Thursday, November 17, 2022

The Pillar of Stability

Harav Hagaon Yosef Elefant Shlita

The passuk says: וְאַבְרָהָם זָקֵן בָּא בַּיָּמִים. The simple meaning of this phrase is that Avraham Avinu was growing old, getting on in years. But the Zohar Hakadosh interprets this phrase to mean that Avraham Avinu “came with all his days” — when he reached the end of his life, he brought all his days with him, not losing any of them. This means that he utilized his opportunities, but it means, primarily, that he created a consistency: All his days were a continuum.

In other words, the ability to come with all one’s days is not merely a sign that the person maximized his potential; it also means that he kept on growing constantly.  What is the secret that enables a person to “come with all his days”?

In last week’s parashah, after Sedom is overturned, the Torah says: וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם אֶת פְּנֵי ה'. Chazal derive a few insights from this passuk. From the words אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם, the Gemara (Berachos 6b) derives that Avraham Avinu established a makom kavua for his prayer, and teaches that whoever establishes a makom kavua for davening receives Hashem’s assistance: כל הקובע מקום לתפלתו אלקי אברהם בעזרו.

Now, the simple meaning is that Avraham Avinu had a geographical makom kavua where he davened. But there’s a deeper message here as well, and that is reflected in another teaching of Chazal in connection with this passuk. Chazal link this passuk with the passuk in Tehillim that states: מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה' וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ. The words מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה' allude to Avraham at the Akeidah, say Chazal, while the words וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ allude to Avraham’s holding onto his position and staying there, as the passuk says: וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם.

A person can reach incredible heights, as Avraham did at the Akeidah — that’s מִי יַעֲלֶה בְהַר ה'. In contrast, ּוּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ refers to a person who’s stable and steady, holding onto his position and staying there. At times, it can be relatively easy to climb the mountain, but it’s a lot harder to stay in that place and hold onto that level. In expounding the words וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם, Chazal praise Avraham for returning to the place where he was the day before. On that day, Avraham davened, but Hashem didn’t accept his tefillos. Yet he got up the next morning and continued from the same place where he had been the previous day.

This would seem to be a pretty simple act on Avraham’s part: He davened in the same place where he davened the day before. Yet this is the act that Chazal point to as the paradigm of holding on steadily to one’s spiritual level: וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ.

Sometimes we think that in order to hold onto one’s level, a person has to make major, dramatic changes. Yet Chazal are telling us that just davening in the same place that you davened the day before creates stability. Long-term growth and consistency in avodas Hashem is not built on dramatic changes; it’s based on a person’s daily routine, doing the same thing day after day, davening in the same place and the same situation.

Avraham returned to the same place even though he had failed the day before. That’s the secret of consistency — not starting each time anew, but taking a position and going with it. Sometimes it works, and sometimes it doesn’t. Sometimes the tefillah is heard, and sometimes it’s not. The secret of אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם sheds light on Chazal’s other statement that whoever establishes a makom kavua for davening receives Hashem’s assistance. Chazal don’t just mean an actual geographic location where a person sits each time he davens; they are referring to a person who has successfully created a consistency, and isn’t jumpy, doing things one day like this and one day like that.

A third teaching that Chazal derive from these words is that Avraham instituted the tefillah of Shacharis. Amidah is a lashon of prayer, so the words אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם indicate that Avraham davened. Yitzchak, we know, instituted Minchah, as the passuk in this week’s parashah says, וַיֵּצֵא יִצְחָק לָשׂוּחַ בַּשָּׂדֶה, while Yaakov instituted Maariv: וַיִּפְגַּע בַּמָּקוֹם.

The Sfas Emes notes that these tefillos parallel the attributes of each of the Avos. Avraham’s middah was ahavah; Hashem referred to him אַבְרָהָם אֹהֲבִי, as we read in last week’s haftarah. Yitzchak’s middah was yirah — Pachad Yitzchak, and Yaakov’s middah was emes. The Sfas Emes explains that the reason Yaakov instituted Maariv, specifically, is that emes — which is ויצית ונכון וקיים — implies the creation of something lasting. Yaakov Avinu’s tefillah is at the end of the day, when a person wraps up his avodah, so that he can perpetuate and hold onto whatever he achieved during the day.

Yitzchak’s tefillah, Minchah, is said during the day. The words וַיֵּצֵא יִצְחָק לָשׂוּחַ בַּשָּׂדֶה implies that he’s out in the field, doing his everyday tasks. For that you need yirah; ahavah doesn’t work when you’re out on the street.

