Friday, November 25, 2022

20 Years Of Adjustment

The Yerushalmi Bikkurim (3:3, 11b in the Vilna edition for those that didn't decide to change the pagination to fit their needs,) derives from Esav's marriage to מחלת from the word מחול that a chatan's sins are forgiven (see Torah Temima's explanation of the derash.)  The Midrash says Esav was מגייר and therefore obtained forgiveness.  The Mahari Basan (Lalchmay Todah siman 5) cited by Gilyonai Hashas Shabbat (89b) says that just as there is no punishment from shamayim until a person is 20 years old, so too a chatan who is likened to a ger who is likened to a newborn child, is given a 20-year pass from the time one gets married.  This is quite incredulous to say one can get married and have a 20-year pass.  Nonetheless, it could be that is what he holds.

In light of the opinion of the Gra about punishments from shamayim under 20 it is maybe more understandable.  The Gra (Even Shlema 10:26) says punishment isn't meted out until 20 years but from 20, one is held accountable for what they did in the past.  In other words, it takes 20 years for a person to develop enough to realize the errors of their past and they are expected to do teshuva during that time.  if one doesn't repent, then they're held culpable retroactively.  So too, says the Mari Basan, it takes 20 years for a person to fully adjust to one's new married life and therefore one is given 20 years to fix the problems that he causes in that timeframe.  We see that it takes 20 years to adjust to being married, ודו"ק.

Wednesday, November 23, 2022

Pray Like A Rich Man

 In last week's parsha, Yitzchak prayer is expressed as sicha, ויצא יצחק לשוח בשדה.  In this week's parsha, the prayer of Yitzchak is expressed as ויעתר.  Why are the two situations associated with different terminologies of prayer?  Furthermore, the prayer of sicha is associated with a poor person, תפילה לעני כי יעטוף ולפני ה ישפוך  שיחו  but עטר the Midrash (63:5) associates with praying with wealth, וַיֶּעְתַּר יִצְחָק לַה' לְנֹכַח אִשְׁתּוֹ (בראשית כה, כא) ,רַבִּי יוֹחָנָן אָמַר שֶׁשָּׁפַךְ תְּפִלּוֹת בְּעשֶׁר?

What is tefillah בעושר?  The Alter from Kelm (Chachma U'mussar volume 2 #1):













According to the Alter, tefillah is an avodah on one's Emunah.  It is an avodah of strengthening one's faith in Hashem's running of the world.  That is what it means to pray from עושר.  One is not praying due to a lacking of something, one feels that they have all like a עשיר, one is praying to remind themselves of their faith.   

I was thinking that there must be a difference between the prayer of Yitzchak when he is set to find his shidduch which is something that occurs in the natural world where a sicha is more appropriate to beseech for that event to occur vs. praying for his wife's closed womb to be opened which would not be a natural occurrence where a עטר, a constant prayer, reminder that it is Hashem's will for whatever is best to happen is better suited.  However, I'm not sure if that chiluk really explains the issue. 

Rav Asher Arieli Haskama

 Printed in the Sefer עלי הגיון:




Tuesday, November 22, 2022

Sicha As A (Non)Prayer

 Risiysa Laylah Ch. 31 ונראה דלשון שיחה הוא דבור שמן השפה ולחוץ ולא ממעמקי הלב שזה נקרא דבור. ולכך תפלת יצחק אבינו ע"ה נקרא לשוח (ברכות כו:) כי אברהם אבינו ע"ה שהוא המתחיל בתפלה היינו דוקא בכוונה שלימה נקרא עמידה כטעם מאמר רז"ל (סוטה יג סוף ע"ב) מה להלן עומד ומשמש כו' כי עמידה הוא רק לעבודה. ויצחק בא והוסיף דגם תפלה שלא בכוונה הוא תפלה וזהו דרגא דידיה דמחוי להו הקב"ה בעיניהו (שבת פט:) איך מלא כל הארץ כבודו ממש לנוכח העין. ובהכרה ברורה כזו אין שוב נפקא מינה בכונת לבו כמ"ש (ירושלמי ברכות פרק ב הלכה ד) אנא מן יומי לא כוונית כו' כי כאשר יש לו הכרה ברורה כזו זו כונה כוללת על כל מחשבותיו ודבוריו ומעשיו אף שיחת חולין שלו הכל מהשם יתברך לבד ואין עוד מלבדו ואין שום נפקא מינה בכונה כך או כך להשתדל על זה רק להניח הכל על השם יתברך ולהשתדל רק בעיקר הכונה דשויתי ה' לנגדי תמיד ממש לנגדי. ואז ממילא כאשר מקיים גול וגו' ויכונו וגו'. וזה נקרא דבר שאין מתכוין ולא מתעסק בעלמא דהרי מכל מקום צריך כונה כוללת כנ"ל וצריך לידע שהולך להתפלל וכמ"ש ויצא יצחק לשוח. שבאברהם היה עמידה דהיינו כל התפלה וביצחק רק יציאה

