Many of the Chassidic masters discouraged the learning of chakirah,
even that which is found in the Rishonim such as Bechai and the Rambam. In Sur Marah V’Aseh Tov the Zlotchover
explains that their holy words were only written for the needs of the
generation who were misled by the philosophers.
However, those whose faith is pure have no need to be busied with
philosophical inquiries. He cites the
Rashi (Beshalach 17:8) that Klal Yisroel was like a child riding on the shoulders
of his father, protecting him from danger and the child questions the father’s
presence. The father said, you question
my presence? When a dog came, the father
threw the son off and he was bit, so he learnt the hard way who was his
protector. Amalek is the dog that came
to attack. The Zlotchover says we are
the son, Hashem is leading us through life, there is no room for question. It is not that the Chassidic masters were
afraid of questions, it was irrelevant to their religious experience. A person that lives with Hashem, who
recognizes Hashem’s constant presence, sees Hashem in all the world doesn’t
have any room for questions. That is the
kind of religious experience the Chassidic masters had and were trying to pass
on to their followers. This emunah
p’shutah isn’t for fear of questions, it is a completely different
wavelength. Why is it Amalek that is the
dog that comes to bite?
It is well known that עמלק shares the numerical value of ספק. One who’s faith is based upon human
intelligence always has room for doubt.
There is always an irrational argument to deflect any proof. However, when one sees something else there
is no room for doubt, there could be a million questions, but since it was seen
it is known to be true. The only room
there is for Amalek to attack is if one’s faith isn’t limited by the mind. It if is felt in the heart, there is no room
for an Amalek attack. The fact that Klal
Yisroel could question the presence of Hashem stemmed from an internal עמלק
attack. After seeing all the makkos,
krieas yam suf and all the miracles it made no sense not to feel the
presence of Hashem. It was only an
internal עמלק,
therefore it was the nation of עמלק
that came to attack.
The neshama knows God, it saw God before descending
into the world. The חכמה שבנפש is this knowledge of
God embedded within a person that is above question. It saw God and has no ספק of His existence and doesn’t wasn’t to be
separate from Him. That is what it means
the neshama understands. It is a
true Godly teaching that can’t be fathomed by the limitation of the body, but
it is seen by the soul.
That is why Chazal teach that one should drink until they
lose their brains on Purim. Is the
intellect that Amalek uses to muddle our recognition of Hashem, therefore, we
remove our intellect to reveal the pure faith of our neshama.
The seven nations represent the seven middos. The Tanya teaches בטבע מוח שליט על הלב. We can change out middos for the better
by controlling them with our brains. It
is the battle against Amalek that can’t be won with pure brainpower because Amalek
confuses it. For that a זכירה is necessary. Something that is constantly remembered isn’t
part of the brains, it becomes part of the essence of the person and that’s why
its not subject to forgetting. It is
when the Emunah of a person is part of the person that Amalek doesn’t
have any effect (see Tzemech Tzedek in Derech Mitzvosecha.)
Is this quality specific to the נשמת ישראל or would even a נשמה מן שאר האומות?
ReplyDeleteI don't understand how it answers for Rav Bloch. What do kabbalistic teachings have to do with ידיעת השם? Unless you are extending that just like ידיעת השם so to the neshama knows other secrets.
Also, we understand that the chassidish approach to emunah is not afraid of questions, but for those bothered by the questions, it seems that the zlotchover would agree with the limud of sifrei chakirah, just not as a l'chatchila. (probably would also try some approach to bring the ידיעת הנשמה מן הכח אל הפועל. what do you think would constitute such an approach?)
Also he would need a new approach to the mitzvah of emunah see rambam and chinuch who seem to assume that chakirah is בכלל the mitzvah. And mitzvos don't change.
I think its specific for Klal Yisroel
ReplyDeleteSee notes of Rebbe Reb Meilech on the sefer
The question about mitzvot not changing is a valid point( the Zlotchover quotes the Rishonim),
the Mictav MaEliyahu says somewhere (don't have it in front of me now) that the mitzvah is to counteract the problem in the generation, in the times of the Rishonim it was philosophy,now it is something else