But Avraham Avinu is ahavah. The Sfas Emes explains that וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר means that before he did anything else, he davened to Hakadosh Baruch Hu. That’s ahavah: putting the loved one before all other activities. When Avraham Avinu got up early in the morning and davened, he showed his ahavah for Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

The power of Shacharis, in all generations, is putting Hakadosh Baruch Hu before all other interests. That’s run by the engine of ahavah.

Regarding the words (Yeshayah 41:8): אַבְרָהָם אֹהֲבִי, Rashi comments that Avraham Avinu is called ohavi because he had no one to teach him; he came to know Hashem through his love for Him. No one gave him tochachah; he had no rebbi or father to teach him. What powered him was the engine of ahavah, and that ahavas Hashem brought him to recognize Hashem.

We generally think it was the other way around — Avraham recognized Hashem, and that brought him to ahavah. But Rashi is telling us the opposite: Avraham’s love for Hakadosh Baruch Hu, after seeing Him in the briah, propelled him to an immense love for Him, and that led him to all his intellectual attainments. This idea is reflected in the words וַיַּשְׁכֵּם אַבְרָהָם בַּבֹּקֶר.

So, we have three derashos on this passuk: establishing a makom kavua for davening, Avraham returning to his place of the previous day — וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ, and his instituting Shacharis with an act of ahavah, וַיַּשְׁכֵּם, prioritizing Hakadosh Baruch Hu before anything else. And that ahavah explains the consistency of Avraham Avinu.

The more we develop our ahavas Hashem, and the more we look at the briah and see the chessed that Hakadosh Baruch Hu has done for us, the more we can create the וַיַּשְׁכֵּם, the to place the Eibishter before anything else. And that’s the engine that creates the וּמִי יָקוּם בִּמְקוֹם קָדְשׁוֹ and the קובע מקום לתפלתו . The consistency of the relationship is a derivative of the ahavah that a person awakens in himself for Hakadosh Baruch Hu.

This is what it means that Avraham Avinu was בָּא בַּיָּמִים, he came with all his days. He was a pillar of consistency, stability, and continuity: אֶל הַמָּקוֹם אֲשֶׁר עָמַד שָׁם. And he was a pillar of Ahavah.

Wednesday, November 16, 2022

Think About It

 Shulchan Aruch Alter Rebbe Ch. 2 law 12:  

 וכל אדם צריך ליזהר להוציא בשפתיו ולהשמיע לאזניו כל מה שלומד בין במקרא משנה ותלמוד אלא אם כן בשעת עיון להבין דבר מתוך דבר וכל מה שלומד בהרהור לבד ואפשר לו להוציא בשפתיו ואינו מוציא אינו יוצא בלימוד זה ידי חובת מצות ולמדתם אותם וכמ"ש לא ימוש ספר התורה הזה מפיך והגית בו וגו' וכמו בכל המצות התלויות בדבור שאינו יוצא בהן ידי חובתו בהרהור אלא אם כן שומע מפי המדבר שהשומע כעונה בפיו. אך אם מוציא בשפתיו אף על פי שאינו מבין אפילו פירוש המלות מפני שהוא עם הארץ הרי זה מקיים מצות ולמדתם ולפיכך כל עם הארץ מברך ברכת התורה בשחר לפני הפסוקים וכן כשעולה לספר תורה.

The simple read is that one fulfills Talmud Torah only when speaking the words.  The Rebbe says that what it is saying is one doesn't fulfill ולמדתם אותם but there is a kium of והגית.  

The Rebbe (Chiddushhim Ubiurin Beshas VeRambam siman 18) footnote 21:


I don't understand where do we see that והגית is a separate mitzvah of learning Torah?  This is reminiscent of a past post here. 

Looking Toward The Future

From Rav Kook

 לז. קדושת הזווג והמשפחה

מצד קדושת המעשה וקדושת המחשבה, הפועלת לקבע קדושת הטבע והרצון ביסוד יסודו, עד לקדושת הזיווג בעצמות הטבע הטהור והקדוש, כדוגמת האדם לפני החטא, ולמעלה למעלה גם על ידי השאיפה לקדושת עולמים זו, מתעדן כל הקישור הנפשי, ויחס המשפחה מתקשר בחוטי קודש קדשים, שהם חזקים ואמיצים מאד, וגורם שפע חיים ארוכים לתולדותיו. ומיסוד צדיק כזה מושפע שפע החיים והעדינות, העז והאומץ, וגם ישות החיים בגדולה, וגוברת עז על כל החיים, על כל הנלווים אליו, על כל הדור, על כל העולם. אומץ מוסיף אומץ, חיים ממשיכים חיים, כבוד ותפארת מזהיר תפארת והדרת קודש על כל.