Rabbi Shimsohn Pinkus (this week's parsha, maamarim)























Sfas Emes (Chayeh Saraeh 5645) במדרש יפה שיחתן של עבדי אבות כו' כי יש בחי' עבד ובן. תורה ותפלה. ובני ישראל נקראו בנים שניתן להם התורה לחפש בגנזי דמלכא כבן. ותפלה היא עבודה ונקרא שיחה כמ"ש רז"ל לשוח בשדה. שהוא מעסקי האדם הצריך לו בעוה"ז ונקרא בגמ' חיי שעה והתורה חיי עולם. אכן ב' אלו המדריגות יש בהם כמה בחי'. ויש עבד ובן. אח"כ זוכין למעלת עבד בעולם העליון יותר. ואח"כ בן. וכן הוא תמיד. ובאופן זה אמרו כי יפה שיחתן של עבדי אבות שבחי' העבדות שלהם הי' גבוה מבחי' בן של דורות האחרונים שהרי משיחתן ותפלתן נעשה פרשיות בתורה.  

Sfas Emes (Chayeh Saraeh 5651) במדרש יפה שיחתן של עבדי אבות כו'. הוא בחי' תפלה אין שיחה אלא תפלה דאיתא בגמ' תורה חיי עולם ותפלה חיי שעה. וזה הדרך שתקנו אבות והוא עצה להיות נושע בכל עת ומקום. ובמדרש מי בכם ירא ה' שומע בקול עבדו כו'. שמזה הדרך של אליעזר יכולין ללמוד להיות נושע אף במקום החושך. הלך חשכים. ומעין זה בכל איש ישראל שנשתלח' הנשמה בעוה"ז עלמא דחשוכא. וע"י תפלה ותורה שבע"פ יכולין להיות נושע. והוא דרך ימי המעשה שנק' חשכים. והכל ניתקן בבחי' עבדות והנהגה מלמעלה על ידי מלאך. ובשבת קודש הוא בחי' בנים. ודרך התורה. וההנהגה על ידי הקב"ה בעצמו. לכן שבת יעשה כולו תורה. ובימי המעשה הוא בחי' שומע בקול עבדו. וע"י אמונה ובטחון כמ"ש יבטח בשם ה' כו'

There seems to be a dichotomy is sicha viewed as a lowly form of tefillah, a mere utterance of the words so it is not registered on the tefillah meter or it is such a great form of tefillah that it isn't measured because it exceeds the bar of tefillah.  I think that it isn't a contradiction but שיחה goes מריש כל דרגין עד סוף כל דרגין.  Sicha is a mere utterance of words without much intent.  It is more of talking to one's self than talking to Hashem.  That may be because the person feels so distant from Hashem that one doesn't feel that they can talk to Him or because one is so close to Hashem that they are always talking to Him even when not expressed in a formal manner.  The sicha of Yitzchak was due to his great closeness to Hashem he did not need to utter a formal prayer but the צורת התפילה is the same for one who feels quite distant. 

תְּ֭פִלָּה לְעָנִ֣י כִֽי־יַעֲטֹ֑ף וְלִפְנֵ֥י י֝״י֗ יִשְׁפֹּ֥ךְ שִׂיחֽוֹ (Tehillim 102:2.)  Sicha is the tefillah of the עני, the עני is אין עני אלא בדעת (Nedarim 41a.)  When is lacking daat, lacking a connection to Hashem, and can only muster up sicha, some words of desperation, that tefillah Yitzchak teaches us, enables for us perhaps, that it will be accepted.  Those words of calling out from whatever the trouble is, as the Sfas Emes says, become better than תורתן של בנים for it allows one to become connected to Hashme even in a state of great darkness. 

Thursday, November 17, 2022

Get Up

ויקם אברהם מעל פני מתו וידבר אל בני חת לאמר.  Why does it have to say Avraham got up, obviously he wasn't sitting in the same spot?  It doesn't mean merely that Avraham stood up. It means he aroused himself, he was able to move on from his grief and figure out the next step.  Rav Yeruchem in a mussar vein takes this as a lesson in interpersonal relationships.  It would not be not be becoming of Avraham to speak with the people in a state of misery and teary eyed.  Avraham got up, he wiped of his face and put on a descent face to talk to the people properly.  

The Gemarah Bava Bathra (91a-b) says ואמר רב חנן בר רבא אמר רב אותו היום שנפטר אברהם אבינו מן העולם עמדו כל גדולי אומות העולם בשורה ואמרו אוי לו לעולם שאבד מנהיגו ואוי לה לספינה שאבד קברינטא (דברי הימים א כט, יא).  Why did the world cry over Avraham, they disagreed with him, he was העברי, apart from everyone else?  Because despite his philosophical differences, he still cared for everyone and dealt with them as such.  The world recognized that and bemoaned the loss of their protector, friend and leader (on the two descriptions of the Gemarah see here.) 

