The Gemorah Avodah
Zara (43a) says its forbidden to make a table that looks like the shulchan or
a lamp like the menorah because there is an issur to make a copy
of the kli mkdash. Why doesn’t it
say a washbasin can’t be made to look like the kiyor? According to the Sferno it’s not difficult
for its not considered part of the kli mikdash. The Mikdash David (2:1) says that the issur
is only on the Shulchan and menorah for the halacha dictates
how they must be made, however there is no commandment how to make the details
of the kiyor, hence there is no prohibition of making a copy of it.
The Rambam Bias Mikdash 5:10 rules that לכתחילה the kohanim should wash their hands and
feet from the kiyor. The Ramban
(our parsha) disagrees and proves from the kohan gadol on yom
kippur that would be mekadesh from a golden jug that even לכחתילה
any כלי שרת may be used.
However, according to the Briskor Rav that explains the kiddush of
the kohan gadol is a separate parsha and din from parshas
Acharei Mos, distinct from the halacha of our parsha, the
Rambam is very understandable. It is
only in our parsha, where the kiyor is mentioned that the Rambam
requires it to be used לכחתילה,
however the kiddush of the kohan gadol doesn’t require the kiyor
at all. [My friend S.K. told me that
the Briskors use this Briskor Rav to answer this Rambam, see Maadanei Moshe #51
where Rav Moshe Brown asks many questions on this Briskor Rav and in #52 gives a different approach.]
Even though the kiyor isn't even part of the mishkan according to the Sforno, we find it had an advantage that it was made out of the מראות הצובאות which Hashem says are the most precious to Him (see Rashi Vayakhal.) The lesson is that it is that one's overcoming of the yetzer harah demonstrated by the מראות הצובאות is even more precious even than the korbanot themselves (based upon Likutay Sichos volume 6.)
Even though the kiyor isn't even part of the mishkan according to the Sforno, we find it had an advantage that it was made out of the מראות הצובאות which Hashem says are the most precious to Him (see Rashi Vayakhal.) The lesson is that it is that one's overcoming of the yetzer harah demonstrated by the מראות הצובאות is even more precious even than the korbanot themselves (based upon Likutay Sichos volume 6.)
I don't understand the mikdash dovid's question. maybe b'emes one is not allowed to make a copy of the kiyor, and the gemara gives a couple of examples, but not an exclusive list.
ReplyDeleteDoes S.K. have to be anonymous?
ReplyDeleteThe Mikdash David assumes the Gemorah is literal, isn't that a valid assumption (the minchas chinuch makes the same assumption and asks why is the aron not included, according to you, why does the Gemorah give only 2 (and onlt 2) examples
ReplyDelete