In Parshas Lech Lechah (15:2) Avrohom says “what can you
give me I don’t have any children and Eliezer my servant will inherit me.” Chazal have a derash on the words of
the verse that describe Eliezer as ben damasak that Eliezer was dolah
umashkeh metoroshon shel Avrohom which means that Eliezer taught the Torah
of Avrohom to the masses. This is
seemingly a great praise of Eliezer, so why would Avrohom mention this when he
was trying to “complain” that Eliezer would inherit him? In our Parsha we find that there is a switch
in terms for how Eliezer is referred to.
He is originally referred to as eved, slave then he is called iesh,
man and finally reverts back to eved. Why the change in language? In Parshas Chukas there is a midrash cited in
the Daas Zekanim that Og is Eliezer, how can it be that Eliezer the
servant of Avrohom who taught Torah, would go fight against Klal Yisroel?
The Meor VAshemesh in Lech Lechah explains Avrohom’s point
was that Eliezer can only give over my Torah but has no ability to be mechadash
on his own. Eliezer was completely nullified
before Avrohom and that’s where his whole Judaism stemmed from, but he hadn’t
figured out his own path how to serve Hashem.
That is a denigration of Eliezer for a person isn’t supposed to do
Judaism because that’s what his father or master did, but he is supposed to
figure out the proper path in life by himself.
We can now explain our Parsha. First Eliezer is going on his mission as a
pure slave doing the bidding of his master.
When he arrives, he must decide who is the right match and must do an
action of his own to figure out how to find the right match. Therefore, he is called an iesh for he
did an action on his own accord not simply being a servant following orders. This was his chance to advance and become an iesh
(to find his own path in serving Hashem not just copying Avrohom.) However, he came to Laven and said eved
Avrohom anochi- I’m merely a slave following Avrohom not my own being, that
I acted on my own accord was a temporary change based upon necessity, so he
goes back to being called an eved.
Now we understand how Eliezer became Og. His whole service of Hashem came from his
service to Avrohom. Once Avrohom passed
on, Eliezer lost his whole source of his service of Hashem and therefore went
on to become Og.
In next week’s Parsha, Rashi tells us that the prayers of
Yitzchak were answered over those of Rivka because Yitzchak was a tzaddik the
son of a tzaddik as opposed to Rivka who was the daughter of a rasha. Why is the son of a tzaddik a reason to have
his prayers accepted more it would seem that the son of a rasha had more work
to do to become a tzaddik and that should be a reason that his prayers are
accepted more? The Michtav MeEliyahu
explains that the son of a tzaddik has a harder job to find his own path of
avodas Hashem. Yet Yitzchak was
successful as Avrohom emphasized the attribute of chesed as oppose to Yitzhak
who was known for the attribute of gevurah.
The Panim Meiros says the reason why each one of the avos is mentioned independently
in the shemonah esraih is since each one found their own path in avodas Hashem
and didn’t just take what their father gave them.
I understand that michtav meeliyahu about yitzchak because he is a son. I don't understand how this applies to eliezer. Is an eved supposed to act not like an eved? shouldn't this acceptance of avraham's approach be the ideal way of service for an eved like eliezer. this is even implied in the medrash you quoted above that eliezer was rewarded for being a faithful servant.
ReplyDeleteTrue there is an advantage of being a faithful eved but it is a fault as well, a double edged sword.
ReplyDelete