number 3?   

The Gemarah Shabbas (104a) says ג,ד stands for גומל דלים.  In the terminology of Chassidus ג refers to the middah of yesod which is the giver and the letter ד refers to malchut, the recipient.  The written Torah is the giver, it is given to Klal Yisrael from Hashem.  That is why it matches up with the number 3, the giver.  The oral Torah is the Torah composed by the recipients, Klal Yisrael.  The 4 pronged שין is on the right side of the tefillin, the side of chesed, the masculine side, the giver.  The 3 pronged שין in on the left side, that of gevurot, the feminine side, the recipient.  That is why there are 3 avos, three givers and 4 imahot, 4 receivers.  The morning is the time of chesed as well, there is a possibility of a bright new day.  The evening is the time of gevurot, of the time of taking in the events of the day.  That is the matchup of 3 to the written Torah, שמים and 4 to the oral Torah, ארץ.   

The name of the Alter Rebbe is שניאור which according to the Maharshal refers to שני אור, two forms of light.  The avodah of chassidus is to  take the ארץ and align it with שמים.  When the recipient is willing to acknowledge the giver that is the ultimate tikkun.  This is is hinted to by the fact that the original 19-20 Kislev liberation happened on a Tuesday- Wednesday, יום ג ויום ד.  The day is to celebrate the spreading forth of the recognition of the  complete presence of the שמים, the נותן in the ארץ. 

The Bas Ayin notes the the fact that Kislev is three months after Tishray and parallels this to the story of Yehuda and Tamar.  Rav Levi Yitzchak notes that there are two forms of three which correspond with two forms of giving the Torah.  The Torah was given in Sivan, the third month from the count from Nissan.  The Gemarah Shabbas (88a and Rav Nissan Gaon ad loc.) note many forms of three that were present at the giving of the Torah.  Moshe was the third child from the third shevet, Levi.  This is present at the giving of the written Torah from Hashem, the אתערותא דלעילא which happens in the third month from the method of counting from Nissan, the month of the greatest אתערותא דלעילא.  Chanukah is the holiday which is the precursor to the oral Torah and hence it happens in the third month counting from Tishray.  In other words, the count from אתערותא דלתתא, from man's own actions.  That is why Chanukah happened only through mesiras nefesh, it had to happen through the actions of man.  And the miracle happened through the חשמונאים, the descendants of Levi, the third tribe.  It is the oral Torah that leads us through the golus.  It is what distinguishes us from the gentiles.  While they may have the Septuagint, access to the written Torah, they do not have access to the oral Torah.  This is the three that leads to four, when the recipients, Klal Yisrael play an active role, and it is that fusion that guides us through the centuries. 

Sunday, December 17, 2023

Middah Of Malchus

How did Pharaoh know the interpretations of the dreams he had given by everyone else was wrong but Yosef was right?  The Or Hachaim asks the word פרעה in the possuk  ואין פותר אותם לפרעה seem extra, we are talking about the dreams of Pharaoh, of course they were interpreting the dreams to him?  The Or Hachaim explains the word Pharaoh is not the name of the King but is a reference to the kingship of the Egyptians.  He explains that a king has dreams that are about the entirety of the kingdom, not personal dreams.  The interpreters said the dreams were about Pharaoh himself but Pharaoh understood his dreams, the dreams of a king, are about what effects the entirety of the nation.  Why does a king dream about the nation?   

Why was Yehuda specifically set to set up the Jewish settlement in Goshen?  Rav Chayim Shmulevitz explains that a king has to take responsibility for the nation.  Yehuda took achrayut for Binyamin, he guaranteed his safety and that is the main attribute of a king.  He explains with this the idea the Gemarah Yoma (22b) that Shaul lost the kingship because of one sin and Dovid did two sins and was forgiven.  What was the difference?  Shaul's sin was that he could not stand up to the demands of the people that wanted to spare the property of Amalek an Agag.  He did not stay the buck stops here, I need to ensure the commandment of Hashem is fulfilled.  That is a lack in the necessary middah for malchus and it was stripped from him.  Dovid sinned but those were sins that didn't contradict the middah of a melech and that could be forgiven.  

The Alter from Kelm (second maamer) asks why is it that Dovid, Shlomo, Yosef wanted malchus, were they people that wanted honor and recognition?  He explains that the melech has the ability to have a greater effect on the world.  The king has the power to fix people's problems.  This, he says, is the greatest demonstration of נושא בעול אם חבירו.  It was to fulfill this middah that the greatest of people desired kingship.  Not for greatness but to be great for others.  

The Rambam (Chanukah 3:1) says  וְגָבְרוּ בְּנֵי חַשְׁמוֹנַאי הַכֹּהֲנִים הַגְּדוֹלִים וַהֲרָגוּם וְהוֹשִׁיעוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל מִיָּדָם וְהֶעֱמִידוּ מֶלֶךְ מִן הַכֹּהֲנִים וְחָזְרָה מַלְכוּת לְיִשְׂרָאֵל יֶתֶר עַל מָאתַיִם שָׁנָה עַד הַחֻרְבָּן הַשֵּׁנִי.  It appears from the Rambam that the rulership of the Bais Chashmonei was a continuation of the story of the nes Chanukah.  What is the connection between their malchus and their repelling of the Greek decrees?  Rav Yeruchem Olshin explains with this idea of the Alter.  Since the Chashmoneim stood up for Klal Yisrael , were moser nefesh, they demonstrated the greatest act of נושא בעול and that is what gave the Chasmoneim the ability to be kings.  This is why a a melech must feel the sense of responsibility for others for the whole yesod of malchus it to affect a positive change in the lives of others.  