לח. הנטיה המינית לעתיד

הנטיה המינית הולכת היא וזורמת אל העתיד, אל שכלול החיים, שיביא הזמן, את חיי העולם הבא בעולם הזה, ומתוך שהחיים העתידים הנם מלאים הוד ונועם מלא, על כן גדולה היא שאיפת החפץ ועז הרצון של נטית עולמים זאת, והקדושה המגמתית רק עליה היא משרה את אורה, והנפש הטהורה מנהגת את נטיה זו למגמתה, בגידור התורה, החכמה, היושר והצניעות, מקורי הצדק. כל מאן דנטיר ברית איקרי צדיק. ויסוד קדושתן של ישראל הוא קשור בעולם העתיד, ורוח קדושה הולך וחופף על כלל האומה ופרטיה. ועמך כלם צדיקים.

Not sure what this means but he attempts to explain why some of the craziness in the world is what it is now.

Friday, November 11, 2022

Innermost Desire

וישא אברהם את עיניו וירא והנה איל אחר נאחז בסבך בקרניו וילך אברהם ויקח את האיל ויעלהו לעלה תחת בנו

Why did the איל Avraham offered as a korban have to be designated on Friday בין השמשות?  Chazal (Pirkey D' Rebbe Eliezer Ch. 30) identifies the horns of the ram as the horn blown at Mattan Torah and the horn of Mashiach.  Why is this ram so important that it is designated to be used for the most important points in history?  

The words אחר seems meaningless, what it does it mean another ram?  Chazal translate the word אחר as in אחרי, afterward; either later in history on Rosh Hashana we should blow the shofar to arose mercy or in the days of the future the horn will be blown to redeem us even though we are stuck in averot.  What does that have to do with the story of Avraham?   .

The nisayon of the Akedah was to prove it Avraham's ultimate passion was for the commandment of Hashem.  The passing of the nisayon established that the pnemious of Avraham was to be attached to Hashem.  His essence, his DNA was connection to Hashem.  He passed that down into the generations that followed.  Therefore, even when our merits can be called not question, when the pitfalls of life may have led us astray, the horn of the ram awakens the pnimious to come out and be worthy of redemption of vindication in judgement.  

This deep inner connection to Hashem was transferred into the ram and that is why it is used for events which are an outgrowth of the connection that Klal Ysirael has.  That is why the ram was created Friday bein hashmashot.  It is the bridge between teva and beyond teva.  The teva is the סיבוך surrounding the ram, the hardships of life.  The מעל לטבע is the pnemious connection that can't be severed. 

Rashi (22:2) cites Chazal say Hashem said to Avraham please pass this test so that people don't say the first one's were nothing.  Why if he failed the akedah are the previous tests meaningless?  Because this test was to see if the pnemious of Avraham, if his ultimate desire, when everything else was on the line was with Hashem or not. 

Bowing For Redemption

 The Midrash (56:2) אָמַר רַבִּי יִצְחָק הַכֹּל בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, וְאַבְרָהָם לֹא חָזַר מֵהַר הַמּוֹרִיָּה בְּשָׁלוֹם אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, וְנִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה וְנָשׁוּבָה אֲלֵיכֶם. יִשְׂרָאֵל לֹא נִגְאֲלוּ אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות ד, לא): וַיַּאֲמֵן הָעָם וגו' וַיִקְדּוּ וַיִּשְׁתַּחֲווּ. הַתּוֹרָה לֹא נִתְּנָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות כד, א): וְהִשְׁתַּחֲוִיתֶם מֵרָחֹק. חַנָּה לֹא נִפְקְדָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמואל א א, כח): וַיִּשְׁתַּחוּ שָׁם לַה': הַגָּלֻיּוֹת אֵינָן מִתְכַּנְסוֹת אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (ישעיה כז, יג): וְהָיָה בַּיּוֹם הַהוּא יִתָּקַע בְּשׁוֹפָר גָּדוֹל וגו' וְהִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לַה' בְּהַר הַקֹּדֶשׁ בִּירוּשָׁלַיִם. בֵּית הַמִּקְדָּשׁ לֹא נִבְנָה אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (תהלים צט, ט): רוֹמְמוּ ה' אֱלֹהֵינוּ וְהִשְׁתַּחֲווּ לְהַר קָדְשׁוֹ. הַמֵּתִים אֵינָן חַיִּין אֶלָּא בִּזְכוּת הִשְׁתַּחֲוָיָה, שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (תהלים צה, ו): בֹּאוּ נִשְׁתַּחֲוֶה וְנִכְרָעָה נִבְרְכָה לִפְנֵי ה' עֹשֵׂנוּ.