Rabbi Lord Sacks (who's yartzeit was Monday,) applies this a general lesson as how to move beyond personal tragedy.  One must not wallow and sit in a state of misery but be able to get up and do something to be able to move forward in life.  He contrasts the actions of Avraham with that of Noach who after the flood got drunk, he let the misery he felt get the better of him and that literally stagnated his growth.  Of course dealing with loss and tragedy is difficult but after the proper time is allotted to deal with it one must take a step forward to continue growing.

Good Eye

וְהָיָ֣ה הַֽנַּעֲרָ֗ אֲשֶׁ֨ר אֹמַ֤ר אֵלֶ֙יהָ֙ הַטִּי־נָ֤א כַדֵּךְ֙ וְאֶשְׁתֶּ֔ה וְאָמְרָ֣ה שְׁתֵ֔ה וְגַם־גְּמַלֶּ֖יךָ אַשְׁקֶ֑ה אֹתָ֤הּ הֹכַ֙חְתָּ֙ לְעַבְדְּךָ֣ לְיִצְחָ֔ק וּבָ֣הּ אֵדַ֔ע כִּי־עָשִׂ֥יתָ חֶ֖סֶד עִם־אֲדֹנִֽי.  The siman for the right one is not only does she give Eliezer to drink as was requested of her but she adds that she will give the camels water.  The Kli Yakar cleverly notes that the word גמל is close to the words גמילות חסד as a hint that this proves she is a real chesed oriented individual.  Why does she have to add beyond the request of Eliezer to prove she is a baalat chesed?  The Kli Yakar says because doing chesed even with a being that's not her species, out of her orbit, proves she is a real baalat chesed and not just looking out for her own.  Some say that when one helps out someone who is in a state of need that may just be because one feels sorry for the other person.  It is a real chesed, a giving just to give, when one does chesed even if the other person doesn't need help.  Eliezer was a weary traveler and asked for water so Rivka may just feel bad for him and give him to drink.  It is only when she goes beyond that which the other person needs that proves she is helping just in order to do chesed.  I would just add that although she was not bound by a request of Eliezer, a young girl may feel intimated to grant the request of an elderly man such as Eliezer.  However, to add to his request proves she is a baalat chesed. 

The Kli Yakar adds רז״ל אמרו (תענית כד.) כל כלה שעיניה יפות כל גופה אין צריך בדיקה. וזה דבר שהחוש מכחיש כי כמה מכוערות בעולם שעיניהן יפות. ועוד קשה מה ראו חז״ל על ככה ליתן עצה לבדוק אחר יופי חיצוני זה והלא שקר החן והבל היופי, אלא ודאי שנתנו עצה לבדוק אחר מעשיה וזאת העצה היעוצה שיבדוק אם היא בעלת עין יפה וגומלת חסדים, כי אם עיניה יפות בבריות, אז היא בלי ספק שלימה בכל המדות, ולמדו רז״ל מן אליעזר שלא בדק את רבקה כי אם במדה זו כי מדה זו בנין אב על כל המדות.

I saw in the sefer Bishviley Haparsha that this may also be hinted to by the terminology the Torah uses.  Eliezer meets Rivka at a spring of water, normally called a באר which is the word used in pessukim 11,20.  However, many more times during the episode it is called עין המים.  Why is this terminology used?  He suggests it is hinting to this idea, to look at the eye.  To see is she has a good eye (not in baseball,) to be a giving person (see more about the relationship here.) 

[It is still צ"ע why it switches from באר to עין and back and as pointed out in the linked article, Hagar is approached by the malach at the עין המים and she calls it באר לחי רואי, why the switch?  (See the Malbim by the episode of Hagar here, but that doesn't seem to help us in our parsha.)   See also here a connection between Yitzchak and באר לחי רואי.]

We see from the hanhaga in this episode that was most important to check into the prospective shidduch was if the girl is a baalat chesed. 

The Pillar of Stability

Harav Hagaon Yosef Elefant Shlita

The passuk says: וְאַבְרָהָם זָקֵן בָּא בַּיָּמִים. The simple meaning of this phrase is that Avraham Avinu was growing old, getting on in years. But the Zohar Hakadosh interprets this phrase to mean that Avraham Avinu “came with all his days” — when he reached the end of his life, he brought all his days with him, not losing any of them. This means that he utilized his opportunities, but it means, primarily, that he created a consistency: All his days were a continuum.

In other words, the ability to come with all one’s days is not merely a sign that the person maximized his potential; it also means that he kept on growing constantly.  What is the secret that enables a person to “come with all his days”?

In last week’s parashah, after Sedom is overturned, the Torah says: וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם אֶת פְּנֵי ה'. Chazal derive a few insights from this passuk. From the words אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם, the Gemara (Berachos 6b) derives that Avraham Avinu established a makom kavua for his prayer, and teaches that whoever establishes a makom kavua for davening receives Hashem’s assistance: כל הקובע מקום לתפלתו אלקי אברהם בעזרו.