What is it about being a king that must contain this middah, is it just due to proper circumstances because they are in control?  It is not just circumstance that a king has a big heart that goes out for others but it is part of the essence of his job.  The Sfas Emes Vayigash (5648) says ומדת יהודה מלכות בית דוד דלית לי' מגרמי' כלום. וכל כחו הוא מה שהוא כלי לקבל ומוכן תמיד בהכנעתו אל האדון ית"ש.  The middah of melucha is the king has on self identity, he is battal to where the ultimate king, Hashem.  The king realizes that his power is a mere reflection of this and hence feels only for others not for himself.  The Sfas Emes continues ,this is indicated in the names of Yehuda and Dovid themselves, ומדה זו הוא בחי' יהודה ודוד כמ"ש מו"ז ז"ל יהודה ה' כלול בו. ואות דל"ת שהוא מלא הכנעה בהיותו יודע שהשם בו. וכן אותיות דוד. הד' שפלות. וזכה אח"כ להמשכת הקדושה שע"ז רומז אות ו'. ומ"מ נשאר אח"כ ד' כמקודם.  Despite all the gedulah, they recognize that it is not due to their own merits and have a sense of complete nullification to put everyone before themselves.  

Says Rav Chayim Shmulevitz, that is what Pharoh saw is Yosef to make him second in command.  Just because he can interpret a dream does not make him worthy of being the prime minister, so why did he get the job?  Because he said אלקים יענה את שלום פרעה.  He did not take credit for himself but recognized that he was a mere reflection of a higher power.  That is the middah of malchus and when Pharoah heard that he knew this was his man.

Saturday, December 16, 2023

Bitachon Wins Wars

The Pri Migadim (602) says the words in al hanissin on Chanukah ואתה ברחמיך הרבים עמדת להם בעת צרתם refer to the fact that Hashem redeemed Klal Yisrael even though they did not pray.  It would seem to the P.M. the words הרבים indicate a yeshua not prayed for.  However, the Magen Avraham (285) says in the name of the Tashbatz Katan that the Chasmonaim said what we say on motzei Shabbat, ויהי נועם ויושב בסתר (which if you add the 112 words of יושב בסתר, 12 words *2 of ויהי נועם and אורך ימים 5 words *2 = 130 gematria of הכהנים.)  So that woul eem to indicate they did pray?  In the sefer Bney Binah he suggests that this is was not words aid as prayer but are pessukim of bitachon.  The Chasmonaim were solidifying their bitachon in Hashem and that was the merit to win the war.  We find this concept by krias yam suf were Bnei Yisrael are told not to daven but to just trust in hashem.  That is the guarantee of success even when tefillah will not be accepted.  Bitachon works to break all barriers.

Friday, December 15, 2023

Torah As Implanted Nature

In the al Hanissim for Chanukah we say להשכיחם תורתך.  What does this mean that the Greeks tried to make us forget learning and how?  In the hakdama of the sefer Yam Hatalmud it says that the pach shemen that Yaakov left behind is the pach of oil the Chasmonaim found.  We see there is a connection between Yaakov and fighting against Yavan, what is this connection?    

In the beginning of the hafladik words of the Bah in siman 47 where he discusses the issue of שלא ברכו בתורה תחילה he says ונראה דכונתו ית' מעולם היתה שנהיה עוסקים בתורה כדי שתתעצם נשמתינו בעצמות ורוחניות וקדושת מקור מוצא התורה ולכן נתן הקב"ה תורת אמת לישראל במתנה שלא תשתכח מאתנו כדי שתתדבק נשמתינו וגופינו רמ"ח איברים ושס"ה גידין ברמ"ח מ"ע ושס"ה לא תעשה שבתורה.  What does the Bach mean since the Torah is a present it will not be forgotten?  Rav Wolbe (volume 2 pg. 93) where he goes through explaining the words of the Bach cites Rav Yeruchem (Daas Chachma U'Mussar volume 1 pg. 9-11) who explains the idea of nature is the inborn natural traits that Hashem planted within an individual.  He extends this further and adds that those that merit to receive from Hashem that which is beyond normal capacity it becomes nature for that person.  Something that is beyond nature becomes nature for that person.  He says when Chazal say (Nedarim 38a) that Moshe kept on forgetting the Torah until Hashem gave it to him as a mattanah it means that the Torah is beyond human grasp but Hashem gave it to Moshe to become part of his nature.  Mankind is now able to be influenced through the Torah.  If the Torah becomes the nature of a person it will not be forgotten just as one doesn't forget their natural character traits for it is part of the makeup of the person.  Forgetting creeps in only when one doesn't feel the Torah is part of the person.  Forgetting means its not part of my teva, it is not part of my general gestalt.  The Greeks wanted the Torah to be studied just as any other chachma.  The mathematics, chemistry, physics, philosophy don't become part of the person.  They are just studies one may learn and forget, learn and forget.  The Greeks said study Torah the same way but don't make it part of you.  It isn't part of your natural programming.  

The Midrash (Vayetzei 69) says  וְהִנֵּה ה' נִצָּב עָלָיו וַיֹּאמַר אֲנִי ה' וגו' (בראשית כח, יג), רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר זִמְרָא פָּתַח (תהלים סג, ב): כָּמַהּ לְךָ בְּשָׂרִי בְּאֶרֶץ צִיָּה וְעָיֵף בְּלִי מָיִם, רַבִּי  רַבָּנָן אָמְרֵי כְּשֵׁם שֶׁנַּפְשִׁי צָמְאָה לְךָ כֵּן רמ"ח אֵבָרִים שֶׁיֵּשׁ בִּי צְמֵאִים לְךָ, the flesh and bones of Yaakov thirsted for Hashem.  They were connected to Hashem.  Yaakov is the complete antithesis to Yavan.  He lived as if the Torah was part of his very essence.  That is why Yaakov is the antidote against Yavan (based upon a shmuzz of R' Elefant.)

Monday, December 11, 2023

A New Form Of Malchus

Why is the Chanukas Habais in the middle of the second Beis Hamikdash celebrated but there is no celebration for the chanukah of the first Mikdash?  

