The Gemorah in Pesachim (56a) says that after the shevatim
said shema Yisroel to prove their allegiance toward Hashem, Yaakov
responded with baruch shem.
Because of this we recite it after saying shema in our daily
recitation. The question is how we view
this additional line added into shema, does it now become an extension of the possuk shema yisroel and therefore should have all the stringencies that the law prescribes for the first verse, or is it viewed as a separate
line with its own rules? In many instances we find that the
Mishna Berura rules that its part of shema. See 61:11, 63:11, 65:10 in regard to interrupting
to talk to someone, intent and if one must recite it with the
congregation. In all these cases the Mishna Berura equates baruch shem with the possuk of shema yisroel. From all those instances
it seems that he rules that baruch shem is part of the verse of shema
yisroel. However, in 61:13 in buir
halacha he rules that if one forgets to say baruch shem one must not
repeat shema.
Here it seems that baruch shem isn’t considered part of the verse
of shema yisroel, opposite from the aforementioned sources? Rav Asher Weiss explains that there are two
parts to shema. There is the
mitzvah of reciting shema and then there is the kabalos ol that must
be accepted in shema. Baruch
shem isn’t part of the mitzvah of saying shema, its not at all in
the Torah. However, it is part of
the kabalos ol. Therefore, regarding
the stringencies that affect intent, the baruch shem is just as important
as shema. However, if one forgot
it since its not part of the basic recitation of shema one doesn’t need
to go back to repeat it.
The following paragraphs (in different type set) are stolen from
the blog Mevakesh Lev in the piece entitled "Baruch
Sheim."
The Brisker Rav was exceedingly exacting in the way he said Krias
Shema. It would take him a very long time. (Parenthetically, the Gemara
says that the reward for reciting Shema carefully is that Gehinom will
be cooled off for him. This is a tremendous schar. Nevertheless,
apparently not all Gedolei Yisrael held of the extreme extent to which the
Briskers take this inyan. One time, Rav Meir Soloveitchik was in
the presence of the Chazon Ish when he (Rav Meir) was saying Shema.
He said it in Brisker form, taking an extremely long time to say every word
with the utmost of precision. Afterwards, the Chazon Ish told him, “Be careful
you don’t catch a cold.”)
Baruch sheim, though, was not given the same
attention to exactitude. Given his pace throughout the rest of Shema, the
amount of time from when he finished the word echad until he
began v’ahavtah was much quicker. When asked about this, the
Rav answered as follows.
The halacha that one must be medakdeik in
Krias Shema is not because of the act of kabalas ol malchus Shamayim,
but a requirement as far as reading pesukim is concerned. The
proof of this is the source of precision reading. It is derived from the word v’limadetem,
which Chazal darshen to mean that your limud should
be tahm, complete. The enunciation should be unadulterated. Where
does the word v’limadetem appear in Krias Shema? In the second
paragraph. Most Rishonim hold that the second paragraph is
only required mi’d’Rabannan, so the derasha cannot
be referring only to Krias Shema. Rather, it is a halacha that
applies to mikrah, reading pesukim.
Rav Moshe Feinstein was once observed doing shnayim mikrah,
and it was apparent that he was saying the words with the same degree of
precision as when he would say Krias Shema. So we see that he too
held that the halacha of precision reading is not a
requirement unique to Shema, but that it is a requirement insofar
as reading pesukim is concerned.
Baruch Sheim, despite being
an integral part of kabalas ol malchus Shamayim, is not a pasuk,
and therefore does not require the same level of precision.
There is another time we find the saying of baruch shem. In the mikdash they wouldn’t respond
to a blessing by answering amen, they would respond with baruch shem
(see Taanis 16b.) Are these two
mentioning's of baruch shem, the response in the mikdash and our
recitation in shema two independent dinim, or do they share one yesod
hadin? Rav Solevetchik explains that
the מחייב of baruch shem is the mentioning of the חלות שם הוי"ה. In the mikdash it was always
considered a חלות
שם הוי"ה since that was the way it should been pronounced. Even after
the death of Shimon Hatzaddik when they stopped pronouncing it that way (see Yoma 39b) it still was considered a חלות שם הוי"ה. Similarly, the verse of shema yisroel is
considered to be mentioning the שם הוי"ה (see Gra siman 5 Orach Chayim.) That’s what is the trigger for saying baruch
shem. (The Gemarah in Pesachim is
thus read to be analyzing if inserting this praise into the krias shema itself
would constitute an interruption of the recitation. The conclusion is since Yaakov said it,
therefore we may incorporate it into shema and not only is it praise
permitted to add into the shema, but it becomes part of the kabbalos ol.)
The Rambam at the beginning of the book of Ahava cites
the verse of מה
אהבתי תורתך כל היום היא שיחתי. Rav
Solevetchik said that in the opinion of the Rambam, shema has two parts
too it, it is a mitzvah to read the words twice a day, in the morning and
evening but there is an additional aspect of the kabalos ol, that fulfillment
extends throughout the entire day, it is כל היום bookended
at the beginning and the end of the day with krias shema.
The nature of this additional aspect of kabalos ol needs
to be explained. We already said Hashem
eched, what are we adding? And why
is it said quietly? When the Rizhonir
was a young boy he asked the Alter Rebbe how can we say ואהבת את ה' אלקיך if we already said Hashem
eched and acknowledged our existence as meaningless? (Of course, this is to show the greatness of
the Rizhonor that at a young boy he was asking such questions while older
people like myself are asking if our favorite football team will make the playoffs
and other such intelligent questions.) The
Alter Rebbe gave him a six hour explanation about יחודא עילאה and יחודא תתאה and answered his
question. Obviously, this explanation is
beyond the scope of this elucidation, but we can at least glean shema yisroel
is the level of ultimate yechud with Hashem. However, this doesn’t give any “room” for a
person to live. We must take it down a
notch in order to maintain a living relationship with Hashem and we acknowledge
this lacking in our ability to recognize yichud Hashem in its optimal
form quietly.
I don't understant how R' Asher Weiss answers the problem. If the fact that one must repeat shema or boruch shem because of a lack of כונה is a function of קבלת על then they are to be equated. If so if forgotten entirely ק"ו that one should have to go back אין לך חיסרון בקבלת על גדול מזו. Unless you want to answer that saying something without כונה is more of a חסרון בקבלת על than leaving something out entirely (למשל בעלמא דומה למזוייף מתוכו).
ReplyDeleteאגב We see that the din of קבלת על is מעכב the din of קריאה. This is clear from משנה ברורה סימן סג ס"ק י"ד שאם נזכר שלא קרא פסוק ראשון בכונה חוזר וקורא כל הפרשה הראשונה פעם שניה כיון שכל הקריאה שקרא אחר הפסוק הראשון שהיה בלי כונה הוי כמו הקורא למפרע שלא יצא.
How come no explanation of the distinction between על מלכות שמים ועל מצות?
ReplyDelete