Now, the simple meaning is that Avraham Avinu had a geographical makom kavua where he davened. But there’s a deeper message here as well, and that is reflected in another teaching of Chazal in connection with this passuk. Chazal link this passuk with the passuk in Tehillim that states: מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה' וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ. The words מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה' allude to Avraham at the Akeidah, say Chazal, while the words וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ allude to Avraham’s holding onto his position and staying there, as the passuk says: וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם.

A person can reach incredible heights, as Avraham did at the Akeidah — that’s מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה'. In contrast, ּוּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ refers to a person who’s stable and steady, holding onto his position and staying there. At times, it can be relatively easy to climb the mountain, but it’s a lot harder to stay in that place and hold onto that level. In expounding the words וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם, Chazal praise Avraham for returning to the place where he was the day before. On that day, Avraham davened, but Hashem didn’t accept his tefillos. Yet he got up the next morning and continued from the same place where he had been the previous day.

This would seem to be a pretty simple act on Avraham’s part: He davened in the same place where he davened the day before. Yet this is the act that Chazal point to as the paradigm of holding on steadily to one’s spiritual level: וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ.

Sometimes we think that in order to hold onto one’s level, a person has to make major, dramatic changes. Yet Chazal are telling us that just davening in the same place that you davened the day before creates stability. Long-term growth and consistency in avodas Hashem is not built on dramatic changes; it’s based on a person’s daily routine, doing the same thing day after day, davening in the same place and the same situation.

Avraham returned to the same place even though he had failed the day before. That’s the secret of consistency — not starting each time anew, but taking a position and going with it. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t. Sometimes the tefillah is heard, and sometimes it’s not. The secret of אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם sheds light on Chazal’s other statement that whoever establishes a makom kavua for davening receives Hashem’s assistance. Chazal don’t just mean an actual geographic location where a person sits each time he davens; they are referring to a person who has successfully created a consistency, and isn’t jumpy, doing things one day like this and one day like that.

A third teaching that Chazal derive from these words is that Avraham instituted the tefillah of Shacharis. Amidah is a lashon of prayer, so the words אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם indicate that Avraham davened. Yitzchak, we know, instituted Minchah, as the passuk in this week’s parashah says, וַיֵּצֵא יִצְחָק לָשׂוּחַ בַּשָּׂדֶה, while Yaakov instituted Maariv: וַיִּפְגַּע בַּמָּקוֹם.

The Sfas Emes notes that these tefillos parallel the attributes of each of the Avos. Avraham’s middah was ahavah; Hashem referred to him אַבְרָהָם אֹהֲבִי, as we read in last week’s haftarah. Yitzchak’s middah was yirah — Pachad Yitzchak, and Yaakov’s middah was emes. The Sfas Emes explains that the reason Yaakov instituted Maariv, specifically, is that emes — which is ויצית ונכון וקיים — implies the creation of something lasting. Yaakov Avinu’s tefillah is at the end of the day, when a person wraps up his avodah, so that he can perpetuate and hold onto whatever he achieved during the day.

Yitzchak’s tefillah, Minchah, is said during the day. The words וַיֵּצֵא יִצְחָק לָשׂוּחַ בַּשָּׂדֶה implies that he’s out in the field, doing his everyday tasks. For that you need yirah; ahavah doesn’t work when you’re out on the street.

But Avraham Avinu is ahavah. The Sfas Emes explains that וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר means that before he did anything else, he davened to Hakadosh Baruch Hu. That’s ahavah: putting the loved one before all other activities. When Avraham Avinu got up early in the morning and davened, he showed his ahavah for Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

The power of Shacharis, in all generations, is putting Hakadosh Baruch Hu before all other interests. That’s run by the engine of ahavah.

Regarding the words (Yeshayah 41:8): אַבְרָהָם אֹהֲבִי, Rashi comments that Avraham Avinu is called ohavi because he had no one to teach him; he came to know Hashem through his love for Him. No one gave him tochachah; he had no rebbi or father to teach him. What powered him was the engine of ahavah, and that ahavas Hashem brought him to recognize Hashem.

We generally think it was the other way around — Avraham recognized Hashem, and that brought him to ahavah. But Rashi is telling us the opposite: Avraham’s love for Hakadosh Baruch Hu, after seeing Him in the briah, propelled him to an immense love for Him, and that led him to all his intellectual attainments. This idea is reflected in the words וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר.

So, we have three derashos on this passuk: establishing a makom kavua for davening, Avraham returning to his place of the previous day — וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ, and his instituting Shacharis with an act of ahavah, וַיַּשְׁכֵּם, prioritizing Hakadosh Baruch Hu before anything else. And that ahavah explains the consistency of Avraham Avinu.