חנוכה may be read as חנוך ה, the chinuch of ה.  What does this mean?  The letter ה as detailed by the Alter Rebbe appears twice in the name of Hashem.  The first one alludes to the emanation of בינה and the second one refers to the emanation of מלכות.  (The two are interconnected as both are an expansion of the preceding sefirot.)  In Patach Eliyahuit says מלכות תורה שבעל פה קרינן לה.  Malchus is connected to תורה שבעל פה (dibbur is a way of communicating with others akin to malchus which serves to distribute the light of the sefirot.)    

Yosef tells the people of Egypt  הא לכם זרע which the Arizal teaches hints to the fact that Yosef was trying to introduce kedusha into Egypt.  He was trying to manifest the ה, the malchus of Hashem to be present in Egypt.  This maybe hinted to when Yosef tells Pharoh (in this week's parsha,) וחמש את ארץ מצרים, the חמש, the letter ה, by recognizing Hashem , it will be the antidote to the years of famine (as seeen from the act that when Yaakov was in Egypt the famine stopped.)    

The Beis Sheni was missing 5 things (Yoma 21b.)  Why specifically 5 things?  It alludes to the fact that the malchus of Hashem was incomplete during the time of the second Mikdash.  The Mikdash was built and continued under the authority of a foreign ruler.  It did not represent a entirely distinct, free nation under its own autonomy.  What was to ensure that the malchus of Hashem would continue in the Diaspora?  The תורה שבעל פה.  The malchus of Hashem, ever-present in the first Mikdash would not continue and would transform into the pilpul of Torah until it can be revealed in an open form again.  It is this form of a new dimension of the malchus of Hashem which is the chinuch of Klal Yisrael for the future Mikdash.  We celebrate the chanukah of the second Mikdash during Chanukah because it was at this time that the miracle of the light of the menorah was a beacon of light to signal this new approach of תורה שבעל פה being used to keep us going until the third Mikdash will be built.  It is a holiday of chinuch, of teaching, of internalizing what will ensure the continuum of Klal Yisrael to be ready for the third Mikdash, may it be rebuilt soon.

Thursday, December 7, 2023

Oil And The Soul

The Bas Ayin says the story of the informant about Tamar and her request of Yehuda to vindicate herself is a hint to the Chanukah story.  3 Months after Tishray is Kislev.   The informant, the satan complains that Klal Yisrael should not have had a good verdict for they have strayed.  Tamar, representing Klal Yisrael presents the חותמת, the seal of the jar of oil, the פתילים, the wicks and the מטה (gematria of כלי,) the container for the oil as proof that she is righteous and proclaims לאיש אשר אלה לו אנכי הרה, the 36 candles (gematria of אלה) is the one I am attached too.  

The holiday of Chanukah is illuminated by oil.  Oil has a dichotomy in that it does not mix with other liquids yet permeates through everything.  Chanukah is the celebration of the mesiras nefesh displayed by Matisyahu and family to to stand up to the Greeks.  The power of mesiras nefesh stems the yechida of the Jew.  The yechida is the highest level of the neshama, the essence of the Jew which which remains attached to Hashem.  When one is faced with a test of mesiras nefesh it awakens the innermost essence of a Jew which wishes to remain attached to Hashem.  The yechida of the Jew is awakened and takes action.  Mesiras nefesh stems from the yechida of the nefesh and when it is ignited, it permeates all the activities of the individual.  This is why Chanukah is symbolized by oil.  The oil symbolizes the yechida which stands distant form the forefront of the individual but effects everything.  

Monday, December 26, 2022

Training For The Future

In the הנרות הללו we say ואין לנו רשות להשתמש בהן אלא לראותן בלבד.  Why is this halacha something we need to stress right after lighting the candles?  Why does the Rambam stress that the Chanukah story happened during the Bait Sheni?  

The Kad Hakemach says  ועוד יש בזה טעם אחר והוא כי חשבון ח' רמז לשמן המשיח שהוא על מעלת שמנה, וידוע כי חשבון שמנה הוא אחר הז' במעלת האחד ובזמן המשיח יחזרו כל האומות לאמונתנו הוא שכתוב (צפניה ג׳:ט׳) כי אז אהפוך אל עמים שפה ברורה לקרוא כלם בשם ה' ולעבדו שכם אחד. וכתיב (זכריה י״ד:ט׳) ביום ההוא יהיה ה' אחד ושמו אחד. ולפי שהעולם הזה הוא על מעלת שבעה ומזה היתה מנורת המשכן והמקדש בז' נרות, חייבה החכמה להיות זמן המשיח על מעלת ח' כי בו תהיה מעלה יתירה ותוספת השגה בידיעת הש"י על כל הזמנים שעברו הוא שכתוב (ירמיהו ל״א:ל״ד) כי כלם ידעו אותי למקטנם ועד גדולם. והנה רז"ל הרחיבו הביאור בענין הזה הוא שאמר במס' ערכין (פ"ב דף יג ב) רבי יהודה אומר כנור של מקדש של ז' נימין היה שנא' (תהילים ט״ז:י״א) שובע שמחות את פניך. אל תקרי שובע אלא שבע. ושל ימות המשיח שמנה שנא' למנצח על השמינית על נימא שמינית ושל העוה"ב עשר שנא' (שם לג) בנבל עשור זמרו לו. הענין הזה יש להתבונן בשמנת הימים האלה הנקראים חנוכה שהוא נגזר מלשון חנוך בלשון חנוכת הבית לפי שהוא רומז לשמן המשיח שאנו עתידין לחנך בית המקדש.  He says that Chanukah trains us for the times of Mashiach.  These words are echoed by the Sfas Emes (5646) וחנוכה הוא חינוך ורמז לאלה היו"ט שלעתיד.  What in Chanukah is a preparation for the future? 

ויעש כן אהרן פרש"י להגיד שבחו שלא שינה.  Many asks what is the הו"א that Aharon wouldn't follow instructions?  The Chanukat Hatorah says based upon the Midrash that it doesn't say ןיהי כן about the creation of light because the good light is hidden away for the tzaddikim.  Says the C.H. that the Kabbalists teach that the Aharon drew down that light in the Mikdash through his lighting.  That is what it means, ויעש כן אהרן שלא שינה, Aharon put back the ויהי כן into the lights so that it would not be different from every other creation.  The lighting of the menorah was a small restoration of the original light of creation.  The Ramban says the hadlakat nerot in Behaloscha are continued in the nerot of Chanukah.  The lighting of the menorah illuminates the dark golut with the bright light of creation. 