What is the significance of bowing?  It is not the mere physical act of bowing but an inner bowing.  Bowing is an expression of complete subordination before someone else.  By acknowledging that one is totally dependent on Hashem one merits redemption.  See here and Nesivot Shalom. 

Sunday, November 6, 2022

Milah Points

The Bartenura on the Torah (17:24) says וקשה לפי זה למה המתין כל כך למול את עצמו. י"ל משום דהא דאמרינן שקיים כל המצות היינו לאחר שנמול אבל קודם לכן לא היה לו דעת לקיים מצות ולא נפתחו עיני שכלו וכדפרש"י לעיל שלא היה בו כח לסבול גלוי השכינה ולעמוד.  According to the Bartenura, Avraham fulfilled all the mitzvot only after his Milah.  The Maharsha in Yevamot (100b) suggests the same idea to explain how Avraham could marry Hagar, who was a first generation Egyptian, whom one is prohibited from marrying?  He says, it must be Avraham only kept the Torah after his Milah.  (According to the Maharsha it still is difficult how did Avraha marry  קטורה who Chazal identify as Hagar, at that point it was after Avraham's bris?)  See here where he cites Rishonim deal with the question about Hagar.   

According to the Bartenura, the bris milah of Avraham was not a mere mitzvah like any other but it was a transformation of his entire being.  This is supported from the Midrash beginning of Vaerah which comments on the greater level of Avraham after the milah.  

The Gemarah Avodah Zarah (27a) has a machlokes tanaim if Milah has to be done lishma.  The opinion of R' Yose is that it does not.  The Yaavetz asks a contradiction because in Yevamot (46b) R' Yose says if one comes before Beit Din with a milah having been done we can't just do the tevilah part because it is possible the milah was not done lishma.  But R' Yose doesn't hold a milah has to be done lishma?  The Chasam Sofer (Yoreh Deah teshuva #1,300) answers by differentiating between the milah of a yisrael and that of one who wants to be converted.  The regular mitzvah of milah for a Yisrael does not have to be one lishma but to enter into the Jewish nation one requires their milah being done lishma.  The Meshech Chachma (end of Lech Lecha and Bo) also suggests this idea as does Rav Yosef Engel. 

The possuk (17:23) says that Avraham gave all the people in his household a milah and then the last possuk in the parsha (17:27) repeats that Avraham gave them a milah.  Why does it repeat this?  The Ramban says that Avraham first gave everyone else a milah and then he gave himself a milah.  How could he give them a milah if he himself didn't have a milah (according to the opinion in Avodah Zarah that only one who has a milah can give a milah?)  The Chasam Sofer says that since Avraham was intending to get a milah he is considered to have a milah.  But that is only if he ended up getting a milah.  That's what the last possuk means, only after Avraham gave himself a milah was their milah complete (that is how it is נמלו אתו, with his bris their bris was complete as well.) 

The Tosfat Yeshanim in Yevamot asks the question of the Yaavetz and answers that R' Yose said in Avodah Zarah a milah doesn't have to be done lsihma only when a Jew is standing over the gentile telling him to do the milah lishma.  In other words, R' Yose also holds a milah has to be done lishma but it suffices it a gentile does it when a Jew tells him what to do.  This is very difficult to read into the Gemarah Avodah Zarah.  See also Achiezer volume 3 siman 27. 

The Avnei Nazer Yoreh Deah (345 end of the teshuva) takes issue with the Chasam Sofer for (if I understand his question correctly,) for if a milah not done lishma is considered a milah then the ger should be no different from someone who doesn't have an ערלה that wants to become a ger where he just does tevilah?  His question is propitiated on the assumption that there is no הטפת דם ברית in those situations which is a machlokes Rishonim.  But even if those cases don't require הטפת דם ברית here it is worse for in those scenarios the ger doesn't have an ערלה, so he just does tevilah but here the ger was an ערל and a milah no done lishma doesn't remove the ערלה status vis-a-vis gerus.  

R' Yose learns his law of milah lishma from the parsha here (17:13) הִמּ֧וֹל ׀ יִמּ֛וֹל יְלִ֥יד בֵּֽיתְךָ֖ וּמִקְנַ֣ת כַּסְפֶּ֑ךָ וְהָיְתָ֧ה בְרִיתִ֛י בִּבְשַׂרְכֶ֖ם לִבְרִ֥ית עוֹלָֽם, he learns the double verb teaches that circumcision may be performed by anyone.  However, if we put the idea of the Bartenura and the Chasam Sofer together it is difficult for this is the milah of gerus and there everyone requires it to be lishma?

Gilgul Of Women

 From דברי יעקב on ברכות 






From נפשי בשאלתי by Rav Yaakov Lugassy 










Anybody know anything about gilgul of women?