The more we develop our ahavas Hashem, and the more we look at the briah and see the chessed that Hakadosh Baruch Hu has done for us, the more we can create the וַיַּשְׁכֵּם, the to place the Eibishter before anything else. And that’s the engine that creates the וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ and the קובע מקום לתפלתו . The consistency of the relationship is a derivative of the ahavah that a person awakens in himself for Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

This is what it means that Avraham Avinu was בָּא בַּיָּמִים, he came with all his days. He was a pillar of consistency, stability, and continuity: אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם. And he was a pillar of Ahavah.

Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Think About It

 Shulchan Aruch Alter Rebbe Ch. 2 law 12:  

 וכל אדם צריך ליזהר להוציא בשפתיו ולהשמיע לאזניו כל מה שלומד בין במקרא משנה ותלמוד אלא אם כן בשעת עיון להבין דבר מתוך דבר וכל מה שלומד בהרהור לבד ואפשר לו להוציא בשפתיו ואינו מוציא אינו יוצא בלימוד זה ידי חובת מצות ולמדתם אותם וכמ"ש לא ימוש ספר התורה הזה מפיך והגית בו וגו' וכמו בכל המצות התלויות בדבור שאינו יוצא בהן ידי חובתו בהרהור אלא אם כן שומע מפי המדבר שהשומע כעונה בפיו. אך אם מוציא בשפתיו אף על פי שאינו מבין אפילו פירוש המלות מפני שהוא עם הארץ הרי זה מקיים מצות ולמדתם ולפיכך כל עם הארץ מברך ברכת התורה בשחר לפני הפסוקים וכן כשעולה לספר תורה.

The simple read is that one fulfills Talmud Torah only when speaking the words.  The Rebbe says that what it is saying is one doesn't fulfill ולמדתם אותם but there is a kium of והגית.  

The Rebbe (Chiddushhim Ubiurin Beshas VeRambam siman 18) footnote 21:


I don't understand where do we see that והגית is a separate mitzvah of learning Torah?  This is reminiscent of a past post here

Looking Toward The Future

From Rav Kook

 לז. קדושת הזווג והמשפחה

מצד קדושת המעשה וקדושת המחשבה, הפועלת לקבע קדושת הטבע והרצון ביסוד יסודו, עד לקדושת הזיווג בעצמות הטבע הטהור והקדוש, כדוגמת האדם לפני החטא, ולמעלה למעלה גם על ידי השאיפה לקדושת עולמים זו, מתעדן כל הקישור הנפשי, ויחס המשפחה מתקשר בחוטי קודש קדשים, שהם חזקים ואמיצים מאד, וגורם שפע חיים ארוכים לתולדותיו. ומיסוד צדיק כזה מושפע שפע החיים והעדינות, העז והאומץ, וגם ישות החיים בגדולה, וגוברת עז על כל החיים, על כל הנלווים אליו, על כל הדור, על כל העולם. אומץ מוסיף אומץ, חיים ממשיכים חיים, כבוד ותפארת מזהיר תפארת והדרת קודש על כל.

לח. הנטיה המינית לעתיד

הנטיה המינית הולכת היא וזורמת אל העתיד, אל שכלול החיים, שיביא הזמן, את חיי העולם הבא בעולם הזה, ומתוך שהחיים העתידים הנם מלאים הוד ונועם מלא, על כן גדולה היא שאיפת החפץ ועז הרצון של נטית עולמים זאת, והקדושה המגמתית רק עליה היא משרה את אורה, והנפש הטהורה מנהגת את נטיה זו למגמתה, בגידור התורה, החכמה, היושר והצניעות, מקורי הצדק. כל מאן דנטיר ברית איקרי צדיק. ויסוד קדושתן של ישראל הוא קשור בעולם העתיד, ורוח קדושה הולך וחופף על כלל האומה ופרטיה. ועמך כלם צדיקים.

Not sure what this means but he attempts to explain why some of the craziness in the world is what it is now.

Friday, November 11, 2022

Innermost Desire

וישא אברהם את עיניו וירא והנה איל אחר נאחז בסבך בקרניו וילך אברהם ויקח את האיל ויעלהו לעלה תחת בנו

Why did the איל Avraham offered as a korban have to be designated on Friday בין השמשות?  Chazal (Pirkey D' Rebbe Eliezer Ch. 30) identifies the horns of the ram as the horn blown at Mattan Torah and the horn of Mashiach.  Why is this ram so important that it is designated to be used for the most important points in history?  

The words אחר seems meaningless, what it does it mean another ram?  Chazal translate the word אחר as in אחרי, afterward; either later in history on Rosh Hashana we should blow the shofar to arose mercy or in the days of the future the horn will be blown to redeem us even though we are stuck in averot.  What does that have to do with the story of Avraham?   .