The Beit Sheni, writes the Yeshuot Yaakov (siman 549) in the name of early sources, was a pitstop in the golut to have a short period of tranquility to be able to establish the Mishna and Gemarah to guide us through the golut.  the Chanukah miracle establishes that the light of the menoah, of the תורה שבעל פה will stay with us and guide until Mashiach as the Shla (Titzavah) notes the menorah is עדות שהשכינה שורה בתוך כלל ישראל and that continues with the Chanukah menorah to demonstrate that the Shechina is guiding us through the golut.   

This is the emphasis that the miracle occurred during the Beit Sheni era.  The miracle is part of a process toward the future.  We say that we can't benefit from the candles because we acknowledge that we have not yet experienced the full fruition of the Chanukah miracle.  In our current state we can only gaze into the light and get a glimpse into the future.  

Monday, December 19, 2022

Chanukah & Chalek

This post is notes meant to accompany this source sheet. 

 וְחשֶׁךְ, זֶה גָּלוּת יָוָן, שֶׁהֶחֱשִׁיכָה עֵינֵיהֶם שֶׁל יִשְׂרָאֵל בִּגְזֵרוֹתֵיהֶן, שֶׁהָיְתָה אוֹמֶרֶת לָהֶם, כִּתְבוּ עַל קֶרֶן הַשּׁוֹר שֶׁאֵין לָכֶם חֵלֶק בֵּאלֹקֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל.  Why did they say you have no חלק?  Why did they say write it on an ox horn?  And what does this have to do with darkness?  

כי חלק ה עמו יעקב חבל נחלתו means that Klal Yisrael is under a special Hashgacha of Hashem.  The Greeks wanted to deny that special connection.  They said you are not 'חלק ה, you don't have a special connection.  Any possibility of that was lost during the sin of agel where Klal Yisrael demonstrated the desire for an intermediatory.  However, that is not the case.  Klal Yisrael is in essence always connected to Hashem.  

Just as the moon reflects the sun's rays, light is a metaphor for the connection of Klal Yisrael to Hashem.  When it is strong there is light.  When it is diminished through sin it becomes dark.  That is the darkness of יון, to attempt to put a wedge between the innate connection Klal Yisrael has with Hashem.   

Thursday, December 15, 2022

Of Admitting And Thanking

Harav Hagaon Binyamin Cohen Shlita

In this week’s parashah, Yehudah publicly admits that Tamar was innocent, and as a result, the beis din did not have Tamar executed. This courageous admission of Yehudah’s is what prompted Reuven to make a public admission as well, Chazal say (Makkos 11b). The Midrash teaches that Yehudah’s gevurah in making this admission came from his mother, Leah, who declared when he was born, הַפַּעַם אוֹדֶה אֶת ה'. Yehudah was her fourth child, which was more than she expected to have, and Rashi explains that she gave thanks to Hashem because she felt she had received more than her share. Because she gave thanks, says the Midrash, she merited to have children who were also baalei hoda’ah: Yehudah, who said צָדְקָה מִמֶּנִּי, and Dovid Hamelech, who said הוֹדוּ לַה' כִּי טוֹב.

The connection between Leah’s hoda’ah and that of her descendant, Dovid Hamelech, is obvious. But what connection is there between Leah’s giving thanks to Hashem and Yehudah’s admission of what he had done? How can both Dovid and Yehudah be termed baalei hoda’ah?

Rav Hutner explains that the word hoda’ah has two meanings. It means giving thanks, as in the phrase modeh ani, and it also means admitting, as in the phrases hoda’as baal din, modeh b’miktzas, modeh b’knas. Rav Hutner explains that there’s a connection between giving thanks and admitting. In order to thank someone, you have to admit that you received or benefited from them. Since Leah “admitted” the good Hashem had given her, by giving thanks, she merited to have a son who possessed this middah of hoda’ah and was able to make a difficult admission.

Rav Nosson Wachtfogel expresses a similar idea, using slightly different wording. He explains that when someone gives hoda’ah, he becomes “shuldig” — obligated or indebted to another person. When you thank someone, you are indebted to them, and when you admit that you wronged someone else, you become obligated to them as well.

Now, we find that after Leah gave hoda’ah, she stopped having children, as the passuk says, וַתַּעֲמֹד מִלֶּדֶת. ThTur al haTorah says that because she thanked Hakadosh Baruch Hu for the past but she didn’t daven for the future, to have more children, she stopped having children for a while. It sounds like she was punished — but why? It seems polite not to ask for more! Why would that make her deserving of punishment?

Rav Avraham Erlanger zt”l explains that when we give hoda’ah to Hakadosh Baruch Hu, we are admitting that everything comes from Him, that we need Him, and that on our own we would have nothing. We are utterly dependent on His goodness. Once a person achieves that recognition fully, he automatically turns to Hashem and davens: “I need more, I’m dependent, I can’t go further without You, Hashem.” If a person does not take this next step of davening, then the hoda’ah is incomplete.

This idea can explain why, in Hallel — which is composed of pirkei Tehillim that give thanks to Hakadosh Baruch Hu — we make requests like אָנָּא ה' הוֹשִׁיעָה נָּא אָנָּא ה' הַצְלִיחָה נָּא. How do these requests fit into Hallel? The answer is that in Hallel, we thank Hakadosh Baruch Hu and admit that everything comes from Him. Once we recognize that He is the kol yachol and we are utter dependent on Him, then automatically, we are spurred to ask Him to save us and give us hatzlachah.

Every Yom Tov, we know, has its own purpose and goal. Pesach is Zman Cheiruseinu, Shavuos is Zman Mattan Toraseinu, Succos is Zman Simchaseinu, and Chanukah is a time l’hodos u’lehallel. True, we say “Modim” three times a day all year long, but on Chanukah the mitzvas hayom is specifically to give praise and thanks. It’s a time for us to contemplate, acknowledge, and admit to all the good that Hakadosh Baruch Hu does for us personally and for all of Klal Yisrael.

