[See the Nitziv in Megillah 13a
that understands the Gemorah not that it was an immersion for gerus, rather
it was the immersion a baal teshuva goes through when they
repent.]
The question is how do Chazal
derive that the daughter of Pharaoh had this intent, maybe she just went to
cool off from the hot Egyptian sun? Rov Dovid Solovetchik explains based
upon a story with his father. When the family was running during the war,
they were on a ship and of course didn't eat anything. One of the people
serving the food badgered them about their lack of eating and agreed to use new
utensils and cook them rice. The Briskor Rav relented and sent one of his
sons to start the fire to avoid bishul akum. The man
preparing the food said its unnecessary, I'm a Jew! The Briskor Rav said he had
an inkling this was the case, for it didn't make sense to him why this person
cared so much about them. If he was Jewish, it’s understandable that it
was built into his DNA to be a nice person. Says Rav Dovid, Chazal understood
if the daughter of Pharaoh was having such compassion on a stranger's child, it
must be she was rejecting avodah zarah. Now I understood some
readers will like this idea, but it seems quite crazy to me. Do you mean
to say that your average goy will just abandon a baby that
needs help? The only people in the world that have any iota of compassion
are Jews?
The question though still remains, where do Chazal see to say such
a derasha? The Torah Temimah explains since
the Nile was worshiped by the Egyptians it wouldn't be a place where one would
go to just cool off, that would be denigrating to the avodah zarah.
If she was bathing in the Nile it demonstrated a rejection of the avodah
zarah. This point has a halachik ramification as well. The possuk
says that Yocheved placed Moshe at the edge of the river (2:3) but in possuk 5
the daughter of Pharaoh finds Moshe in the water. Was he
next to the water or in the water? The Rogatchover explains that Yocheved
didn't want to use the Nile River for it was used as adodah zarah so she
placed Moshe next to the river. However, after bas Pharaoh
was mebatel the avodah zarah by using it in a
demeaning manner, it became permissible to benefit from the Nile and Moshe
through Divine intervention was pushed into the river.
The bittul of the Nile isn’t just a halachik bittul,
it is also a theological bittul.
The avodah zarah of the Nile was the pursuit of gashmious. When Pharaoh decrees that all the sons should
be thrown in the Nile, he is ordering to drown Klal Yisroel in the pursuit
of gashmious. It is the Nile
leading to the saving of Klal Yisroel that is the ultimate defeat of
this plan. It is Moshe Rabbenu (and
there is a little Moshe inside everyone see Tanya chapter 42,) who gives us the
capability to float and not get drowned in the mayim rabim (וד"ל) of gashmious pursuits
(based on Likutay Sichos volume 16.)
Reb Dovid is correct. Any compassion displayed by contemporary עכו"ם is only to the extent that they were influenced by the torah. See ramban in drashas toras hashem temima. With this yesod we can answer some very unusual divrei chazal about if one meets an עכו"ם on the road that one should position oneself appropriately so that when the עכו"ם draws his weapon to kill the ישראל he should be prepared.
ReplyDeleteI don't understand the rogotchaver. isn't the nile mechubar l'karka and doesn't become assur? על ההרים אלוהיהם ולא ההרים אלוהיהם.
ReplyDeleteSee Rogatchover inside that says it was assur because of tpesas yeda adam since they dud in the river to make irrigation ditches
ReplyDeleteIn regard to point one, I knew you would agree and you are the readers (yes plural) that will agree with him.
ReplyDeleteI still think its crazy
We can disagree
Sorry, misspelled previous point, I meant they dug in the river