The nisayon of the Akedah was to prove it Avraham's ultimate passion was for the commandment of Hashem.  The passing of the nisayon established that the pnemious of Avraham was to be attached to Hashem.  His essence, his DNA was connection to Hashem.  He passed that down into the generations that followed.  Therefore, even when our merits can be called not question, when the pitfalls of life may have led us astray, the horn of the ram awakens the pnimious to come out and be worthy of redemption of vindication in judgement.  

This deep inner connection to Hashem was transferred into the ram and that is why it is used for events which are an outgrowth of the connection that Klal Ysirael has.  That is why the ram was created Friday bein hashmashot.  It is the bridge between teva and beyond teva.  The teva is the סיבוך surrounding the ram, the hardships of life.  The מעל לטבע is the pnemious connection that can't be severed. 

Rashi (22:2) cites Chazal say Hashem said to Avraham please pass this test so that people don't say the first one's were nothing.  Why if he failed the akedah are the previous tests meaningless?  Because this test was to see if the pnemious of avraham, if his ultimate desire, when everything else was on the line was with Hashem or not. 

Bowing For Redemption

 The Midrash (56:2) אָמַר רַבִּי יִצְחָק הַכֹּל בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, וְאַבְרָהָם לֹא חָזַר מֵהַר הַמּוֹרִיָּה בְּשָׁלוֹם אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, וְנִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה וְנָשׁוּבָה אֲלֵיכֶם. יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא נִגְאֲלוּ אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות ד, לא): וַיַּאֲמֵן הָעָם וגו' וַיִקְדּוּ וַיִּשְׁתַּחֲווּ. הַתּוֹרָה לֹא נִתְּנָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות כד, א): וְהִשְׁתַּחֲוִיתֶם מֵרָחֹק. חַנָּה לֹא נִפְקְדָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמואל א א, כח): וַיִּשְׁתַּחוּ שָׁם לַה': הַגָּלֻיּוֹת אֵינָן מִתְכַּנְסוֹת אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (ישעיה כז, יג): וְהָיָה בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא יִתָּקַע בְּשׁוֹפָר גָּדוֹל וגו' וְהִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לַה' בְּהַר הַקֹּדֶשׁ בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם. בֵּית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ לֹא נִבְנָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (תהלים צט, ט): רוֹמְמוּ ה' אֱלֹהֵינוּ וְהִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לְהַר קָדְשׁוֹ. הַמֵּתִים אֵינָן חַיִּין אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (תהלים צה, ו): בֹּאוּ נִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה וְנִכְרָעָה נִבְרְכָה לִפְנֵי ה' עֹשֵׂנוּ.

What is the significance of bowing?  It is not the mere physical act of bowing but an inner bowing.  Bowing is an expression of complete subordination before someone else.  By acknowledging that one is totally dependent on Hashem one merits redemption.  See here and Nesivot Shalom. 

Sunday, November 6, 2022

Milah Points

The Bartenura on the Torah (17:24) says וקשה לפי זה למה המתין כל כך למול את עצמו. י"ל משום דהא דאמרינן שקיים כל המצות היינו לאחר שנמול אבל קודם לכן לא היה לו דעת לקיים מצות ולא נפתחו עיני שכלו וכדפרש"י לעיל שלא היה בו כח לסבול גלוי השכינה ולעמוד.  According to the Bartenura, Avraham fulfilled all the mitzvot only after his Milah.  The Maharsha in Yevamot (100b) suggests the same idea to explain how Avraham could marry Hagar, who was a first generation Egyptian, whom one is prohibited from marrying?  He says, it must be Avraham only kept the Torah after his Milah.  (According to the Maharsha it still is difficult how did Avraha marry  קטורה who Chazal identify as Hagar, at that point it was after Avraham's bris?)  See here where he cites Rishonim deal with the question about Hagar.   

According to the Bartenura, the bris milah of Avraham was not a mere mitzvah like any other but it was a transformation of his entire being.  This is supported from the Midrash beginning of Vaerah which comments on the greater level of Avraham after the milah.  

The Gemarah Avodah Zarah (27a) has a machlokes tanaim if Milah has to be done lishma.  The opinion of R' Yose is that it does not.  The Yaavetz asks a contradiction because in Yevamot (46b) R' Yose says if one comes before Beit Din with a milah having been done we can't just do the tevilah part because it is possible the milah was not done lishma.  But R' Yose doesn't hold a milah has to be done lishma?  The Chasam Sofer (Yoreh Deah teshuva #1,300) answers by differentiating between the milah of a yisrael and that of one who wants to be converted.  The regular mitzvah of milah for a Yisrael does not have to be one lishma but to enter into the Jewish nation one requires their milah being done lishma.  The Meshech Chachma (end of Lech Lecha and Bo) also suggests this idea as does Rav Yosef Engel. 