In Al Hanissim, we begin with “Bimei Mattisyahu Kohen Gadol,” but, as Rav Nosson Wachtfogel points out, we don’t follow with any mention of how Mattisyahu and his sons led the battle and won the war. All we say is that when the evil Greek Empire sought to obliterate Torah, Hashem fought on our behalf: רבת את ריבם, דנת את דינם, נקמת את נקמתם. We don’t talk about any people leading or winning the war, because we realize it was all from Hakadosh Baruch Hu. That’s the hallel v’hoda’ah that we give: the realization that everything comes from Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

Perhaps this also explains why, in Al Hanissim, we discuss only the war, and we don’t even mention the nes of the pach shemen. The nes of the pach shemen was obviously Hakadosh Baruch Hu’s doing. But we need to stress that the military victory, which could be mistakenly attributed to kochi v’otzem yadi, was also entirely from Hashem. That’s the hoda’ah, the admission and thanks that we’re giving.

A Yid, we know, is called a “Yehudi,” which comes from the root hoda’ah — thanking Hakadosh Baruch Hu. Interpreting the passuk יְהוּדָה אַתָּה יוֹדוּךָ אַחֶיךָ, in Parashas Vayechi, the Targum Yonasan ben Uziel writes: יְהוּדָה אַנְתְּ אוֹדֵיתָא עַל עוּבְדָא דְתָמָר בְּגִין כֵּן לָךְ יְהוֹדוּן אֲחָךְ וְיִתְקְרוּן יְהוּדָאִין עַל שְׁמָךְ — because you, Yehudah, admitted to your actions in the incident with Tamar, your brothers will acknowledge you as a melech, and Jews will be named after you.

The title “Yehudi,” then, is a reflection of Yehudah’s admission of wrongdoing. We learn from this that the underlying root of giving hoda’ah, thanks, to Hashem is admitting to the good He has done for us.

A Yid recognizes the massive gift that Hakadosh Baruch Hu has given us by separating us from all other nations and choosing us as the am hanivchar. The more we acknowledge our uniqueness, and Hashem’s great kindness in choosing us as His people, the more we’ll be filled with hallel v’hoda’ah to Him. And the more we acknowledge the goodness we receive from Him, the more complete our hoda’ah to Him will be, and that will cause us to experience true inner joy.

Saturday, December 4, 2021

Captured Light

The Gemorah in Megillah (6a) says אָמַר רַבִּי אֲבָהוּ וְעֶקְרוֹן תֵּעָקֵר זוֹ קֵסָרִי בַּת אֱדוֹם שֶׁהִיא יוֹשֶׁבֶת בֵּין הַחוֹלוֹת וְהִיא הָיְתָה יָתֵד תְּקוּעָה לְיִשְׂרָאֵל בִּימֵי יְווֹנִים וּכְשֶׁגָּבְרָה מַלְכוּת בֵּית חַשְׁמוֹנַאי וְנִצְּחוּם הָיוּ קוֹרִין אוֹתָהּ אַחִידַת מִגְדַּל שִׁיר.  Why did they choose the name מגדל שיר?  What is the significance that בית חשמונאי captured it?  The Maharasha points out that the people that lived בין החולות were the תרמודאיים as the Gemorah in Shabbat (31a) says.  The Gemorah there says that there eyes are narrow because they live in sandy places so that the sand won't enter their eyes (see Rashi there.)  The Gemorah says one must light the Chanukah candles until the תרמודאי come in (Shabbat 21b.)  The תרמודאי represent the power of the Greeks.  The narrow eyes are the eyes narrowed because of the חשך זו יון.  They narrow one's vision to only see the mundane and not see kedusha.  They live בין החולות , between chulin, chol.  They promote an existence of the mundane as the only thing that there is to exist for.  These people occupied קֵסָרִי בַּת אֱדוֹם.  It was the power of the חשמונאים that was able to illuminate even their dark existence.  They renamed it מגדל שיר for the dreidel is like a migdal, it is a mini tower that has the letters נגהש, the gematria of משיח, it reminds us of the אור of moshiach which we are able to tap into for a few days to illuminate the dark days of the golus to lead us to the ultimate שיר, the שיר חדש (based upon a drasha by R' Feuer.) 

Thursday, December 2, 2021

The Jewish Genes

Why did the Greeks specifically make decrees against milah, shabbos and Rosh Chodesh? The Gemorah asks how can we make a beracha on lighting Chanukah candles if it is only a rabbinic enactment.  There were earlier enactments, so why is the Gemorah only bothered about Chanukah candles?  באו בניך לדביר ביתך, why use the title of בנים here?  Why did the Greeks make a ruling for the Jews to write that אין לכם חלק באלוקי ישראל

The Bnei Yissochar (maamer 4 #88) cites from the Chidah that in the three mitzvot of milah, Shabbos and Chodesh is demonstrated the special, unique relationship that Hashem has with Klal Yisroel that they are called בנים.  Shabbos is given only to Klal Yisroel because Shabbos is declared kodesh by Hashem, designated for Hashem and only those that are בנים can use the property of the the king.  The Zohar says those that keep milah are called בנים and Chosesh is where even Hashem follows the decleration of the Beis Din because Klal Yisroel is called בנים.  The Greeks wanted to uproot this unique connection Klal Yisroel has to Hashem.  

What is the root of this special connection?  It is part of the makeup of Klal Yisroel.  The Jewish geans, inherited from the Avos make Klal Yisroel special irrespective of one's standing.  The Greeks understood that the study of wisdom could make a person greater but they could not fathom how Klal Yisroel is special innately because of their relationship to the Avos.  That is the intent of writing  אין לכם חלק באלוקי ישראל.  The Greeks wanted to say you are not connected automatically to the chosen nation.  That is why the Gemorah asks about the beracha on ner Chanukah specifically.  The Gemorah wants to know what is the source of the power of the Chachamim to add a mitzvah.  The Gemorah is not just asking a halachik question but wants to know where does the ability come for.  The Gemorah answers שאל אביך ויגד לך, the power comes from the innate Jewish genes passed down through the generations (from Pachad Yitkchak maamer 4 and Yerach L'moadim siman 24.)  

