Achashverosh wasn’t so keen on killing out an entire nation
from his kingdom. Haman assuaged his
concerns because klal yisroel is scattered among the nations and their
absence won’t be noticed (13b). This explanation
of עם מפוזר
ומפורד, wasn’t just to calm Achashverosh, it was why Haman thought he
could be successful. We are strong when
united but fall when divided. Haman
noticed a lack of unity amongst us. (See
the Maharal on the verse (3:8) yeshnu am echad why the word yeshnu is
used as opposed to yesh, to indicate separation, for the hey and nun
don’t combine with any other number to complete a unite of ten or hundred.) And that was why he sensed he could be successful
in his attempt of annihilation.
The antidote to Haman
was through the unification of klal yisroel. The Alshich explains that we give a half shekel
to recognize that you need someone else to complete you. The shekalim show the achdus of
klal yisroel and therefore they are able to counteract the actions of
Haman. The kemitza demonstrated achdus
as well. Rav Yosef Engel (Otzros
Yosef 4,4) explains that a kmetiza is made up of two zeisim and
is combined in the hand. The combination
of many parts symbolizes the unification of the many bodies of klal yisroel. He adds that it was the kemitza of the
omer, offered on Pesach, represented by Avraham, who taught יחוד השם
to the world. He suggests that’s why meshloach
manos is two items united in the givers hand.
The ketores had the power to include the chelbana. The chelbana smells bad and
represents the sinners that are included together with the rest of klal yisroel. That’s why Mordechai is represented by the ketores
for he was the leader to bring klal yisroel together to avert the evil
decree of Haman. The end of the Megillah
reflects the unity achieved by klal yisroel, as the Gra points out kimmu
ve’kiblu hayihudim is said in a singular terminology. Klal yisroel become united and
reaccepted the Torah together.
No comments:
Post a Comment