The possuk (17:23) says that Avraham gave all the people in his household a milah and then the last possuk in the parsha (17:27) repeats that Avraham gave them a milah.  Why does it repeat this?  The Ramban says that Avraham first gave everyone else a milah and then he gave himself a milah.  How could he give them a milah if he himself didn't have a milah (according to the opinion in Avodah Zarah that only one who has a milah can give a milah?)  The Chasam Sofer says that since Avraham was intending to get a milah he is considered to have a milah.  But that is only if he ended up getting a milah.  That's what the last possuk means, only after Avraham gave himself a milah was their milah complete (that is how it is נמלו אתו, with his bris their bris was complete as well.) 

The Tosfat Yeshanim in Yevamot asks the question of the Yaavetz and answers that R' Yose said in Avodah Zarah a milah doesn't have to be done lsihma only when a Jew is standing over the gentile telling him to do the milah lishma.  In other words, R' Yose also holds a milah has to be done lishma but it suffices it a gentile does it when a Jew tells him what to do.  This is very difficult to read into the Gemarah Avodah Zarah.  See also Achiezer volume 3 siman 27. 

The Avnei Nazer Yoreh Deah (345 end of the teshuva) takes issue with the Chasam Sofer for (if I understand his question correctly,) for if a milah not done lishma is considered a milah then the ger should be no different from someone who doesn't have an ערלה that wants to become a ger where he just does tevilah?  His question is propitiated on the assumption that there is no הטפת דם ברית in those situations which is a machlokes Rishonim.  But even if those cases don't require הטפת דם ברית here it is worse for in those scenarios the ger doesn't have an ערלה, so he just does tevilah but here the ger was an ערל and a milah no done lishma doesn't remove the ערלה status vis-a-vis gerus.  

R' Yose learns his law of milah lishma from the parsha here (17:13) הִמּ֧וֹל ׀ יִמּ֛וֹל יְלִ֥יד בֵּֽיתְךָ֖ וּמִקְנַ֣ת כַּסְפֶּ֑ךָ וְהָיְתָ֧ה בְרִיתִ֛י בִּבְשַׂרְכֶ֖ם לִבְרִ֥ית עוֹלָֽם, he learns the double verb teaches that circumcision may be performed by anyone.  However, if we put the idea of the Bartenura and the Chasam Sofer together it is difficult for this is the milah of gerus and there everyone requires it to be lishma?

Gilgul Of Women

 From דברי יעקב on ברכות 






From נפשי בשאלתי by Rav Yaakov Lugassy 










Anybody know anything about gilgul of women? 

Thursday, November 3, 2022

A Journey, 7 And An Oath

I said this at a sheva berachot of my cousin this week.  

The Midrash (Bamidbar Rabbah 11:2) says אָמַר רַבִּי פִּינְחָס בֶּן יָאִיר שֶׁבַע בְּרָכוֹת בֵּרַךְ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא אֶת אַבְרָהָם, וְאֵלּוּ הֵן: וְאֶעֶשְׂךָ לְגוֹי גָּדוֹל (בראשית יב, ב): וַאֲבָרֶכְךָ (בראשית יב, ב): וַאֲגַדְלָה שְׁמֶךָ (בראשית יב, ב): וֶהְיֵה בְּרָכָה (בראשית יב, ג): וַאֲבָרְכָה מְבָרְכֶיךָ (בראשית יב, ג): וּמְקַלֶּלְךָ אָאֹר (בראשית יב, ג): וְנִבְרְכוּ בְךָ. כְּנֶגֶד שִׁבְעָה פְּסוּקִים שֶׁבְּמַעֲשֵׂה בְרֵאשִׁית שֶׁכָּתוּב בָּהֶן כִּי טוֹב.  What does the כי טוב of Berashit have to do with Avraham?  

 וַיֹּ֤אמֶר י״י֙ אֶל־אַבְרָ֔ם לֶךְ־לְךָ֛ מֵאַרְצְךָ֥ וּמִמּֽוֹלַדְתְּךָ֖ וּמִבֵּ֣ית אָבִ֑יךָ אֶל־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֥ר אַרְאֶֽךָּ.  The question is, the possuk is out of order, it should have first said בית אביך and end with ארצך because one first leave's their father's house and ends up with leaving the entire country?  The Chassideshe seforim explain that Avraham wasn't just instructed to physically leave his father's country, Avraham is being instructed to leave the ideology of where he came from behind.  The ideology, the spiritual trappings and mindset of a idolator has to be left behind and Avram was to become Avraham, the founder of the Jewish nation.  This transformation doesn't happen merely by taking steps but is a mental process that one goes through.  That process started by Avraham leaving behind the ideology of the general country and continued until he diverged himself of the  false believes of his father.  

Avraham's leaving of Charan going to Eretz Yisrael was his berashit.  It was not just a journey of space but a mental odyssey to transform himself.  There was a לֶךְ to לְךָ֛, for Avraham to discover his inner being.  This was Avraham's berashit, his beginning of creating Klal Yisrael.  That is why the 7 berachot parallel the seven times of כי טוב in Berashit. 