Sunday, November 28, 2021

Extra Hiddur

From Igros Kodesh of the Rebbe volume 1 #125 part one of the letter. 

 הגלוי' שלו בעתה קבלתי, אבל רק עתה השגתי - אחרי חפוש ודרישה את הספר ברכת אברהם - לר' אברהם אביש - אשר מזכיר במכתבו, ולכן נתעכב מכתבי ע"ע ואתו הסליחה.וכפי בקשתו הנני להעתיק בזה דברי נכד המחבר בספר הנ"ל, במענה השאלה:

מה נשתנה מצות נ"ח שמצינו בה מהדרין ומהדרין מן המהדרין משא"כ בשאר מצות.

וז"ל בהנוגע לנדו"ז (המוקף בחצע"ג הוא משלי):

ראוי לבאר למה במצוה זו (דנ"ח) נשתנה למהדרין ולמהדרין מהמ"ד כו' ועוד דהא אם יש לאחד כמה ב"ב שבזה יש חסרון כיס למהדרין ביותר שהוא צריך להדליק נר לכל אחד ואחד והממה"מ הוא מדליק עבור כולם.- (כשיטת התוס' - שבת כא, ב - ומנהג ספרד. וצע"ק למה תפס היפך מנהג הפשוט של מדינות אלו כיון שהי' אב"ד סעראצק, ואולי ס"ל דאינו אלא מנהג בעלמא - וע"ד מה שפי' בלח"מ (רמב"ם הל' חנוכה פ"ד ה"ג) מנהג ספרד - ולא משום דס"ל כשיטת הרמב"ם בפי' סוגיא דשבת. ואולי הכריחו לומר כן כיון שבכ"מ אשכנזים ס"ל כתו' נגד הרמב"ם, וכמו שהעידו ע"ז בנ"כ השו"ע או"ח סתרע"א, אבל משטחיות הל' ברמ"א שם לא משמע כן) -

ונראה לפרש כו' שהגזרה הי' על שבת כו' ובודאי הי' גם בישראל כמה מדרי' וקצתם לא קנאו רק לשמו ית' ויתעלה... וקצתם שהי' בהם גם לכבוד בעוה"ז, וכפי חמימות לב כאו"א כן הי' נצחונם... וע"כ אף בהתגלות הנס לכח נחלק לפי פועל אדם למענהו שכת הטהורים שמסגלים מצות כמה מהדליקים כמה נרות (כנראה כונתו לדין ממה"מ) ובאמת המצוה יותר מהודרת כשעומדים בשורה אחת (צע"ק כוונתו) אבל כת הצדיקים אין משגיחין לעשות מצות הרבה כי קשה... לעשות הרבה מצות... ועכ"ז ימצא בהם יראה הפנימית... מי שהוא צדיק... עושה מעט באופן היותר נאות (כנראה זהו דין דנר כאו"א) ובזה נחלק מצוה זו, והממה"מ להדר גוף המצוה (צ"ע הכוונה) עכ"ל.

וצ"ע א) דלפי"ז כת הטהורים, שהם פחותים מכת הצדיקים, הם כנגד הממה"מ והצדיקים הם כנגד המהדרים לחוד, וכלפי לייא?

ב) פשיטא דגם ביצי"מ היו כמה מדרי' בנ"י - וכדמוכח גם מהא דעל ים סוף נחלקו לארבע כתות כדאי' בירושלמי תענית פ"ב ה"ה - וכן במ"ת ועוד, וא"כ במה נשתנה נס חנוכה.

ג) יש להעיר בדקות יותר, דאין התירוץ מכוון להקושיא, דהשאלה מה נשתנה מצות נ"ח משאר מצות היא לא על זה דבנ"ח יש ג' אופנים בקיום המצוות (נר איש וביתו, נר לכאו"א, ומוסיף והולך) ובשאר המצוות אין כ"א ב' אופנים (לדוגמא: אתרוג כביצה, אתרוג גדול ממנו -ע' ב"ק ט, ב -).דמכמה טעמים אינה קושיא כ"כ: א) אי"ז חילוק באיכות אופני קיום המצוה אלא בכמות - ב) גם בשאר המצוות יש יותר משני אופנים, וכמו באתרוג דיש אתרוג כביצה, גדול ממנו שליש, גדול עוד יותר (יעויין שם בב"ק), ומצינו בדומה יותר למצות נ"ח - בשמן למנחות (מנחות פ"ו, א) דראשון שבראשון אין למעלה ממנו, למטה ממנו שני שבראשון כו', וקא חשיב ה' אופנים.ועוד בדומה יותר לנ"ח - בדין ד' מינים, דלדעת הרמב"ן צריך - למצוה מן המובחר - ג' הדסים שלמים, ואם אין לו צריך להיות עכ"פ ג' קטומים, ובדיעבד יוצא בא' קטום -(יעויין בנ"כ הרמב"ם הל' לולב פ"ז ה"ז, דמדאמר שמואל - סוכה לד, ב - דרשי לכו כר"ט ולא קאמר ר"ט ור"ע ביחד, משמע דיש הידור ג"כ בג' קטומים לגבי א' קטום) - ולהעיר ג"כ משמנה מעלות בצדקה (רמב"ם פ"י מהל' מתנות עניים) ועוד.

