Here we
mentioned the chiddush of the Briskor Rav that the avodah of the ketores
is different from that of the korbanot tzibbur. When it comes to korbanot, the mitzvah
is to achieve kapparah. However,
regarding the ketores the mitzvah is merely to do the act of offering
the ketores. He supports this from the terminology
of the Rambam is the Sefer Hamitzvot who says the mitzvah of the korbanot is
one the tzibbur and fulfilled by the kohanim. Regarding the ketores, he says the
mitzvah is one the kohanim to offer the ketores. The need for communal atonement is not an
integral part of the mitzvah. The Achronim
point out that regarding the mitzvah of lighting the menorah the Rambam also
says the mitzvah is on the kohanim to light it (asseh #25.)
The Daas Zekanim in Terumah (25:6) says that the
Torah mentions the שמן
למאור within the parsha of the building of the mishkan because
it’s also part of the building of the mishkan because a house without light
isn’t a house. Based upon this it could
shed light on the aforementioned Rambam.
The need for a menorah isn’t for atonement, its to complete the building
of the mishkan.
Now we understand why Aharon is comforted with the lighting
of the menorah and not with another one of the mikdash activities (see
Rashi, Ramban.) In order to inaugurate the
mishkan, it had to be an avodah that would consecrate the mikdash
and that is accomplished through lighting the menorah.
No comments:
Post a Comment