But why 7 berachot, why does he need 7 berachot specifically?  

The Gemarah Niddah (30b) says before the soul comes into the world משביעין אותו תהי צדיק ואל תהי רשע.  What is the point of this oath if no one remembers it and one is given free reign to ignore it?  The Tzemach Tzedek explains that the word שבועה has the root of שבע, satiated, for taking an oath fills one up with power to overcome difficulties.  It helps bring to the forefront dormant abilities within a person as one is deeply committed to the cause so much so they have made an oath to fulfill it.  The challenges of the world are so great that the soul needs the push of the שבועה to help one overcome the challenges thrown at a person.  Similarly, the word for the number 7, שבע is the same root.  As is well known form the Maharal, 7 is the completion of טבע.  It is the full power, the complete satiation of טבע.  The 7 berachot given to Avraham were to give him the push, to give him the ability to bring to the forefront all in his capabilities to stand up to the challenge of being העברי, on the other side of the pressing issues of the day.  It was a slight aid to push Avraham over the edge to be successful in his mission.

Origins Of Shabtai Tzvi

From the Meor Vashemesh Emor

ונראה בזה ע"פ מה דאיתא בגמרא מנין לבעל קרי שאסור בדברי תורה ודרש הגמ' שאף לר' יהודא שאינו דורש סמוכים בכל התורה במשנה תורה דרש ולמדו בגמרא מן והודעת לבניך ולבני בניך וסמיך לי' יום אשר עמדת לפני ה' אלהיך בחורב מה להלן ברתת ובזיע ובאימה וביראה אף כאן באימה וביראה ברתת ובזיע נמצא למידין מכאן שאי אפשר לו לאדם שישיג תכלית יראת ה' אלא אם נזהר בטבילת עזרא וכן פרש"י למעלה בד"ה שאני בהמ"ז הביא רש"י לשנא אחרינא שאני תפלה דלית בי' קבלת מלכות שמים אבל ק"ש דאית בי' קבלת מ"ש שמקבל את הש"י לאדון ולמלך מיוחד אסור להרהר בו עד שיטבול הרי שבלתי אפשר לידע מההיא יראה שילמוד ויתפלל ברתת ובזיע כי אם שיהי' נזהר בטבילת עזרא ואם הוא לומד או מתפלל ואינו נזהר בטבילה זו אי אפשר בשום אופן להגיע לגופי תורה ומצות ואם הוא לומד ספרי קבלה והוא בלתי טהור יוכל לבוא חלילה עי"ז לידי אפיקורסות ובזמנים הקודמים שהי' דבר ה' יקר בימים ההם ולא היו יודעים מיראת הרוממת כלל זאת הי' מחמת שהיו לומדים תורה ולא נזהרו בטבילה זו והכת ש"ץ ימ"ש שהיו אז בימים ההם ומזה נעשו אפיקורסים שלמדו ספרי קבלה בטומאת הגוף והיה העולם שמם עד שבאו שני המאורות הגדולים לעולם הבעש"ט הקדוש ואדמ"ור הרב רבינו אלימלך נבג"מ והם פתחו שער לה' צדיקים יבואו בו שלא יהרהר אדם שום הרהור תורה עד שיטבול עצמו לקריו שחכמי הגמרא לא בטלהו אלא מפני שאין רוב הציבור יכולין לעמוד בה אבל אותן האנשים הרוצים להשיג גופי התורה ומצות צריכין להיות נזהר מאד בטבילה זו

Tuesday, November 1, 2022

Worker And Partner

It was posted in the past that there is a major difference between Avraham and Noach. Avraham made it his practice to teach the ways of Hashem to the world while Noach was not engrossed in teaching people the path to teshuva.  Noach thought it was best to avoid having the actions of those around him rub off on himself while Avraham thought it better to teach others to be like himself.  Why did they have these different attitudes?  And why did Avraham's concern for others extend to praying for them, even wicked people like Sedomites while Noach is criticized in Chazal for not praying for his generation, why did he not Noach not pray for them? 

Rav Pinkus gives a mashal to explain the difference from two different types of people in a business, a partner and a worker.  The partners' bottom line is governed by how successful the business is.  He cares if the business is going in the right direction or not.  The worker doesn't care about the success of the business, he just wants to walk home with a paycheck at the end of the week.  This difference comes to the forefront when there is an emergency such as the building is on fire.  The partner will rush to save the building for that is his investment.  The worker doesn't care about the fire as long as he has a job to return to. 

This was the difference between Noach and Avraham.  Noach was G-d's worker.  He punched in and punched out.  If the world collapses it doesn't matter as long as he gets his check, as long as he is safe.  Avraham was a partner with Hashem.  It mattered to him if Sedom is overturned, if people are worshipping avodah zarah.  He cared about the success of the world, not just his personal success.  He was interested in G-d's business, if the world recognizes Hashem.  Avraham left a yerusha to become a שותף with Hashem, not a mere פועל.