והשאלה בשינוי נ"ח משאר המצוות הוא על השינוי באיכות:דבכל המצוות לא מצינו כ"א מצוה והידור מצוה - וכמו באתרוג - הנ"ל - דהן גדול שליש או יותר משליש נכנס בסוג אחד דהידור מצוה, ועד"ז בשמן למנחות צריך להיות מהמובחר ביותר שיש תח"י וכמוש"נ כל חלב להוי' (רמב"ם סוף הל' אסה"מ) שכל האופנים נכללו בזה,משא"כ בנ"ח דמצינו סוג חדש דמהדרין מן המהדרין נוסף על סוג דהידור.- ולדוגמא: אם הי' לשון רז"ל בנ"ח: המהדרין נר לכאו"א למעלה מזה בש"א פוחת והולך כו' אז אין מקום לקושיא - אף שכל מש"כ בספר ברכת אברהם במקומו עומד, לבאר מפני מה יש מדליקין רק נר אחד ויש מוסיפים.

* * *

ומה שנלפענ"ד במענה השאלה מפני מה דוקא בנס חנוכה מצינו מהדרין מן המהדרין, הוא בהקדם ביאור - בקיצור, כי אכ"מ להאריך - בענין הידור מצוה וענין הניסים בכלל, ואז ממילא יובן מפני מה בנס חנוכה דוקא אמרו רז"ל דיש לא רק מהדרין כ"א גם ממה"מ.

דהנה אמרו רז"ל (ברכות רפ"ב) למה קדמה שמע לפ' והא"ש כדי שיקבל עליו עומ"ש תחלה ואח"כ יקבל עליו עול מצוות, והשכר על זה הוא כמש"נ והי' אם בחוקותי תלכו גו' ונתתי גשמיכם בעתם גו' - הנהגה טבעית על מלואה - לטובה.

והנה - כנראה גם בחוש - העושה מצד קב"ע ומורא האדון בלבד לא יעשה אלא כמה שמוכרח לעשות, כיון שמצד עצמו בהפקירא ניחא לי'.נוסף עליו מי שזיכך עצמו וכפף יצה"ר - כלשון הרמב"ם (שם) - אשר לא זו בלבד שיקיים המצוה אלא שגם יהדר בה וידקדק על עצמו גם במה שאינו חיוב גמור,כנגדו בשכר המצוות -

שכל מדותיו של הקב"ה מדה כנגד מדה (סנהדרין צ, א) -נותנין לו לא רק גשמיכם בעתם המגיע מצד ההנהגה (טובה, אבל עכ"פ) טבעית, היינו המחויבת מצד הנהגת הטבע,אלא שההנהגה עמו היא ג"כ לפנים משורת הדין, וגם אם עפ"י דין וחיוב הטבע יפול בצרה, ינצל ממנה ע"י נס שלמעלה מן הטבע.

וזהו שארז"ל (ברכות כ, ב) א"ל (הקב"ה) וכי לא אשא פנים לישראל שכתבתי להם בתורה כו' והם מדקדקים על עצמם כו'.

- והא דאיתא שם (כ, א) ראשונים מתרחש להו ניסא משום דקא מסרו נפשייהו על קדושת השם דוקא,הנה לבד דאין הכוונה מס"נ למיתה כ"א שאינו משגיח על כבודו וממונו אף אם אינו מחויב בזה, וכדמסיים בעובדא דר"א בר אהבה - הרי שם קאי בזה שתקובל תפלתו על הנהגה ניסית על כל הצבור -

והנה הנס דיצי"מ, דפורים, ענני הכבוד וכו' - באו בעיקרם להציל את ישראל מצרה העלולה לבוא עליהם - או שכבר באה,ולכן גם במצוות הקשורות עם ניסים האלו יש מצוה והידור מצוה.וכן בכללות כל המצוות - הרי יסודם ושרשם הוא אנכי ה"א אשר הוצאתיך מארץ מצרים שאמרז"ל (והבא בפירש"י במקומו) כדאי היא ההוצאה שתהיו משועבדים לי - לכן אמרו להם הנתאה לפניו במצוות.

נוסף על כל הנ"ל בנס חנוכה, שמלבד שהי' גם ענין ע"ד הנ"ל, היינו נצחון ונס המלחמה אשר מסרת גבורים ביד חלשים כו'.הנה עוד יש בה נס השמן - שלא בא להציל מצרה, כ"א - סימן לחביבות יותר גדולה - נס כדי שיוכלו בנ"י לקיים מצוה - לכן ניתוסף ג"כ בקיום מצותה חביבות יותר גדולה מהדרין מן המהדרין.

ובזה יומתק ג"כ הא דבחנוכה גופא - ענין דממה"מ הוא בהדה"נ ששייך לנס השמן, ולא בחיוב דלהודות ולהלל, כי דא גרים לדא.ומה שדוקא בחנוכה אירע נס כזה -מובן עפ"י המבואר (יעויין לבוש וט"ז או"ח סימן תר"ע) שהיונים לא ביקשו לשלוח ידם, וישראל ישבו על אדמתם וביהמ"ק בנוי וגזרת מלכות יון הי' רק להשכיחם תורתך ולהעבירם כו' וכמאמר רז"ל (ב"ר פ"ב) כתבו כו' שאין לכם חלק באלקי ישראל,- והמלחמה לא היתה אלא פועל יוצא מזה, ובזה יש ליישב ג"כ לשון הרמב"ם דריש הלכות חנוכה: ופשוטו ידם בממונם כו' - שלא יסתור למ"ש בלבוש וכו' -ולכן אז דוקא אירע נס כזה שהנשמה לבד נהנית בו.

Wednesday, November 17, 2021

Ask

Why does Yaakov want to know the name of the malach fighting with him?  Why does the malach retort back למה זה תשאל לשמי?  

The Gemorah Chullin (91) says that the fight kicked up dirt reaching the kisay hakovod.  The Kli Yakar says this represents that the ס"ם wants to blind a person (ס"ם מלשון סומא) from seeing the truth.  The ס"ם kicks up a cloud of dust obscuring one's view of the כסא הכבוד.  One of the tricks of the ס"ם is to advise a person to be blind in their faith.  Do not investigate, ask questions or be quizzical of ideas expressed.  Do not delve into the understanding of the Torah.  This leads down the path of eradicating the Torah שבעל פה and only accepting the Torah שבכתב.  

Yaakov wanted to know the malach's name to know his true essence, his identity, for the name indicates the essence.  He wanted to know how to beat the malach by understanding his true nature.  What is the answer the malach gives?  The sefer Shir Maon (grandson of Chassam Sofer, cited in Chasam Sofer on the parsha,) brings from the Haflah that when the malach informed Manoch לָ֥מָּה זֶּ֖ה תִּשְׁאַ֣ל לִשְׁמִ֑י וְהוּא־פֶ֛לִאי it was not a smart retort but his words were an answer to the question.  A malach is called after the name of his mission.  Since the mission of the malach was to inform Manoach about his son's nezirut he is called פלאי like כי יפליא לנדור נדר להזיר.  The Shir Maon  says the same thing in our possuk the malach is called שם because his mission is to give Yaakov a new name.  To add to the idea, the malach is called למה זה תשאל, he is known as why do you ask because his mission of subterfuge is fueled by not wishing to ask.  That is how Yaakov overcomes the angel, כי שרית by willing to ask the questions.  

The fast approaching holiday of Chanukah is introduced in the Gemorah by means of a question, מאי חנוכה.  Chanukah celebrates the Torah שבעל פה, the question and answer format. In the Al Hanissim prayer of Chanukah we add the words כשעמדה וכו על עמך ישראל as apposed to Purim where we just say עמד עליהם.  Why on Chanukah do we add the words על עמך ישראל?  Because on Chanukah we celebrate the becoming of ישראל, the holiday of the Torah שבעל פה.  That is the emphasis in the Al Hanissim. (based upon Shufra D'Yaakov.) 

Sunday, December 20, 2020

Opposite of Haughty

מכניע זדים.  Why do we say (according to those that have this text,) to subdue the wicked?  We also say in the al hanissim וזדים ביד עוסקי תורתך, why specifically the זדים and how is it the opposite of עוסקי תורתך?  The possuk in Mishlay (21:24) says זֵ֣ד יָ֖הִיר לֵ֣ץ שְׁמ֑וֹ ע֜וֹשֶֹ֗ה בְּעֶבְרַ֥ת זָדֽוֹן.  We see that a זד is one who does evil with a haughtiness.  That is why we pray that the insolent should be subdued (Sefaria translation.)  That was the battle against the Greeks.  Chazal enacted Chanukah as a holiday of הלל והודאה.  The word הודאה means submission like מודים חכמים לר"מ because to give thanks to someone, you must acknowledge that you need them (כמפורסם בשם רב הוטנר.)  The fight against the Greeks was a fight against this middah of זד.  The possuk in Mishlay teaches us that the haughtiness is called a לץ.  What is the connection between haughtiness and a לץ?  The לץ is not able to accept mussar, any adjustments to his/her life because s/he is ego-centric.  They believe that everything revolves around them and they have nothing to correct.  It is an ענף on being haughty.  Such a person can not bow themselves before the Torah.  That is why Chazal see the זד as the opposite of the עוסקי תורתך.  That is why the whole enactment of the holiday is to counteract זד through הודאה.  (Based upon a shmuz by R' Elefant.)  That is the סמיכות at the end of Shemone Esrai ונפשי כעפר לכל תהיה פתח לבי בתורתך (from Berachot 17a,) it is humility that is required to be able to acquire Torah (see Likutay Sichos volume 30 Toldot sicha 1.) 

The Kabbilistic books say that just as there is a Pharaoh of tumah in these parshiot, there is a level of  Pharaoh in kedusha.  The word פרעה can also be constructed as פריעה, to reveal (see the Zohar.)  The ability to reveal the light of soul.  The Alter Rebbe points out that פרעה has the same letters as העפר.  The way to accomplish this is by being humble.  It is through humility that one is able to love the self-focus on their own body and tap into the desire of the soul.  

Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Al Hanissim

My father shlita posted earlier this week that the Rambam understands קבעום ועשאום ימים טובים בהלל והודאה the הודאה is a reference to lighting the menorah.  He brings many sources in Rambam to support this idea.  The Riaz also understand the Gemorah this way.  However, Rashi understands that הודאה refers to the fact that we say al hanissim.  According to Rashi the establishment of Chanukah as a holiday is expressed in hallel and saying al hanissim.  This means that al hanissim is a way of mentioning the holiday like יעלה ויבא on Rosh Chodesh.  It is a mentioning of מעין המאורע just like יעלה ויבא (see Rashi Betzah 17a ד"ה בהודאה.)   However, the Rambam understands that it is a specific enactment to give thanks for the miracle but it is not a fulfillment of mentionning the holiday in prayer.  We can see this in the Rambam Laws of Tefillah (2:10,13)  בְּרָאשֵׁי חֳדָשִׁים וּבְחֻלּוֹ שֶׁל מוֹעֵד מִתְפַּלֵּל עַרְבִית שַׁחֲרִית וּמִנְחָה תְּשַׁע עֶשְׂרֵה בְּרָכוֹת כִּשְׁאָר הַיָּמִים וְאוֹמֵר בָּעֲבוֹדָה יַעֲלֶה וְיָבוֹא. בַּחֲנֻכָּה וּבְפוּרִים מוֹסִיפִין בְּהוֹדָאָה עַל הַנִּסִּים.  Why does he switch from אומר to מוסיף and why does he only say about יעלה ויבא that one prays תְּשַׁע עֶשְׂרֵה בְּרָכוֹת כִּשְׁאָר הַיָּמִים?  In light of how the Rambam learns we understand that the יעלה ויבא becomes part of the day's prayer, it is not a mere addition to the Shemonei Esrai, it transforms the Shemonei Esrai into a Rosh Chodesh Shemonei Esrai by mentioning מעין המאורע.  Al hanissim though does not make it a holiday prayer, it is just an addition to the prayer. That is why he only mentions the Shemonei Esrai with יעלה ויבא as being its own kind of Shemonei Esrai and about al hanissim he calls it just an addition.  (From a shiur of Rav Arial Ozar 5771.)